= “si -Review * EDITORIAL PAGE * Cleanup long overdue HE return of Prime Minister Diefenbaker from the London | ~ Commonwealth conference to ad- dress the national Tory rally in Ottawa took on the aspect of a ‘conquering hero’ back from the fray. Before breaking into loud hur- - rahs for the P.M. and the ‘pill-of- rights’ tune he played in the - ouster of prime minister Hendrick. . Verwoerd’s ‘apartheid’ (race reg- - regationist) South Africa, it may be well to lay the cold-truth on the line; viz, that the prime power responsible for ousting racist South _ Africa from the British Common- ’ wealth was not the Diefs, but an outraged world opinion at the atrocities committed against. the Negro and Colored peoples of South Africa by a “white supremacist” ruling minority. With this mighty power standing by them, spokes- men for independent African com- monwealth states were able to de- mand that the horror of apartheid be excluded from the Common- wealth ... or else! It was that fact, and that alone which compelled the Diefs, wher- ever they came from, to ‘stand up and be counted.’ Even the sauve and slippery Macmillan of Britain, who worked long and tirelessly to hide Verwoerd’s racist crimes be- hind a flow of excellent English oratory and. back-room Tory scheming, didn’t dare flout the in- dependent nations of Black Africa or the mighty voice of universal world opinion. Gratified with the chief result of the Commonwealth conference, the ouster of racist South Africa, and quite willing to grant any ac- colades which may be due Dief for the part he played (with a fine show of self-righteousness) in this worthy decision, there are two items of pressing ‘unfinished busi- ness’ at home which should now be promptly attended to. The first is a thorough clean- ing out of that Ottawa Augean stable known as the Immigration Department, (including the chill- ing lady in charge) in order that prospective immigrants may be ad- mitted to Canada in accordance with needs, and none barred from coming to Canada because of racial origin or the color of their skins. Pacific Tribune Editor — TOM McEWEN Associate Editor — MAURICE RUSH Business Mgr. — OXANA BIGELOW Published weekly at Room 6 — 426 Main Street Vancouver 4, B.C. Phone MUtual 5-5288 Subscription Rates: One Year: $4.00 Six Months: $2.25 Canadian and Commonwealth countries (except Australia): $4.00 one year. Australia, United States and all other countries: $5.00 one year. Authorized as second class mail, Post Office Dept., Ottawa. — Secondly, while the Dief fever of ‘self-righteousness’ over apar- theid is still running high, it is timely to remind. ourselves (and him) of the ‘apartheid’ with all its attendent cruelties, neglect, dis- crimination and worse, which suc- cessive Liberal and: Tory admin- istrations have imposed upon the Native Indian people of Canada. If we have no ‘Sharpsville’ -mas- sacres to our credit in recent times, : we have something -equally . de- structive of a proud and - noble ~ people, something more cruel. — a slow death. by = extermination - through neglect, racial discrimina- tion, imposed ignorance, «disease, and “reservation” (apartheid) segregation, where the sufferings of our Indian people can be care- fully hidden away by Ottawa. Thus to condemn apartheid in faraway South Africa, but leave it to fester in our own land, is equally abhorrent to decent Canad- adians as is Verwoerd’s apartheid to the millions of Negro and Col- ored peoples of South Africa. Dief has recorded Canada’s ab- horrence of apartheid in South Africa because he didn’t dare do otherwise. For that much we are grateful. Now let’s begin in earnest to sweep its foul ideology (and practice) from our own land. A ‘do it ‘HILL 42’, aimed at depriving trade unions of the right of independent political action or the financial: support of political part- ies or candidates of their choice, may become ‘law’ this week. Aimed also -at.--enabling unprecedented government interference and dis- ruption in the internal affairs: of trade unions, Bill 42 represents one of ‘the most destructive weap- ons-ever. used by reactionary. gov- ernment against organized labor. Aside from wordy opposition to Bill 42 by CCF-MLA’s in the Leg- islature and on TV ‘interviews,’ the leadership of the British Co- ‘lumbia Federation of Labor, re- sponsible to nearly 100,000 trade unionists, has never even got off the ground in an effective chal- lenge to this Socred ‘corporate state’ bill. Speaking at a sweat-shop local union meeting this week one of these alleged labor ‘leaders’ put the’ case for the BCFL leadership in a nutshell when he stated: “Well brothers and sisters, there’s noth- ing