office. 8 some of the arguments aud warrants for elements of the Plan B
network pertain to arcas beyond the Port Coquitlam boundaries, the larger

.coverage plan is used. As can be seen, cur sugesested network designates

major arterials (in red) and minor arterdtals (Cin yellow). Differentiation
between major and minor arterials is based on facility spacing, route
continuity, anticlpated traffic operation controls, degree of land access
control, parking - loading restrictions, ete., and would influence opti-
mum right-of-way provisions and road cross section development. |

Based on differences between Plan A and Plan B plus discussions during

our February meeting, the following comments are offered far yeur con-
Sideration (attached Plan © identifies the individual links for comments).

A. Major Arterials

Fremont Street northward extension to Victoria Drive

~ outside of City but important implications

- only "if and when" required by burke Mountain developmert
Coast Meridian crossing of C,P.R.

~ agreed that this suggestion is very speculative but
our time frame is very long term and land values, land
development, travel demands, and C.P.R. decisions may
combine to accommodate
this office urges the City to consider the Coast Meridian~
Broadway linkage as a potential long term Strategy and
not act in a manner that would further compromise this
potential

Shaughnessy Street extension north to Pathan - David line
~ outside of City but important implications

~ this appears consistent with City's major road network
objectives

Shaughnessy riverside couplet

~- additional north-south capacity, srade separated from the
C.P.R., is most important

~ thio requirement must be addressed In amenner that is
sympathetic to park use atoug the Coquitlam River

- 2 one-way couplet configuerarion is sungested as providing
the best combination of traffic flow attributes plus
flexibility to minimine new road Intrusion