HOUSANDS of articles in the capitalist press of the world have, in recent months, posed the question: “Is the Soviet Union really concerned with the promo- tion of world peace?” The authors have indulged in a series of speculations derived from ther own prejudices. They have refrained from examining what the Soviet government is really doing. It is a Safe rule to study not only what a government says but what a government does. The speeches in the Supreme Soviet, which has just been meet- ing, provide abundant material for commentators on the Soviet Union. Maybe the critics will con- sult this material more and their own prejudices less. : The essence of the policy an- nounced in the Supreme Soviet is: + The pursuit of negotiated agreements on all questions at is- sue between the great Powers. + The reduction of armaments as compared with last year. . * The switching of resources to ensure greatly increased sup- plies of consumer goods and high- grade foods to the Soviet people. The pursuit of the last two ob- jectives is only possible on the basis of the resolute pursuit of the first objective, of the nego- tiation of a series of peace settle- ments. The announcement that the So- viet Union has the hydrogen bomb has been overplayed by the millionaire press to such an ex- tent that it has obscured the tre- mendous importance of the gen- eral line of policy enunciated by the Soviet government. It is, of course, a pity that there is a hydrogen bomb at all. Given the existence of hydrogen bombs, however, most people will be glad that they are not all in the pos- session of trigger-happy American generals. The breaking of the American monopoly of the hydrogen bomb may be a prelude to a realistic international agreement on atomic energy. * The possibilities of a swift in- crease in the supply of consumer goods to the Soviet people is bas- ed on the tremendous develop- ment of heavy industry—particu- larly the steel and engineering industries—in the Soviet Union. This year the Soviet Union ' will produce 320 million tons of coal, 38 million tons of steel, and Now that the Soviet Union has the hydrogen bomb, stories are being circulated from Washington about a ‘“C-bomb” that could wipe out the world. Above is shown an artist’s conception of the H-bomb supposedly detonated by the United States some time ago at Eniwetok Atoll in the Pacific. Premier Malenkov addressing a meeting of the Supreme Soviet, Re ee See ee By J. R, CAMPBELL (age iat Te ee 133,000 million kilowatt hours of electricity. Soviet production of coal is 19 times what it was in 1924; steel 21 times; and electric power 45 - times. These tremendous achievements in heavy industry were not paral- leled by a similar development of consumer goods industries. The output of means of pro- duction is 55 times what it was in 1924. But the output of con- sumer goods only 12 times. Year after year, the Soviet Union has concentrated on the industries producing means of production. A great heavy indus- try foundation has been created. Now it is possible, while con- tinuing the development of heavy industry, to switch considerable resources to the industries pro- ducing consumer goods. There has to be more invest- ment in the food industry, in fish- eries, in agriculture and in con- sumer goods generally. There has to be a diversion of sections of the engineering and metal and other heavy industries to the production of consumer goods. It is clear that this policy can only be pursued by a government which is not only not preparing ‘for an aggressive war, but which is confident of achieving nego- tiated settlements everywhere. As part of this policy the So- viet Union is advocating the lift- ing of all restrictions hampering international trade, not only as a contribution to economic prosperi- ty but to a peaceful world. Great stress was laid in Malen- kov’s speech on the building of houses, hospitals, schools, nursery schools and children’s creches. School building is 30 percent, nursery schools and creches 40 percent, and hospitals 50 percent higher than last year. * It is impossible to deal with all aspects of foreign policy touched on by Malenkov. Here are the highlights: + The authority and role of the United Nations has to be strengthened. wd “Today this international ore anization has been reduced to be- ing one of the levers of the North Atlantic bloc,” said Malenkov. The attempt of Eisenhowel Dulles and Syngman Rhee to by- pass the United Nations with T gard to the forthcoming negotla tions