we can do aboui it. We're stuck with it.” On the other hand the Socred argument, expounded often and loud by its youthful Labor Minister Peterson, is based on its touching v job concern for the political sail of labor. It wants to ‘protect’ ! members from having to sup?! political party or candidate % union’s choice; to protect " members during strike 4!) should a majority ‘hang toug! | a decent wage hike. Then the) ernment, under the provisi0l, Bill 42, can step in and bred strike under the pretext 0) tecting” the union memb The Socred ‘Bill 42’ is | barelled) Canadian. Cham Commerce legislation, desig™ hamstring labor in buildit®} own parliamentary alternall! the political parties of bis ness; and equally important, } voke governmental interft f and disruption in the field lective bargaining in an 4} to compel organized labor ~what the bosses ‘offer.’ Jubilant with their sucet) B.C. through an oblidging | government, big business © clamoring for Dief to foll0Y) with similar ball-and-chal") crees. Meanwhile labor !@) here and in Ottawa, still fatty No. 1 job demanded by the and-file; that of mounting af ince and nation-wide © offensive. _ Tom McEwen OUGHLY, well over three- R quarters of a million workers in Canada without a pay envelope, with nearly half that number com- pelled to exist on ‘‘welfare’”’ hand- outs and multi-government ‘sym- pathy.’ Percentage-wise our job- less even exceeds that of Uncle Sam’s official 514-million. At all levels of government our jobless receive vast quantities of “sympathy” while the, ‘“experts’’ juggle ‘“do-it-now” figures in a vain attempt to prove that unem- ployment is ‘a state of mind” rather than an inherent social tragedy. “Canada offers a new life... with unlimited opportunities.” So runs the headline on a full page yarn in a recent edition of the Newcastle - on - Tyne. Evening Chronicle. These “unlimited opportunities” are extolled by a recent immi- grant, one Allan Ross, now resi- dent in London, Ontario. The al- leged Ross blurb in the Evening Chronicle reminds us of the recent “Close-Up” TV tear-jerker hoax on the miseries of unemployment, in which everything was thrown into the emotional hopper — except an organized united stand-up fight against the monopoly belly-robbers and their yesman governments. From this British newspaper (undoubtedly one of many), we learn that the Canadian Immigra- tion Department is busy as a beaver showing films, interview- ing prospective immigrants, and expounding the “great prosperity” which Dief dangled before the Trish and British public during his recent safari in London. Of course “debt-free” Bennett did precisely the same on an earlier visit when he urged upon British blokes far and wide to “come on over and share our prosperity.” Our immigration cadgers have a formula for “success”, sung to the tune of Dief’s ‘prosperity’ Te Deum. "For the energetic and especial- ly the skilled worker, Canada offers opportunities of a new life in a great variety of directions... for those with the right outlook and ability, the scope is as chal- lenging as it is stimulating.” Bordering this ChTonicle “come- and-get-it” booster shot for the un- wary immigrant are the display advertisements of the big steamship and air transport sharks, with equally large ads by the immigra- tion brokers, the latter featuring Canadian films “free”, with Cana- dian government immigration ser- vice officials on hand to dish out the “prosperity” malarkey. “Consult the experts... abt this growing land of rich op? tunity” says one ad, offering ir fare prices’ and posh accomme tion, while the B.O.A.C. prom to “take good care of you.” doubt! : Reading the Chronicle “c0) hither” rhapsody with its ca dian Immigration Department so-profundo, it struck us that Pi haps our three-quarters of 4 lion jobless do lack somethiné ; “the right outlook and abilil?) We have known for a long Fr that organized labor in Cat® | employed and unemployed alr have the ability to put an e? if this evil of unemployment. Its ft “outlook” that has held "ij back, fostered disunity and 'f sion and made it easy for the ch | latans of big monopoly to reser workingman as a cipher rat than a human being. Now with this official g0¥ ment call to make it as “challe ing as it is stimulating,’ our # it ing army of jobless with the if backing of labor should do / that. By mass demonstration® 4 fore all seats of government if constant reminder that pay no and not relief rolls are the e5% | of community “prosperity”; “1 ef! labor and the people to kick monopoly windbags out of il seats of power; that will m@) jj “challenging and stimulatin® a big way. March 24, 1961—PACIFIC TRIBUN pt