- Security Council, The speech the dailies didn’t print — feels it necessary to state only that the very raising of this question is devoid of any foun- dation. The charges made by the Am- erican delegation against Yugo- -slavia, Bulgaria and Albania are utterly arbitrary and without any proof. These charges go much further than the conclusions of the majority of the commission, which were not supported by al- most 50 percent of the members of the commission and which do not stand any criticism if one is to take any serious approach to the data. on which the con- clusions are based. It will not be difficult te prove that the report of the majority of the commission on the so- called Greek question is full of contradictions and gross exagger- ations which deprive those con- clusions of any importance whatsoever. MARSHALL'S address raises new questions as well. " The Korean question, Having arbitrarily outlined the situation in such a way that the futility of the work of the Joint Soviet- American Commission on Korea happens to be attributed to the Soviet side, Mr. Marshall makes a proposal which is a direct vio- lation of the Moscow Agreement on Korea reached by the three Foreign Ministers in December, 1945. _ The USA and USSR undertook according to this agreement to prepare a joint solution of the problem of the unification of Korea into one independent dem- ecratic state. The new proposal - made by Mr. Marshall is a viola- tion of the obligations assumed upon itself by the USA and for this reason is not the right one or acceptable. The U.S. government prefers instead of undertaking arrange- ments for shaping out adopted “measures according to the Mos- cow Agreement on Korea on De- cember, 1945, and submitting them to the joint consideration by the governments of the U.S., _ USSR, Great Britain and China, to violate its undertakings in an attempt to conceal by the pres- tige of the General Assembly its unilateral and by no means justi- fied action. : : The Soviet government cannot - gecept such a violation of the said agreement on Korea and will insist that the proposal made - by Mr. Marshall should be re- _ jected, for the reason that it is contrary to the obligations as- sumed under the tripartite agree- ment on Korea. . MARSHALL spropowes to : establish a standing com- mittee of the General Assembly under the title of “the Interim _ Committee of the United: Na- tions General Assembly = on Peace and Security” to main- tain “constant attention” to the work of _the Assembly and in erder to deal with continuing problems. In spite of the reservations in the American proposal effect that this committee would not impinge sibility of the Security. Council or of special commissioners there is not the slightest doubt that the attempt to create the Interim Committee is nothing but an_ ill-conceived scheme to substitute and by-pass the Seaurity Council. The functions of this commit- tee, whose task is to consider “situations and disputes impair- ‘ing friendly relations,” are noth- ing else but the functions of the particularly mentioned in the Article 34 of _ the Charter. Even by virtue of this situation alone these func- FRIDAY, OCTOBER 17, 1947 to: the ‘ ‘ on the matters — which are the primary respon- tions cannot be transferred to any other organ, no matter what its name is, without obvious and direct violation of the Charter of the United Nations, and of course, the Soviet delegation can in no way accept it and will energetically oppose it. -I repeat that if the sabove- mentioned new proposals as well as the old ones in a new form are submitted to the General Assembly by the American dele- gation, the Soviet delegation re- - serves its right to make a more detailed and elaborate analysis of these proposals at the time when the substance of these questions is examined, and will insist upon the rejection of these proposais, which are in disagree- ment with the principles, pur- poses and tasks of the United Nations organization, and the adoption of which could only undermine the very basis of the United Nations. Soviet delegation believes it necessary to raise at the General Assembly a very impor- “tant question concerning meas- ures against the propaganda of a new war increasing in a aum- ber of countries. More than two years have passed since the Charter of the United Nations Organization was signed in San Francisco and ratified subsequently by 52 na- tions. This Charter marked the beginning of activity of a new international association that set as its task, to insure the peace and security of nations, and the development and strengthening of international cooperation in crder to promote economic and social progress of* nations. The creation of the, United Na- tions organization dates back to “the period when the principal enemy of the democratic states— Hitlerite Germany—was_ defeat- ed and the day of the Japanese defeat was near. The attempt of these enemies of mankind to establish their world domina- tion was a complete failure be- cause of the historic victory of the democratic states with the Anglo - Soviet - American coalition at: the head. Two traditional hotbeds of war were destroyed. We wish to be sure that they are destroyed forever, that the task of complete disarmament of Germany and,Japan set down by the Allies will be brought to an end and that these states will never again ‘threaten free- dom-loving nations? with war and aggression. We wish to be sure that the severe lesson given to the ag- gressive states during the second world war has not passed away leaving no traces, and that the fate of the aggressors severely punished in the last war will serve as a stern warning to those who, disregarding their obligations to develop friendly — relation among the nations and strengthen peace and security in the whole world, are prepar- ing both secretly and openly a new war. ce WAR psychosis instigated by the efforts of the militar- ist and expansionist circles of certain countries, the United States of America occupying the foremost place among them, is continually spreading and as- suming an all the more menac- ing character. A furious campaign in the press, mainly in ‘American press, and in the press of the coun- tries “obediently following the USA, like Turkey, has been con- ducted for some time past for the purpose of moulding public opinion in favor of a new war. All. means of psychological in- fluence — newspapers, magazines, radio, cinema—have been used. This propaganda for a new war is being carried on under various flags and pretexts. Rut no matter how different the flags and pretexts, the essence of the whole propaganda remains the same: to justify the furious armament race in the USA, atomic weapons included, to jus- tify the limitless desires of the influential circles in the USA to fulfill the, expansionist plans, the keystone of which is @ crazy idea of world domination. Torrents of propaganda for @ new war and .appeals to prepare for it better and more expedi- ently, flow from the pages of © the American press. @ The third and concluding sec- tion of this address will appear in our feature section next week. ; - Picture of a | Wise Man os. about to save for the future. The way he’s going to save, of course, is through the new series of Canada Savings Bonds. And he knows he’s going to save it. He’s been taking advantage of his Company’s Payroll Savings Plan for years now, and his own experi- ence has shown him it’s the easy, certain way to save. His nest-eg¢ is growing steadily, surely. His sense : ae, of security and his freedom from worry are increasing day by day. You, too, can enjoy the satisfaction of building a greater back-log of savings by this simple systematic method. Canada Savings Bonds — will be on sale next week. You may purchase up to $1,000 in any one name (but no more) in the same convenient ways — for cash or by easy instalments. Don’t delay! ON SALE October 14th. through your Company’s Payroll Savings Plan, your Bank or. your In- vestment Dealer