=e By JA Now y JAMES LEECH that the federal 2 The : ral govern hen introduced its “anti- Den tp we. Dill, what will hap- ing the enormous profits ee by corporations? Sumerg h happen to prices con- Meedg> yve to pay for their Wages What will happen: to pulich have‘ consistently oehind prices and profits? CUseq if therotes may be ex- Cone.” found on question- Herp cot Affairs Minister Of the Tay, that the contents Pre ill were still “fuzzy.” said an Inister Trudeau had Mot iq :Pril 24 that this bill “is bil, Wy itself an anti-inflation Other ah dealt with that in Nofiteer :.. This is an anti- Pressed "2 anti-gouging bill.” Profiteer; Or an explanation of out 8; the PM weaseled Th : : Wage oN Is that pressure from un aes. Tight across the have Be nose living standards © pri N Constantly eroded by to implement this it will be enforc- lic pressure. ‘he ay, interest rates were 0 that 5 to a 10.5% minimum ha pane buying is out of Wort, sn for millions of ate dy © Cattadians — and rents Fin Nisin there's c® Minister Turner says Com * sy €ven bigger squeeze al rae 's department’s annu- Cast i » Unveiled April 29, fore- for Ntinuing Soaring prices Dei “mers, and “some tem- Bowe) “averse effects on the *endittre © real income and of Canadian house- UTU local hits at | "profits up by 79% Cw te Torgy gate ooo more man 7 1 stan. eat, ympe* a, snelt ny arto, re Compe “ \ report t —| ws a as Datelin S Urrespung be Th; © Business dou e «« Plumptre sets meetings “i: o GM Cxecuty sees On higher food: costs «siz Paid Sala want oe zach ~ eee ae areca . oil uae wy We i —— line x VINgS Plan ang ami 'ag@3 of g Way Plan for Se the tax Profit ®™Ploye9s LECTED Advan. Paxprofitting | holds.” The review admitted _ that: “Labor income was a dis- tinctly smaller share of the total in 1973.” Agriculture Minister Whelan, pointing out that Canadians “don’t know how lucky they are,’ warned us to be prepared for higher prices for food. Working people might ask: What good is the “anti-profiteer- ing” bill if inflation is going to -be allowed to continue to run wild? Just in recent days we were threatened with a 20-30% in- crease in the price of. canned food. While the Food Prices Re- view Board hid from the press hints of arbitration a ae Ss of ie Tang Orta; Sue -of the United fda ., On Union News car- MeGrepet@tement by W. C. Y. Chadian Chairman of the : in alway Labor Asso- “Cog Which he noted that wttary ot had to be taken at yokers, Thitration for railway meu. eae € executive of the wiel® Mog al 343 in Hamilton doit the Tegor to let him know thee The pought of the pro- ‘ir letter: Ollowing is part of ag 8 a amas! Union is shocked laineg 3° @t the suggestion Sy Al that the v the Feb.-March is- taj, Ven - News (Canada) torent jg Pe _ Slightest enter- tions of arbit: €ing given to any Athi haben. rkes en 1S arbitration and wets tn mf the membership’s Bointt® ab “ide our conditions. hg do Solutely Opposed to With, that road. - tye? chan t Interference ME proce, We Heed in nego- sitite the eaure is clear. We tone? wit 4ninhibited right to " Interference by teh Y or for any other outside Me, Unt} . ce: We need that we can? Satisfactory agree- the’ e arrived at. If the Molar Panies understand Dat Singers en We will have , On _~ argaining on their {np . COondig; de® Way euitions still have a 10) Nga’ the «;, 8° to catch up; in- “for narcation demands the Yargaining to re- Tation of our condi- cover lost ground as recom- mended by the CLC in its recent brief to the federal cabinet .. - this local suggests that opening ° the present agreement around the question of the soaring cost of living would be more in order, in our opinion, instead of those headlines of voluntary arbitra- tion in the U.T.U. News. Unity on Issues Under present conditions the worker is being forced to fight back, not only to increase his ~ standard of living or maintain what he has, but to regain what he has _ lost. Objectively, this means that the situation is bet- ‘ ter for uniting workers around -bread and butter issues. This is clearly shown by the statements of leading Hamilton trade unionists at a recent press con- ference on prices, where all of them spoke of the need for shorter term contracts and effec- tive cost of living clauses as well as increased wages to 1m- prove the standard of living for all workers. : Price gouging and profiteer- ing also means that all our bene- -fits are undermined and pension- ers suffer as well because of their fixed incomes. ‘We suggest to you that what is required now is more muscle not less, and we recommend im- mediate meetings of all locals to place before the employers _ a demand for immediate relief from the cost of living, which - is eroding our living standards, wages and benefits. to discuss: whether a 20 cent beef price rise ovef four days, was due to a shortage, Mr. Whe- ‘lan was declaring: “We have all kinds of meat in Canada right. now.” Cooling. Discontent _ If there appears no rhyme or reason to the government minis- ters’ pronouncements and the pill they claim is to chastise the very corporations who keep them where they are — there is certainly consistency in the ever-growing corporation profits. Despite harsh penalties pro- vided in the bill, one might wait a long time to see a prosecution. The “anti-gouging” bill ap- pears to be the Liberals’ method of cooling the discontent over the endless assault on living © standards. The Tory method is less subtle; Bob. Stanfield would simply freeze wages where they are — well below prices — and allow the profits to. keep rolling ins 32 Everyone knows there are profits; but how many realize the millions that are taken out of working people’s— income every week to create this hoard? The montage on this page gives a sampling of why prices are flying high. -OFL brie TORONTO—tThe Ontario Fed- eration of Labor will present its annual brief to the government of Ontario as the Canadian Trib- ne goes to press. : ie anne