AG. Terrace Review ~_ Wednesday, October 17; 1990 _ EDITORIAL do as they wish with deeded ground, is one of the basic conventions of our society, often reaffirmed with solemn and somewhat tired cliche "a man’s home is his castle”. But what about the man from a distant kingdom who buys the castle and sends in the bulldozers? It seems remarkable that a proposal for a subdivision is subjected to minute scrutiny by city authorities and that deve- lopers are made to stand up and reply to all comers at public hearings, yet a massive tract of undeveloped property within the municipal boundaries can be stripped of timber without so much as a single clearance or notification to the city or any other authority required. To people who live here, things seem out of control when the forest next door is pillaged by some stranger who has no responsibility other than slash removal for what is left behind. Weil, if things seem to be out of control, that’s because they are. Both the Ministry of Forests and our municipal council, for historical reasons, are fearful of looking too closely at either logging or development. The boom and bust cycles that encompass both the forest industry and city development have gotten council out of the habit of saying "no" and made any- thing to do with logging virtually unassailable. Both agencies were unprepared for the extended spate of economic prosperity that we seem to be making our way out of, with the help of the federal government, and the events taking place this week on District Lot 978 bring the shortcomings of both into clear focus. The efforts of existing pulp and timber mills to seek fresh supplies of wood are now bordering on desperation, and as a result treed parcels of private land and — let’s get it out front — Crown agricultural leases are being snapped up by com- panies with suitable equipment, logged, and flipped over with a minimal clean-up effort. It’s time the Ministry. of Forests took another look at its hands-off: policy toward. logging on private’ land; ministry figures for cut and mill production for 1989 show that one log out of every five that went through B.C. mills came from areas other than Crown forest lands, areas _ outside sustained yield regulation. ' Although council can legally do nothing to hait the chain of events on District Lot 978 — and perhaps there is no reason to, if the owner’s intentions for a subdivision are carried out —~ anyone who walks into this town to clear-cut 80 acres in an established residential area should be required to present some- thing more than a deed and some ephemeral intentions. T he sanctity of private property, the rights of owners to Second-class mail registration No. 6896. All material appearing in the Terrace Review is profactad under Canadian copyright Aegistra- flon No, 362775 and cannot jagally be repro- duced for any reason without permission of the publisher. Errors and omissions, Advertising is accepted on the condition that In the event of typographical error, that portian of the advertis- ing space occupied by the arroneoys itam will not be charged for, but the balance of the adver- tlsamant wlil be paid for at the applicable rate. Advertisers must assume responsibility for er- rors in any classified ad whichis supplied to the Tarrace Review in handwritten form. In compliance with the B.C, Human Rights Act, no advertisement will be published which discriminates against a parson due to aga, face, raligion, color, sex, nationality, ancestry or place of origin. Established May 1, 1985 The Terrace Review Is published each Wednesday by Close-Up Business Services Ltd. Publisher: Mark Twyford Editor: Michael! Kelly Staff Reporters: Tod Strachan, Betty Barton Advertising: Marj Twyford, Todd Vogt Typesetting: Carrie Cison | . Production Manager: Jim Hall Production: Charles Costello, Gurbax Gill, Linda Mercer, Ranjit Nizar Office: . Carrle Olson Accounting: Marj Twyford, Harminder K. Dosanjh 4535 Grelg Avenue, Terrace, B.C, V8G 1M7 ‘Phone: 635-7840 Fax: 635-7269 One year subscriptions: In Canada $39.00 Out of Canada $100.00 Seniors In Terrace and District $30.00 Seniors oul of Terrace and District $33.00 a a Letters to the editor will be considered for publication only when signed. Please Include your telephone number. The editor reserves the right to condense and edit letters. Opinions: expressed are not necessarily those ot the Terrace Review. cm WIDIEEOFRS USN EAN ue SN Hd oe SSNS WH ASN VANCOUVER — One thing which was consistent — and predictable — about this year’s Social Credit Party convention last weekend was who the prin- cipal target was. No, it was not the New Democratic Party opposition (although it and leader Mike Harcourt are getting bashed around pretty well); it was The Media. Led by their premier, Bill Vander Zalm, Socreds of all stripes, from Cabinet ministers and delegates, to young Socreds reeling from being labelled as ‘‘fascists’’ and ‘““brownshirts’’ by one irrespon- sible Province writer, many of them were, and still are, mad as hell at us. And on Friday, some decided they were not going to take it any more. They presented a motion to have the media ousted from the convention during debate on the constitution and amendments to the Christian principles clause. It very nearly succeed- ed. In fact, had it not been for the quick thinking of the wily political veteran Grace McCar- thy, spurred on by the Zalm’s principal secretary Jerry . Lampert, it would have. Im- agine the image of a party allegedly in favour of ‘open . government”’ trying to ban the press! After the first motion passed — including support from Richmond delegate Lillian Vander Zalm — saner and much wiser heads prevailed. Even the most naive political — _ people realized just how close they had come to looking very, Nl! _) THOUGHT THERE Wis The view from Victoria — by John Pifer very , stupid, A second vote taken after McCarthy challenged the first - count was narrowly defeated, much to the relief of the MLAs. But it won’t end there as long as Mr. Vander Zalm is in the chair. One prominent Cabinet minister told me the media was “out of control’ in its attacks on Mr. Vander Zalm, and there was no group with any powers to curb it or to penalize it. The inference formed was that freedom of the press or no freedom of the press, maybe the government itself would have to step in to set up and to enforce a code of ethics for the press. The Premier himself has spent considerable energy in lambasting the media, or refus- ing to respond to our questions unless we asked about what he deemed to be the issue or topic of the day. ° This is such an exceptional contrast from the man who just four, no, three short years ago eagerly sought the spotlight at every opportunity — whether to shill for Fantasy Gardens or merely to announce govern- ment plans and policies. Please note, dear readers, that quite simply, there is no great conspiring entity out there called the media, with its own private agenda. I'll tell you why. In the press gallery alone there are journalists who have little regard for some of their colleagues’ work. The same at- titude prevails in the highly- competitive world i in Van- couver. It just is not all buddy-buddy and ‘‘how will we get this. guy?’’ plotting. Expecting ‘‘the media’’ to be capable of collectively conduct- ing a vendetta against anyone or anything is laughable — yet that is what Mr. Vander Zalm wants you to believe, as he spelled out in his somewhat sanctimonious seven-page letter which tried to explain or to ex- cuse the Fantasy Gardens fiasco. The premier is looking everywhere except in the mirror in his search of someone to blame for the devastating political damage he has . wrought through the apparent abuse of his office to unload his principal private financial burden, It has derailed an election . which Social Credit might have had some hope of turning into a contest, despite the internal backbiting of the past two or three years. Now, few old-party Socreds honestly believe that the party would be lucky to garner 25 of the 75 seats (and even that’s being generous). Mr. (and Mrs.) Vander Zalm’s belief that unloading Fantasyland in the manner they did would solve their problems, personally and politically, has angered his caucus members, party workers, and even strong supporters, jet alone the general public: And there is every indication that the whole story has not yet emerged about the sale, or , about the Taiwanese buyers, or about the very lenient financial’ — Continued on page A7 in TEETH SREY PEA TE