Newspaper editors ate interest- ing creatures. I’ve always pic- tured editors as a gruff, grumbl- ing overweight species — kind of rumpled-looking, with five o’clock shadows and cigar stubs clenched in their teeth. Yes, the female ones, too. Real editors aren’t like that. The editor of this paper is.actually fairly normal in appearance — that is, children don’t shriek in horror when he enters a room. Notice that I don’t mention his name. That’s because he’s never fully explained the legalities of libel and slander, nor the standard length of the resulting prison sentences, though I've asked a few times. His name is listed on page six, anyway. For the pur- pose of this column, we’ll just cali him... hmmm, let’s see, pick any name out of the air. We'll call him "Mike". Mike is often found hiding in a dark commer of the office, hunched over a keyboard or mumbling into a phone. This is common newspaper practice, keeping the Down through the ages there have been “experts” on just about every conceivable subject under the sun. And while some of these people actually seemed to know what they were talking about, there are thousands of examples of misinformation, disinformation, misunderstanding, miscalculation, prognostication, and even a few outright boo-boos and plain old lies, At the Institute of Expertology in New York, New York, they’ve discovered that the experts are wrong without regard to race, creed, colour, sex, discipline, spe- cialty, country, culture, or century. Furthermore, they are wrong about theories, dates, geography, both the future and the past, and at best are misleading about the present, not to mention neat week. The institute does not claim that all experts everywhere are always wrong; although their scientifical- ly selected random sample has yet to turn up an expert who is actual- ly right, they do concede that the experts are occasionally right, maybe even as much as half the time. But it’s the other half of the time that makes for some interest- ing reading. For example: The Saturday Review in London in 1858 said of Charles Dickens (author of A Christmas Carol), “We do not believe in the perma- nence of his reputation.” William Styron, McGraw-Hill editor, rejected Thor Heyerdahl’s novel Kon-Tiki in 1947 because, “This is a long, solemn, tedious 8 Terrace Reviews — Wednesday. November 13, 1991 editor away from the scrutinizing eyes of the public. And Mike’s pretty busy — there’s always a deadline hanging over his head — but he doesn’t snarl at inter- Tuptions, a suspicious virtue if you ask me. Through the four years I’ve worked with Mike, I’ve noticed that he thinks a lot. He thinks more than he speaks, a character- istic I hopelessly aspire toward. Because of all this thinking, he occasionally utters profound words of wisdom, also known as "Mikeisms". While he’s spouting these "Mikeisms" around the office, much of the staff ignores him, particularly when there’s cookies near the coffee pot. (Cookies in the office override most other priorities.) Not me. Besides the fact that I recognize brilliance when I see it, he’s my boss and I value my continuing employment. What follows are some Mikeisms that come to mind: Mikeism #1 "Everything is the editor’s fault.” Mike once said BS cb TRAST See Pacific voyage best suited, I would think, to some kind of drastic abridgement in a journal like the National Geographic.” (Rand McNally published the novel, which immediately leapt to the top of the New York Times bestseller list, and stayed there for more than a year). «Hans Friedenthal, professor at Berlin University in 1914 said, “Brain work will cause her (the new woman) to become bald, while increasing masculinity and contempt for beauty will induce the growth of hair on the face, In the future, therefore, women will be bald and will long mustaches and patriarchal beards.” «Dr, Benjamin Spock, American pediatrician, was quoted in 1979 as saying, “Biologically and tem- peramentally... women were made — to be concerned first and foremost with child care, husband and home care,” eCharles Taze Russell, American religious leader, 1910, “The deliv- erance of the saints must take place some time before 1914.” «Charles Taze Russell, 1923, “The deliverance of the saints must take place some time after 1914,” *A Decca Recording Company executive said of the Beatles in 1962, “We don’t like their sound. Groups of guitars are on the way out.” Jim Denny, manager of the Grand Ole Opry, who fired Elvis Presicy after only one perfor- this with a shrug, when he was wrongly accused of journalistic fault. It made sense, Ever since, I have attributed everything, from flash floods and earthquakes to - starving third world countries, to editors — namely, Mike. Mikeism #2 "There is no sen- tence too short." That’s an exact quote. I didn’t have the heart to tell him it could be condensed to "No sentence is too short.” Mikeism #3 "Oh." This is Mike’s favourite "ism". Give Mike a tantalizing crumb of earth-shattering. news, and his inevitable reaction is a non-com- mittal "oh", stretched out to two syllables. Any further curiosity is expressed as "Oh?", accompanied by a raised eyebrow. This way, Mike keeps his opinion to him- self. Or it may simply relate to the above short-sentence quirk. There have been other, more -worldly Mikeisms uttered, but for some reason, these stuck like gum on a shoe. And I figure Mike has covered the basic rules of news-reporting with those three points: The editor is the boss, Keep it short. Leave your own opinion out of it. Of course, none of the above applies to this column, where I’m pretty much allowed free reign, within twenty column inches. And it’s always my opinion. Mike will see this before you do, and he may hesitate to print it. But he doesn’t have anything else under the heading of "The On top of that, what does the God of the Bible think about Laurel Gregg, her family and her friends? They are deeply loved by God. “For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life.” (Qohn 3:16) If God loves them how can we do