By JOHN BOYD PRAGUE ~PRING has come to Czechoslovakia. > Fresh, clean breezes are sweeping the. country, leaving behind the old, gray days of a long, hard winter nd bringing with them many sights nd sounds of a new life... This is as true in the political sense s in the meteorological. Not since the tormy days of February, 1948, when ve foundations of the new socialist zechoslovakia were laid, have the eople of this country been as politi- ally alive and alert as they are today. As Canadians know, Czechoslova- ia during the past three or four 1onths has been the scene of many iteresting events and. developments. Yhat is beind these new develop- 1ents? What does it all mean? In the light of some of the com- entary that has appeared in the ‘estern press, perhaps it would be 2st first to say what it does not mean: @ It is not a battle for power be- veen two individuals or two cliques the Czechoslovak Communist Party. e It is not a struggle between the ‘echs and the Slovaks. @ It is not “another Budapest, 1956.” e It is not an effort by the Czecho- »vak Communists, or even any sec- mn of them, to “break away from the mmmunist bloc,” to take a so-called idependent road.” It is a conscious, planned effort by 2 Communist Party of Czechoslova- a to introduce a greater degree of mocracy into its own work, into the verning bodies and varied public or- izations. and institutions, and into life of the people as a whole. CH 29, 1968—PACIFIC TRIBUNE—Page 6 Workers’ power — February 1948 in Prague’s Wenceslas Square. » oN It is also, in the opinion of Com- munists here, an objective develop- ment, brought about by objective con- ditions—the economic, scientific and technological advance of society and the impossibility of working in new conditions in the old way—a develop- ment that, in one form or another, will have to take place in every socialist country. The circumstances leading up to the present events have been building up for a long while. They came to a head at the plenary meeting of the central committee of the Czechoslovak party last October. At the outset it should be noted, that at the plenum, members of the central committee were all united in agreeing that the political line adopt- ed at their last (13th) congress—in- cluding the program for economic re- form and the foreign policy—was cor- rect. It was when they began discus- sing a set of theses on how the party should lead the people in carrying out that line—its methods and style of work—that a sharp division of opinion developed. Some members asked why the party had lost the confidence of so many sections of the people—among the youth, the intellectuals, the farmers, even among the workers. The answer, they said, was that while the party’s stated aim was to bring these sections of the people together and get them _ to work unitedly for the good of the country, it had failed to do so because it had not used the proper methods in its work. There was an abuse and dis- tortion of the Leninist norms of party work, of democratic centralism, too much bureaucracy and leadership by detree, a stifling of the initiative of the people. All this, it was pointed out, affected every aspect of life: the car- rying through of the economic re- forms; :the relationship. between the two nations, Czech and Slovaks; the anxious? i TOT TT TO TTT AT Te ui We Iii wu ale La me | problems of the old and younger gene- rations; the relations between: workers and intellectuals. RA It soon’ became obvious that the members of the central committee were divided into two main categories: those (now labelled ‘“conservatives’’) who are, in deed if not in word, es- ' sentially for the status quo, and those who are for radical changes in the party’s work and the country’s life. But because the October plenum had to be cut short (to prepare for the Nov. 7 celebrations of the 50th anniversary of the October Revolution) there was no time to complete the discussion that had been started, or even for most of the members to declare their posi- tions. Another session was therefore called for the latter part of December. Meanwhile, details about some of the questions that were raised and some of the things that were said at the plenum began percolating down to the rank and file of the party: and the general public. The grapevine worked overtime and stretched all across the country and beyond the bor- ders. Party members who knew some of the facts began lining up “pro” and “con”; the others were confused and To add fuel to all this, on the heels of the plenum (on Oct. 31), came the student demonstration. For some time before, university students in the Stra- hov district of Prague had been com- plaining about bad lighting and bad . plumbing in their dormitories and about the poor food in the cafeteria. Repeat- ed protests to those responsible got no results; so in the. early evening of Oct. 31, some 1,500 of them organized a parade (carrying candles and signs “We Want Light!’’) and headed. toward’ the centre of the city. On the way they. were stopped by the police and after considerable arguing agreed to turn back. Later, when they learned that three of their number had been held by the police, several hundred of them began to march again. This time the appeals by the police to disperse were refused and a serious clash developed. The police attacked viciously with - clubs and tear gas’ while the students threw stones and other objects. Three policemen and 13 students were in- _jured, two of the students seriously. News of the attack on the students spread quickly among the people. With the exception of a skimpy item in the evening paper, the press had blacked out the event, so the students distri- buted a leaflet on St. Wenceslas Square, in the heart of the city, to tell their story. AAU By mid-December the situation had become extremely tense. Anxiety mounted. The presidium of the central committee, it was reported was meet- ing almost daily and was split down the middle. The press, radio and TV carried the news that Leonid Brezhnev, general secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, had come to Prague, but didn’t say why. He left that same evening. In this tense situa- tion the central committee met again. ‘Fhis time the discussion was wide open, with practically all members - the student demonstration; the ! | speaking their minds and with ‘™!) holds barred”. All the pent-up criticis™ and dissatisfaction with the way ™ party had been led and the way # functioned, came out. Needless to Sa this included questions like: the W4 the problems of the writers had bee? handled last summer; the break a f large numbers of people who had bel?) wrongfully. jailed or denounced as en® mies of the state during and after infamous trial of Slansky and ott former leaders of the party were 5! ‘] not rehabilitated; the restrictions ° news and information media, etc. f But again the plenum had tO ©" postpened, this time because of t* Christmas holidays. It was reconvel ed in early January and the discussi? continued: --= =. ; A It was at these two (December and January) plenums that the suggest! was made to divide the functions 9 general secretary of the party | president of the republic (for seV years held by one man, Antonin : votny). The proposition was debal®, at length—first “whether”, then “wh? | —and then unanimously endorsed. a result, Novotny was relieved of BI post as secretary and Alexander DU cek, until then first secretary of i party in Slovakia, was chosen in his place. Co The central committee decided a meet again sometime in March asked its presidium by that time 1 e Check up on how all committee and institutions of the party are Wo | ing and carrying out their tasks; pe pose how to improve the ,work % these bodies and all party personnel: examined how the party is giving ea ership to the varied government % gans and how to do away with aa) duplication. t. e Draft an Action Program thé) would be operative until the 14th co™ gress of the- party, two years henct The Action Program was to be an a spiring and practical. docume? through which every citizen in the R& public would be able to see his, % her role in helping to advance country’s: economy and _ raise the people’s standard of living. The people greeted these decisiot enthusiastically, although for a while there was considerable skepticism, i kind of “we’ve heard lofty plans a%¢ promises before” attitude. But it® what has followed since that #8 changed the entire atmosphere wi this country. The operative word in Czechoslov# kia today is: democratization. . _ The process of democratization W Started right after the plenum, within the party itself—down to evé branch and member—then among. general public. And it has been gro’ ing like a snowball ever since, as mor and more people are taken up by "+ and begin to realize that this is really . “it” that there’s no going back, to old days. What is important to underline het is that this process is being advanc® . by the party and through the party with the overwhelming majority the central committee dedicated * carrying it through. 4a Enthusiastic conferences and meet. ings of party members have been nel? { throughout the country—in factorie mines, schools, farin’co-ops, army units and among professional grouP®