Sr eer scones ere ENE One ey Sa haa cera ia ee: Ye ET Teae ong Tse ae Re TAI a em ag _ Page ‘Ad'—-Terrace Standard, Wednesday, July 17, 1991 spemmmtmemseante meray - fh Gy raneanimretac ea : see ical. Mereatn, ts and psn | '$ special hanks t to a our: contributors, and: "correspondents for pon time: ONd ge: _ -ainy of them. Do they all outlive - George Burns? or does society stockpile theif remains for even- — Sheridan‘ took | one piece of folk wisdom. _ too'-far at the July 9 council meeting. os They did obey the tenet that if you can’t _ Say. anything nice about anybody, don’t ‘Say anything at all. But they also walked “out of the meeting. | Their departures came as three people from the audience spoke about the plan- "ned Orenda Forest Products pulp and ‘paper mill south of Lakelse Lake. And - because of the departures, council lacked @ quorum and the meeting ended. ‘The action was more akin to that of . children who, not getting their way, picking up their toys’ and leaving the sandbox. It’s not something expected of ‘people elected to represent the city. What those three people had to say ‘concerned the role of the city in the pro- vincial approval process Orenda must follow. While some of the presentations might not have been exactly moderate, the departure of alderman Cooper and Sheridan was plain rude. ’ In the case of Mr. Sheridan, it is ‘leo puzzling. Mr. Sheridan had no problem © several nights before the council meeting at the chamber of commerce’s installa- tion banquet. He gave an old-fashioned, Somewhat emotional but very entertain- ing tub-thusmper: Of.a, specel about, the. Orenda project. .. won It. is, Mr. Sheridan said, the’ biggest thing ever to hit the city. He warned that the forces of darkness and evil are mar- shalling their resources. He said the pro- ject ‘won’t -happen unless the. chamber participates. Too bad Mr. Sheridan didn’t hang around the council meeting. It was a speech worth repeating. He and alderman Cooper had. the- perfect opportunity .to ‘state the .city’s position. And that, it seems, is a request to Orenda and to the provincial govern- ment to provide all the information needed about the: project: and to ensure - . " that citizens of the city and area are in- | McCarthy volved and made aware of the Approval process. The Orenda project will go. “through the provincial: review. The ‘first step of that is an’ examination by government agencies. The company will also hold public meetings to explain the project. And the public will have a chance to res- pond. Those responses will be con- sidered by Orenda and by the province. — ‘All council had to do was explain that ‘to the people at the meeting. All it had to do was state it would bird dog that pro- cess to determine if a more detailed ex- amination — one that’s provided for in the approval process — is required.. Instead, the duo chose to declare war. before they or anybody else determines there is just cause to shine up their ar- mour and saddle up their trusty steed. What must Orenda be thinking? It surely doesn’t need a modern-day version of the Crusades. The last thing needed here aré- ideological: ‘Aniights ' ‘of the’ ‘council table. It isn’t a good sign for this council which will be expected to show some leadership as the Orenda approval Pro: cess begins, _ Then again, it seems to be following a a pattern of a council which lately seems to” be ignoring several. important issues. here must be more obnox- The other side VICTORIA. -_ “Hoping for. . ~ the Best’ might be an apt ’ slogan for the Social Credit. - leadership convention. being: . held at Vancouver’s Trade: and Convention centre this week. : “Mission Impossible’?is ©". another one I'd like to submit for consideration. - The five candidates have. ; been telling-us a lot about their ' devotion. to-integrity» hotest: | ‘and fairness, all ofwhigh ‘may | well be true, but the foremost - task facing the new leader is to - erase memories of Bill Vander Zalm. It's an awesome task, con- sidering that all five candidates had roles in the political drama that played to bewildered au- diences in B.C. for nearly five years, True, some played minor roles, others left the cast before the final curtain, but all ' . five were on stage at one time or another. » Of the five candidates, ; * Premier ‘Jotinston i is. probably. so-and-so! s than .the few | emiet, yet none of them ever seems to croak. Al least I never ‘hear of. funerals being held for Through | Bifocals —. by Claudette Sandecki ‘victims: are ‘lauded by: ‘tances and kin, ‘always. bubbly; optimistic, and : had. a smile on her t face,'" sobs. a. pat ‘tual | disposal. But disposal how? -) Are they secretly eased along ‘to their final resting placecloak- - ed in euphemisms designed to ~~ gloss: over their offensive ature? For example, rather = than admit someone was a ‘Miser, do we brag of: the, _Sizeable legacy she husbanded for her heirs. Or if a father walked out on his toddlers leay- -ing them to get ‘by on welfare, do we boast ‘he _faught his ‘children’ to. stand on their own two feet. - ‘. Maybe as rigor mortis stiffens: “the corpse, a spiritual alchemy selectively efases uncharitable- ~ thoughts from the memories of. all. who knew him, the way aCD player. can’ be programmed to -skip over tunes. _ ~~}. Certainly: nasties: ‘don’t bite the dust accidentally, judging ‘from news reports of fatal plane crashes and traffic mishaps, ’ - Media: accounts could lead us to Conclude that accidental death - befalls only the affable, or that the likable are particularly acci- Bent prone, ~ ‘Without exception, , accident _ beautiful lady, dignified, refin- ed’" weeps a niece. With emergency sirens still echoing in their ears, only.aclod would