synopsis of the. prief- indicates" that the Federa- tion will concern itself heavily with inflation and measures that should be taken to stop it. In its “State of the Economy” the brief notes “Obviously our first concern is the rate of inflation and what is happening to our real wages, and the continued high rate of unemplovment. It is interesting to note that some industrialists have recognized the truth of our repeated asser- tion that wages rather than caus- ing inflation are indeed chasinZ prices. As a result they have given wage increases outside the terms of the agreement to en- deavor to alleviate some of the hardships caused by rising prices.” As a means of combatting - inflation the OFL recommends eight steps that should be taken by the provincial government, in- cluding: a provincial prices Te While increased costs of food are among the first to hit family income, banks and giant basic industries other than food ini- tiate many of the profits climbs which then fan out and affect the whole economy. - We are told frequently that the corporations must have in- centive. If they could not make millions of dollars a month all that syrup about serving Cana- dians would ‘go down the drain. In 1973 after-tax profits (for manufacturing companies alone). took a one-year jump of 42%. Dividends paid out in the first three months of 1974 rose by 35% over last year’s first quar- ter, and doubling and tripling of profits was not unusual. When Is It a Crime? Is this what the government’s anti-gouging bill is going to stop? When Imperial Oil tucks away profit of $92.7-million from Jan. to March is that goug- ing? When it’s up from $46-mil lion in the same period. last year? What about Alcan’s $38.9- million or Ford’s $47-million, or . Shell Canada’s $34-million — all in three months? Steel is basic to the econo- my, but when does profit turn into the criminal acts described challenges view board, public hearings by such a board, strengthening the Department of Consumers’ Af- fairs, strengthening of the com- petition act, curbs on unneces- sary, wasteful and sometimes “untrue advertising, the proper labelling of- containers, urging the federal government to revise the Consumer Price Index, and adoption of measures to en- courage increased food produc- tion. : Employment Standards Act _ The Federation also launched an attack on the Employment Standards Act and said, “The Employment Standards Act has not given in practice what was expected”. _ ; It proposed that in cases of mass layoff, termination of em- ployment and plant shutdowns the following measures be insti- tuted: The workers shoud have the right to re-open negotiations . to resolve the issues and protect the workers’ rights; if the enter- prise is economically viable and the company persists with its decision to shut down, the gov- ernment should take over to 'Profiteering costs Canadians billions in the government bill? Algoma Steel netted nearly $12-million and Steel Co. of Canada close to $22-million from Jan. 1 to March 31. Dome Mines, Toron- to, Dome Petroleum, Calgary, and Union Carbide each grabbed more than $5-million in the same period, while TransCanada Pipe- lines raked in $9.7-million and Brunswick Mining and Smelting got $7.8-million.: That’s a lot of dollars out ofthe pockets of Canadians in a_ three-month period.. The list could be con tinued endlessly: Block Bros. — $4-million, Cadillac Development — $6-million, Falconbridge Cop- per — $6-million, Royal Trust — $3-million, etcetera. Public Ownership . The question one wants an- swered, and might put to his or her Member of Parliament, is: Is this the gouging that’s going to stop, now that we have an “anti-gouging” bill? Are these millions of dollars paid for out of the sweat of Canadian work- ers going to be used to benéfit those who do the work? Or is it going to continue to be siphon- ed off to be wielded by the rich? The only way,to be sure that the wealth and the work of Can- ada benefits its people, as “the Communist Party of Canada has maintained, is to put major in- dustries, banks, transportation, the food industry, as well as land, under public ownership, democratically controlled. As - long as a handful of powerful directorships manoeuvre our lives, the working people will be squeezed in the vice of inflation on the one side and anti-labor bosses and governments on the other. The Coalition to Roll Back Prices, the trade unions (though still on too small a-.scale) are stepping up anti-inflation activi- ties along with other groups. The Communist Party has re- peatedly urged joint extra-par- liamentary efforts by Commun- ists and NDP to bring greater pressure to bear. Such pressure, flowing: from working-class and democratic organizations will be needed to see that anti-profit- eering legislation is indeed pass- ed and enforced—to put an end to price gouging and protect Canadian living standards. inflation - protect the jobs of the workers. Futher: Any layoffs or termi- nations involving 15 or more workers should constitute a group for the purposes of legis-. —lation;-employees should get six months notice of termination or pay in lieu of; notice of termi- nation legislation should apply in all cases whether there is a strike or lockokut or because of technological change or due to environmental considerations; it should be mandatory for man- agement to meet with govern- Ment and labor representatives to resolve the problems; cost of change must be initially paid for by the industry, this applies to retraining, earlier retirement, and so on; notice of termina- tion or payment in lieu of should be mandatory and sepa- rate from severance pay as such and in bankruptcy cases and plant shutdown, for whatever reason, the recovery of workers’ wages should have top priority. A more comprehensive report of. the Federation’s meeting with the government on May 1, will appear next week. PACIFIC TRIBUNE—FRIDAY, MAY 3,. 1974—PAGE 7