British Columbia The issue was clear: defend women’s right to choice on abortion, or lose it. With that in mind, some 2,500 partici- pants marched through Vancouver streets March 4 in one of the most spi- rited International Women’s Day events in years. Hundreds braved threatening skies and cold temperatures to hear speakers at the rally, including Ald. Libby Davies of the Committee of Progressive Elec- tors, who said: “There are thousands more not here today who support choice on abortion. We are the majority.” Even as they spoke the B.C. Supreme Court was deliberating sentences for members of Rescue Canada, the anti- abortion organization whose members have been harassing patients and staff during several illegal blockades of the Everywoman’s Health Clinic in east Vancouver. The court handed three- month suspended sentences to most of the anti-abortionists Monday. Clinic spokesperson Joy Thompson told the rally that despite the anti- abortion activities, “the last gasp of a desperate, pious minority does not stop an idea whose time has come. No army or state has.” “Pm a minister, and I support pro- choice,” Rev. Linda Ervin of Vancouy- er’s First United Church declared to rs. as Everywoman’s Health Clinic opened its doors last November, less than a year after the Supreme Court of 2.500 rally for spi Canada struck abortion from the Crimi- nal Code. But rally speakers noted the obstacles women still face in the quest for control over the reproductive functions of their bodies. These include the provincial govern- ment’s refusal to fund support services for the clinic, the danger that an abortion law may be re-introduced, and the inter- ference of fanatical groups such as Rescue Canada, an offshoot of the U.S. group, Operation Rescue, speakers said. “We are demanding full funding for our clinic as a legitimate, essential medi- cal service for women,” Davies declared. Hilda Thomas of the B.C. Coalition for Abortion Clinics said women in Van- couver started the fight to remove abor- tion from Criminal Code, which included a 1970 trek to Ottawa where protesters chained themselves to the visitors gallery in the House of Commons. “That was an act of civil disobedience, yes. It means the right to fight oppressive laws. It does not mean the right to impose irrational, repressive moral sanc- tions on all women and all men,” she declared. Anne Harvey, an executive member of the B.C. Federation of Labour, said women were “not going to let a few fanatics stand in the way of our rights.” _ Jyoti Sanghera of India Mahala Asso- ciation, an Indo-Canadian women’s organization, issued “‘a challenge to the women’s movement here (to) incorpo- rate concerns of immigrant, women of rited IWD colour.” She said immigrant women are often those who are the “invisible part of a - visible minority” working in farm fields and cleaning office buildings at night, in unorganized, low-paid jobs. Sanghera said her organization sup- ports the pro-choice position: “Pro- choice must be a fundamental principle Banner calling for full funding for abortion clinics heads International Women’s Day march through downtown Vancouver on March 8. of a people who uphold democracy, lib- erty and equality.” Several organizations and individuals sent greetings, including NDP MPs and MLAs, the United Church, and women’s organizations including the Congress of Canadian Women and the women’s commission of the Communist Party. Parker bombarded with demand for inquiry Forests Minister Dave Parker continued to be bombarded with the demand that he move immediately to convene a royal commission inquiry into. the province’s forest industry as the ministry's “public information sessions” moved into Van- couver Wednesday. 3 Several hundred people packed a ball- room at the Westin Bayshore March 8 to hear some 60 interveners state their posi- tions on the government s plans to double the amount of timber under Tree Farm Licence and extend private control over vast areas of the pro- vince’s forest. The Vancouver hearing was the third in which: the government was com- pelled to add a morning session to accommodate the numbers of partici- pants requesting to : be heard. Despite PARKER. the additional ses- sion, the hearing continued into the early morning Thursday — a measure of the heat the government’s proposal has gener- ated. ; As with the six previous hearings held across the province, the overwhelming majority of interveners opposed the whole- sale extension of TFLs. But Parker’s comments made it clear that despite the resounding opposition given the TFL plan, it will take continuing public pressure to force the government to call an inquiry. Asked in the evening session if he could “continue to deny the need for an inquiry,” Parker replied flatly: “Yes.” During a question-and-answer exchange with Communist Party leader Maurice Rush, Parker also refused to indicate whether the government intends to proceed with applications for TFL extensions which have already been made to the ministry. Rush noted that the information sessions were being held after the legislation — Bill 28 — had already been passed. Parker, he said, had only been forced to hold off on implementation by the public outcry against TFL extensions in Mackenzie and Gold River. “Bill 28 and the plan to expand the Tree Farm Licence program to 67 per cent of the allowable cut would virtually complete the process of corporate domination of the of the forests of B.C.,” Rush warned in his later submission to Parker, “We urge that Bill 28 be repealed at the coming session of the legislature and the plan to expand the TEL program be abandoned.” _ Rush called for a full royal commission inquiry coupled with a “drastic overhaul of our forest economy.” He added that the demand for an inquiry, far from being limited to “Natives, environmentalists and the Opposition” as Parker has claimed, “has come from every segment of our society.” _ That was borne out Wednesday as Victo- ria businessman Derek Young joined the B.C. Government Employees Union, the Western Canada Wilderness Society, Pro- ject North and others in backing the call for a full inquiry into the forest industry. Young called the government’s proposal to extend TFLs “‘the greatest land grab of the century,” emphasizing that the current control of the forest industry by multina- tional corporations had led to a decline in long term employment and declining revenue to the province. “A full public inquiry is the only way to respond to the public alarm,” he said. Dr. Tom Perry, New Democrat candi- date in the Point Grey byelection, told Parker in as detailed submission that the changeover in the forest industry from competitive bidding to land tenure systems had been accompanied by massive corpo- rate concentration of ownership. And because most of the major companies are owned outside the province, the concentra- tion “has led to a loss of revenue through tax credits, interest payments and payments to parent companies,” he said. If forest licences were converted to TFLs as the government’s plans, he said, those same companies would gain vast new assets in increased land values — some $1.2 bil- lion worth. But those assets would probably be siphoned off outside the province as well, he said. Dr. Perry also noted that the extension of TFLs would result in more control of the forest passing into the hands of private companies “‘with each licensee getting to write his own ticket.” In fact, that privatization has already taken place ona major scale, BCGEU vice- president George Heyman told Parker. Forest technicians have been cut from 1,300 to 700 in the past five years, he said, while log scaling and timber cruising — measur- ing the volume of timber and taking inven- tory of the forest, respectively — has been virtually given up to private companies. “The BCGEU supports the call from a number of groups for a royal commission into the B.C. forest industry,” Heyman said. “There are a number of crucial issues which must be the subject of an independ- ent review process before a decision is made to turn over additional vast tracts of Crown lands and forests to private tenure.” Project North, a church-based coalition, also backed the call for an inquiry, warning that the government’s plans to extend TELS would put yet another obstacle in the way of settling Native land claims. Although he made no specific recom- mendations for changes, IWA-Canada representative Clay Perry was sharply criti- cal of the current TFL system. He noted that companies have been logging only the best timber — much of which is exported as raw logs — and have emphasized the. profitable pulp sector of the industry at the expense of jobs and government revenues that could come from value-added solid wood pro;ducts. He cited numerous TFLs where compan- PERRY ies had failed to carry out adequate refores- tation or had practiced wasteful logging, resulting in lost jobs and lost revenue to the province. He noted particularly the scandal on Vancouver Island where B.C. Forest Products — now owned by Filetcher- Challenge Canada — left hundreds of truckloads of timber from its TFL 46 on the ground to rot while it creamed the best logs. Ironically, Fletcher-Challenge was one of several major multinational companies which appeared before Parker during the hearings Wednesday morning to support the TFL extension program and to emphas- ize their commitment to stable employment and good forestry practices. In his submission, Jack Toovey, vice- president of timberlands and forestry for Fletcher Challenge Canada, praised his own and predecessor companies’ 31 years of management of Tree Farm Licence 46. “In fact,” he said, ““Tree Farm Licence 46 is one of the best managed tenures in Can- ada.” Last year, the company was fined $57,000 for its wasteful logging practices on TFL 46 — but only after loggers had drawn the problem to the attention of the forest ministry. Parker was to convene the final hearing on Friday in Parksville. Hundreds of woodworkers facing the loss of their jobs at Fletcher-Challenge operations were expec- ted to appear to demand that the minister take action to halt the layoffs. Pacific Tribune, March 13, 1989 « 3