blurt, ‘‘She never recycl- ed,”’ Obituaries, too, invariably - Claim the deceased will be great-- ly missed. Sure, but by whom.. A stock broker, A tobacconist, But’ co-workers may: deem it high time he shuffled off his mortal coil before they choked him withit, - I know, | know: Ir’ you can ‘t say something nice.., . Either: death so outrages us. d we glorifyall victims as an an- - tidote. to-‘our helplessness, or we're too’ chicken to “call them . likes . we sees them**. The old “Don't kick them when they’re down" rule.) At: funerals, ‘every dear departed ig: praised: to the skies, as if our soft soap can grease theig ath ; tothe hereafter. In truth, we're probably working to guarantee our own reception’. at the Pearly Gates. By lionizing those who go before us, We” Hope = when our ti a one inwilling to share their cloud wit us businessman of the year,: George Clark. In San Diego, Canadian cartoonist Lynn’ Johnston received. the prestigious Ink Pot award : for her syndicated comic strip, For Better or. For Worse, printed in 800 newspapers. io Both. Clark and Johnston have’ been. acclaimed for being all. they. ‘can. be, to. paraphrase’ Rick Hansen. But most of us will never: know haw good, we. are until’ we’ re eulogized at our. funeral. “Woody Allen says, “Death i nuke, asn’t scare. me?’] just don’ t. .-to be there when it hap, Au! 1 SEE Jou: mae My: BACKGROUND: PAPER ON ‘the one most vulnerable | to ac- cusations ‘of guilt by associa: tion. To: the very last day, she supported ander Zalm, vigorously defending. him =? against all critics.” TF Mind. you, at. the time, she ee was the only one I: thought:had -: not only the right:but the diity a to defend him. Unlike most’ of her cabinet colleagues, who | chose to ignore their leader's blatant conflicts of interest ‘and; outright irresponsible: ” behaviour for political expe-. . diency, Johnston acted out of a sense of personal loyalty. She and Vander Zalm had been good personal friends for. more than 20 years, ©: She lost a lot of Fespect and credibility in the eyes ‘of many, when. she finally cut Vander ~ Zalm loose, going much fur-. - ‘ther i in her. ‘condemnation: of. the man than simply apologiz- ECONOMIC DIVERSIFICAT 104) > gO. ” ‘And hiad the. party. replaced Vander:Zalm at'that-time, it oe Would have greatly improved’. ” : chances for Metory, An. the next. a ani DI fy You Tw oF 11 ?, | om the. Capital by. Hubert Beyer caucus decision. Mel Couvelier, too, will find _it difficult to-disdssosiate:5' himself: from the past. Hew was’ finance minister in Vander — Zalm's government. He came - up with the idea of the Budget Stabilization Fund, discredited by-most financial experts. And he chose to ignore Vander’ = © Zalm's follies, even when © ' _others-in the party spoke up. "Duane Crandall, an early Vander Zaim:supporter, can - point to his relatively early rebellion against the former premier, He.and two others quit caucus two years ago in an attempt to. force a leader- ship review. Their gesture., achieved. absolutely nothing. © returned to. the. fold.::: Of the five candidates, | ae : Norm Jacobsen i is least tainted «. by the past.: ‘The former logg- ‘ing contractor has- always been ‘one of the miost unassuming: and modest politicians. He was neither. a preat supporter nor *.. an outspoken opponent of “Vander Zalm and-has'no - apologies to make.’ now The fifth candidate i is Grace | “=. McCarthy. Like Crandall, Mc- © : Carthy found herself at: odds: with Vander Zalm's leadership’ 4 style and when ‘she decided she. could: ‘no longer play | a part in | ‘his government, she quit her _sabinet post, | me Bui although she severed her ‘ties with the former leader, she refused to,take part.in-any .. », palace revolt, If McCarthy had followed the dissidents into ing. for his. actions and her ‘part in them. 9.00. “Johnston also hasn’ t exactly - . provided i inspiring leadership. — “since ‘she was made premier by - Sg yote ‘of caucus, and she. will "5 gonna’ miss the ultimate . ‘caucus exile, she might have _ triggered a gene/al revolt in the =. Social Credit ranks: two. years. the hope for socred future election, but instead, McCar- thy sat idle’ at the time, allow- jng Vander Zalm’ ‘td. ‘conitititie * doing ‘as ‘he pledséd’ ‘until a . Conflict-of-Enterest Commis- sioner Ted Hughes fi finally brought him down. : ’ « Based on the foregoing _ _ observations, Jacobsen would be the best choice for Social Credit, leader. He is: least associated with the former: . premier, and he’s a decent «- chap with undoubtedly good intentions, but that alone doesn’t win elections. - Even after having had their. . fill of charisma and smiles, the’ voters would still not elect a ~ man-who is totally lacking in - those: attributes. “Jacobsen is Nobody followed them into’ eX, ; - ile and all three eventually drink: ‘anid it is ‘doubtful that he could’ make British ‘Colum- bians forget all: about’ ‘Vander zalm whien they go 10: the ‘polls, - The. only: one: ‘whe has any hope’ ‘of. bringing’ off. that miracle: is McCarthy: Her political style has the | Necessary: ingredients of nostalgia and vi-: - Sion to make the next election: ~ at least a-race rathér than.a ‘political suicide ritual. for the Socteds. : All the polls shaw that Mc- : Carthy i isthe only’ one of the |. five candidates: who could. possible. beat: Mike Haréourt and ‘the. ‘NDP. Well, there i is". one: poll. which, ® iccording. to: Johnston’s supporters, has the. . premier neck to neck with . Harcourt::Too bad, they’ won't, let anyone see it, _ Leadership; conventions can - - develop a dynamics-all their \ own; arid-it, would be’: - Premature. to declare anyone a: Sure Winner, but.unless the s. WoKe., i GREAT FOR FISH WeAtRees AND rurey fare R's s! oo