April ath, 1974 oe BL

co-operative planning with the Port Coqustian ‘Senior Secondary School Adult Bduea~
tion Departnent, advising that since this report was given, the co-operative plan-
ning is being extended to the Junior Secondary Schools and ‘the Elementary Schools,

and stating the Committee fuels that this joint planning has set the Chey" s program

ahead of many other comnunities by these co-operative measures.

— Biovea 2y Alderman aking:

Seconded by Alderman Teaboulay:

That as recommended in a report from the Parks & Recreation Conmittee, April
5th, 1974, where the Recreation Department has negotiated sharing axrangenents with
schools; that the Department be empowered to provide for such schools some free
time at the arena during the normal - school “day; as the school times would not ‘inter-
fere with the recreation prograns already in existence, be approved. carried, .
From the Planning & Zoning Committee, April Sth, 1974, concerning Application Ping. &Zon.”
: Com.Appln.
RIG 74 to rezone property located at 3385 to (3441 Hastings Street, prese ently zoned R#6-74
RS~ 1 (One-Family Residentiat) to Bevelopnent Area to permit comprehensive develop-
ment thereof, pointing out ‘that due to the fact that a creek traverses the proper
ty it would be aiffieult to subdivide inte residential lots, and advising that the
developer has submitted a proposal for a ‘Tow-housing development consisting of 40

strata title units confined to the Hasterly portion of the property with the ‘Westerly.

portion consisting of f aqroxinately 1s acres being dedicated to the City for park

purposes.

Moved by Alderman Ranger:

Seconded by Alderman Mabbett:

@

That as reconnended ina ‘Teport from the Planning ‘ Zoning Conmittee, sprit
5th, 1974, ‘Appl caton Ri6~ 74. to rezone > property located at 3385, 3391, +3397, 3425,
and 3441 Hastings Street from RS~1 (One-Fanily Residential) and d designate the same
as a Development Area to permit comprehensive development « of a 37-unit strata title
row-housing project be approved for further consideration and that the proposal be

referred to the appropriate Committees of Council for their comments. Carried,
Aldermen . Keryluk, Laking, and Traboulay voted against the- resolution.

Prior to passage of the foregoing. resolution, a discussion. ensued, and Alderman,
Ranger stated that the function of the Planning. & Zoning Committed. is to try and
present the highest and best use of land, and: he. ‘pointed out that the Proposed pro-

ject wouid ‘bring housing together without crowding | green spaces or alienating the

“creek. Alderman Ranger commented that the Committee felt the 40-unit: proposal sub-

mitted was slightly high. dn that it would result ina gross density ef 8.3 units
per acre and that by removing three units as: suggested in the Fepore | the density

would be reduced to 7.6 units per acre, The Architect ef the project was in