anything else. So let’s be very clear on one thing: most of the actions toward Laurel Gregg, her family and her friends as they were described in the Terrace Review are not Chris- tianity at all; therefore I, and any Bible believing Christian, would denounce such actions for what they are. Shortly after I put on the New Age Seminar I called Laurel and we talked about the harassment she said she had been getting in the previous months. I gave her my name and phone number and told her that is she found out who these people were that I would personally defend her and her family against such people and such actions, I think it is important to note just ‘ for the record, that in the six hours ; of our New Age Seminar, which mance, said in 1954,“You ain't covered a very wide range of goin’ nowhere... son. You ought to metaphysical activities, organiza- PIER Mires sb eotear Ee OH go back to drivin’ a trick.” The New York Daily News assessed the talents of Willie Mays in 1951 as, “Just so-so in centre field.” *Tris Speaker, manager of the Cleveland Indians, commented in 1921 on Babe Ruth’s plans to change from a pitcher to an out- fielder, “Ruth made a great mis- take when he gave up pitching. Working once a week, he might have lasted a long time and become a great star.” Gardiner Greene Hubbard in assessing the telephone invented by his prospective son-in-law, Alexander Graham Bell, “Only a toy.” He urged Bell to devote his time to other pursuits. Editor of the Daily Express, London, refusing to see John Logie Baird (inventor of the tele- vision), “For God’s sake go down to reception and get rid of a lunatic who’s down there, He says he’s got a machine for seeing by . wireless! Watch him — he may have a razor on him.” Dr. S.L. Katzoff, faculty member of San Francisco Institute of Human Relations, 1940, said, (in response to the question: Can kiss- ing transmit contagious diseases?): “A genuine kiss generates so much heat it destroys germs.” So there you have it, the lesson here is to take the experts with a grain of salt. And that's my “expert” opinion! tions and philosophies, Nirvana Metaphysics came up only once as a 30-second note in passing. Lau- rel and her centre certainly were not “one of the topics of discus- sion”. Contrary to the information given Laurel as to the availability of some tapes of the seminar, we have never released any tapes to ‘the public or to anyone else, but we do hope to be able to produce some in time. If anyone is really interested, Laurel and her friends included, we are holding another New Age Seminar in Kitimat on Nov. 15 at 7 p.m., and Nov. 16-at 9 a.m. at the Riverlodge Commu- nity Centre, Canada, like it or not, is truly a pluralistic country, Canadian soci- ety is a society in which individu- als from diverse ethnic, racial, religious and social groups may freely maintain autonomous par- ticipation in, and development of, their traditional culture or special interests within our common civi- lization. We value this freedom and defend it, and the sad reality is, we will yet need to defend it. This is the freedom that enables Laurel to believe what she believes and practice what she practices. Many of my personal beliefs and the teachings of the Bible are diametrically opposed to Laurel's, but remember, it is that same freedom that enables me to practice Biblical Christianity or any other petson to pursue their Way I See It" and a blank space makes him look bad—re- member the "editor’s fault” rule. Which is why I’m allowed to pat Mike on the back in print, and let him know that some- body’s noticed his efforts. This follows my own rule: it never _ hurts to flatter the boss. Besides, there were no cookies in the office today. Ch ri sti ans _—_— Continued from page 7— beliefs. God himself gives man the freedom tho choose whom he will serve and he allows us to reap the consequences of our choices. Some who do as Peter did on the night Jesus gave His life for us, and strike out to harm those who came to take Him. After Peter had lopped off the ear of one of them (he wasn’t aiming for his ear), Jesus touched the man and healed him and then rebuked Peter say- ing, “All those who take the sword will die by the sword.” True Christianity, Bible-based Chris- tianity, forbids such violent actions, We are to be “‘wise as ser- pents and harmless as doves.” Matt 10:16. Does that mean we Christians sit silently in our ivory towers, while the world staggers and reels under the weight of corruption, crime, injustice, violence, perversions, greed, the disintegration of the family, broken homes and, might I say, a phenomenal upsurge of demonic activity promoted through elements of the music industry, Hollywood, and the most prolific barrage of Occult litera- ture in the history of the world? No, not in the least. Fortunately, we also live in a country that art stands for the right to freedom of speech, where groups and individ- vals can express their viewpoints and concerns in myriad ways about any number of potentially destructive activities and influ- ences that may be pressing upon our society. As Christians we too are very — much aware of the spirit world but we view it quite differently than Laurel and others who practice various metaphysical crafts, The bible clearly warns us that there are spirits who go about to seduce and delude people and who have their own doctrines and teachings. (I Tim 4:1) It also tells us that these spirits masquerade as angels of light. (I Cor 11:14) These spirit beings also are capable of per- forming “all kinds of counterfeit miracles, signs and wonders”. The bible actually talks a lot about channeling spirits, in fact, there are over 20 references to it in the Bible, every one strictly for- bidding it. Why? Because the Bible identifies the spirits who communicate through channeling as the one’s we know as evil or demonic, As christians we oppose the spir- its behind these activities, but we must love and treat with respect the people involved with them. Pastor Mike Rosenau, Terrace Christian Fellowship. Fe