on Korea is a glaring e© ample of this. ; i + Contrary to the United States policy, the Soviet Union does not seek to interfere in the internal affairs of other countries and to deny them’ their interlé tional rights. : So the Soviet Union demands that the Chinese People’s Repub lic be given its lawful place in ‘ the United Nations. To keep China out harms China; reduces the status of the Unit Nations. and endangers world — peace. ‘+ In no Soviet speech of T& cent years has there been SUuC a sharp rebuke to the Western — imperialists who are rebuildiné German militarism: ‘ “They want us to agree to the re-birth of an aggressive militat- ist Germany and at the same t pe allow themselves to talk of Le suring peace in Europe. pe : ever, our people» did not se the blood of millions of its pi and daughters in order to rest once more this dangerous 0 bed of war in Europe.” : + Peaceful agreements 02 dis: puted issues must recognize People’s revolutions in Asia # in Europe: “He who does not understand that 800 million people, consti ing the great family of pel a of the countries belonging to democratic camp cannot be C0) pelled to abandon their histor. achievements, won with aa blood and sweat, to abandon Mt own people’s power, an Ry establish the regime of exploit ers, simply places himself 1? foolish situation. A “He who wants to conduct, sober policy of international sues must stand on the grount -- stark reality, on the groum 4 facts, be they pleasant oF no ons The British and Canadian es ple, too, want a peace policy ed on reality. . in They should, therefore, at a the peace policy which has & ta ed from the Supreme Sov t policy which goes far tO 74). their desires for an advance wards a world without wal- i Skirting imbecility ——— URING our time we’ve read some pretty weird statements. from banal apologists for capit- alist economics but it is obvious that Stanley N. Jones, president of thé Winnipeg Grain Exchange, is a man who is satisfied with noth- ing less than perfection as he strives to be voted the person most likely to open his mouth and mumble gibberish. Canada is loaded down with wheat left over from last year’s crop and the outlook is that the farmers are going to be stuck with millions more bushels from this year’s harvest. A few mal- contents, both from right, left and centre, have suggested the wheat could be moved, the farmer paid a better price and the market stabilized, by trading with the world. This opinion is based on logic, something which Mr. Jones seems to view as being in bad taste, for in a brilliant analysis of the wheat market he brings forward the su: perior judgment that its ups and downs are hitched to the hemlines of women’s skirts. This is .a By MEL COLBY serious observation on the part of the president of the Winnipeg Grain Exchange and is not to be confused with entries in-an im- becility contest. “The higher the skirt, the lower the (wheat) market,” Mr. Jones said last week in a serious com- ment on the fashion designer’s plan to raise hemlines to their prewar level of just below the knee. However, wanting to be fair, not wanting to allow the slightest new trend in capitalist economics to escape unexamined, we gave J. K. Snagsby a roving commis- sion to inquire into the effect wo- men’s wearing apparel is having on the market price of basic com- modities. “Find out,” we told him grim- ly, “to what extent women are wrecking our economic system.” x * * Snagsby has since brought in his findings. His report is one of extreme sensitivity and in it he neither rants, rails nor com- plains. He has presented the facts exactly as he found them, fake aie at without dramatics heroics: women are 10 w sponsible for the fall in ay market but must also take“ seel sibility for the increase ? sntio® and coal prices, not t0 ine oY rubber, uranium and bean. . - ae But let’s: settle the 389% is wheat. It seems that WRC) oom are shortened the Wester gr aid ers keep making trips t0 stone elevators, ostensibly 0 ‘ wheat, but actually to rae New town in order to ogle Look. This jams the ©. ses with unsold wheat and hen slump in the market. Ww =i pot lines are long the farms apy interested in making © ice he visits to the elevators Dect © jyst hasn’t got the incentive | the ile u lets the wheat ols: ortage fields, causes a § me bumps up the markets | go wit! “Absolutely nothin€ 4 snag world markets?” we @ ee by sharply. 0 "He ont aside the paper = told was cutting. “Nothing, us firmly, ; pace '° PACIFIC TRIBUNE — AUGUST 28, 1953 — ae