ir 4 Sr A! 3

Ho ia of %¢ r . 4
‘ 3 4
a

to ota sata ag .
ACER LSI
JAN 17 1994-

JANUARY LOTH. 1994

CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM
2580 SHAUNESSEY ST.
PORT COQUITLAM.

RE.VARIANCE 67-93 LOT 11
DEAR COUNCILLORS,

I WOULD AT THIS TIME REGISTER A RESOUNDING NO TO THE ABOVE
VARIANCE BEING APPROVED.IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THE HEIGHT OF
A HOME ON RS-1 PROPERTY IS THIRTY SIX FEET IN HEIGHT.THIS
BUILDING WOULD THEREFORE REMOVE MY VIEW OF THE FRASER RIVER AND
THE PITT MEADOWS FLATS TO THE EAST OF MY PROPERTY.REAL ESTATE
VALUES ARE GREATLY ENHANCED BY VIEWS.

I ALSO FIND IT POOR TASTE FOR A DEVELOPER TO COME IN AND BUILD
RIGHT IN FRONT OF OTHER HOMES WHICH AT THE TIME OF PURCHASE WERE
TOLD THAT THERE WOUILD NEVER BE ANY DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY.

MY HOME IS MY LIPELONG INVESTMENT.WHY CAN THEY NOT BUILD WHERE
THE ORIGINAL PLAN WAS ?7COULD NOT THE DEVELOPMENT GO AHEAD WITH
THIS LOT BEING DONATED AS PARKLAND?WHAT IS TO BE ESTABLISHED AS
THE GRADE LEVEL? IF THE HEIGHT WAS RESTRICTED ON THE WHOLE
DEVELOPMENT THEN I WOULD NOT LOSE MY VIEW.POSSIBLY?WHO IS TO LOOK
APTER MY INTERESTS WHEN IT COMES TO THE LOST VALUE?

AGAIN 1 STRONGLY URGE YOU TO LOOK AT THE IMPACT THIS
DEVELOPMENT WILL HAVE ON THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES.

: CG. apt Vee

EITH CROCKER
26609 KLASSEN COURT
PORT COQUITLAM

MY VOTE IS NO

C.c.CITY CLERK
MAYOR TROUBALAY
PORT COQUITLAM.