See Dy a Ombudsman calls — for changes in pesticide approach The B.C. Office of the Ombudsman released its Report #11 last month, an examination of pesticide regulation in province that was prompted by a large volume of comlaints. * "the Primary thrust of the report concerns the permit-granting sysem in B.C., not the pesticides themselves because registration of the chemicals i is a federal jurisdiction. - The existing system of public involvement in the application of pesticides on crown lands in B.C. centers around the Environmental Appeal Board. Permits to usé pesticides on public lands are issued at the discretion of the Pesticide Control Branch of the Ministry of Environment; the terms of permits granted are then posted and advertised in the areas where the chemicals are to be used. Anyone objecting to the terms of the permit can lodge an appeal within 30 days by notifying the Environmental Appeal Board, who will then decide if the appeal is.valid. If it is, the EAB can invite written sub- missions or schedule a public hearing. After the appeal is heard and a decision handed down, there is no further avenue of appeal, unless - as the Nisga’a Tribal Council threatened recently during an EAB hearing in Terrace - the ap- pellant takes it into the court system. _ In his introduction to the report, Ombudsman Stephen Owen says of complainants who have contacted his office: ‘“Their frustra- tion and concern has led to court challenges, adverse publicity, civil disobedience and widespread mistrust of government pesticide use decisions, These interfere with natural’ resource planning and management by government and industry. No one is well served by the current situation,’’ Owen noted that B.C, is the only province in which anyone can appeal a pesticide use permit, and .he also stressed that EAB members labor under an excessive workload, often being deprived of sufficient time to effectively evaluate each appeal. The report’s recommendations were as follows: @ Develop and publish written criteria to clarify the definition of ‘“unreasonable adverse effect”’ with the object of giving the EAB a consistent guideline for decisions. @ Public notification of the intent to use pesticides 30 days prior to issuance of the proposed permit, with a requirement that any public responses be included with the permit application. The present system provides for the permit to be issued, after which the only public involvement is the appeal process. @ A requirement for full review and evaluation of all relevant data by Pesticide Control Committee members before permit decisions are made. Data would include the need for pesticide use, alter- natives to pesticides, and the history of -persistent- pesticide use in the area in question. @ An amendment to the Pesticide Control Act that would require multi-year permits to be posted at the beginning of each use season; posting of all permits should include information on the conditions to which they are subject and information stating the right to ap- peal, the time period for appeal, and the method and place for lodg- ing an appeal. @ The implementation of a formal disclosure policy by which ap- pellants have access to the same materials as those upon which the decision to grant the permit are based. @ The Environmental Appeal Board should provide a member for prehearing mediation between permitees and appellants to provide _an alternative to a full board hearing. The service should be provid- ed under the condition that the member would not sit on the board at a subsequent hearing. @ That strict criteria be developed for written submissions in ap- peals. @ That oral hearing be established as a general rule for determining appeals. e@ The EAB should disclose any material it has obtained in- dependently to both parties in the appeal, and the board should have the authority to acknowledge information which is publicly known, even if that information is not presented as evidence in the hearing. @ Future appointments to the EAB should take into account the specialized work of the agency and the related qualifications re- quired of board members. More than 75 percent of the pesticides used annually in B.C. are applied to privately-held land, mainly for agricultural purposes, and are not subject to appeal. Of the remaining pesticides, those used on public land, 66 percent are used in forestry, 11 percent are used for weed destruction on railway rights-of-way, and the re- mainder are used on utility rights-of-way, landscape, industrial and agricultural applications, and urban rodent control. There are currently 2,563 active pesticide use permits for crown land in B.C. In 1986 there were 60 appeals lodged against permits, of which four were upheld. Terrace Review — Wednesday, April6, 1988 17 CFTK broadcaster Journalist Siaine Gaffney was one of the “witnesses” at a recent trial held by Grade 9 English students at Thornhill Junior Secon- dary School to evaluate the effects fo television on people’s lives. Guring Gaftney's testimony “judge” Carma Clarke takes notes. Massage therapy still covered by B.C. Medical plan There was some good news in the recent provincial budget for one group concerned with health care costs. The Massage Therapists Association of B.C. was pleased that their services will remain in the Medical Ser- vices Plan, | . Patty Munson, a local Registered Massage Therapist, was concerned that the govern- ment, in looking for ways to save money in the health care portion of the budget, would _ drop massage therapy. ‘“‘It would put us in limbo. Most of my practice has been through doctor referrals’? which could . stop..if the. MSP. coverage was. ‘cut, Ms. Munson, who practiced in Thornhill until recently, join- ° ed with the Massage Therapists Association in expressing con- cern about this possiblity. Presi- dent of the Association Peter Behr said the alarm bells rang when health minister Peter Dueck made a public statement in September referring to the possibility of removing naturopathy and massage therapy from health plan coverage. The Association quickly prepared a brief and presented it to Dueck, stressing that massage therapy was not costly. Massage therapy used Jess than one-tenth of one per cent, or $3,200,000 of the total health care budget in 1986/87. The $5 user fee charg- ed since July 1987 will further reduce this amount, The average cost to MSP per patient was $55.88, compared to average pa- tient costs of $79.84 for private practice physiotherapists, $77.97 for chiropractic patients, and $160 for office visits to or- thopedic surgeons, the brief stated. Behr said he met with the health minister and with caucus and MLAs several times since then, urging the government to study the cost effectiveness of Recognition day for injured workers massage therapy. He gave the example of a person experienc- ing severe low back pain.‘‘H the patient was given a week or so of bed rest therapy in hospital, the cost would be $3,000 to $5,000. However, if we can ease the pain enough to keep the person out of hospital, with five or six massages, the cost is about $50.”’ ‘“‘The government seemed to see our point. We won, basical- ly. And with the increased premium assistance, there will be more people who won't be re- quired to pay the $5 user fee for massage therapy,” he said. Munson was relieved when she .. heard the good news. ‘‘]’m very happy about it,’’ she said, Thornhill students put TV on trial Students in Grade 9 English at Thornhill Junior Secondary School had the opportunity to practice their rhetorical skills Friday in a session of moot court. On trial? Television After a unit of study about television that included an essay, filmstrips and personal research, the class put TV on trial to face two charges: that TV, both through programming and through advertising ‘‘pushes”’ drugs; that TV steals thousands of hours from the lives of all of us, hours that in most instances - could be far more © produtively spent. Teams of attorneys argued the cases before a jury of other class members. Witnesses were called, questioned and cross-examined. The trial even included ‘‘expert’’ witnesses Blaine Gaffney of CFTK TV and Robert Brown of the Steelhead Society. Both at- tested to the dangers of in- discriminate television watching. Verdict? Television was ac- quitted of the charge of being a drug-pusher, but was convincted of Grand Theft Time. Most students agreed that it was a stimulating exercise. _Thanks from English 9C to guests and teachers who made the trials a success. The Terrace Duplicate Bridge Club meets every Wednesday at 7:15 p.m. ‘at Caledonia Senior Secondary in the cafeteria. Anyone in- terested In playing please contact Ellen Smith at 635-4096 or May McFarland at 635-2875. Everyone welcome. Atiocalion £ "24 4 HOUR CALL At 11 a.m. on April 28, the City of Terrace will recognize labor’s official ‘‘Day of | Recognition’? for workers kill- ‘ed, injured or disabled on the job with a one-minute stoppage - of work to allow employees time to reflect and consider the im- portance and need for a safe, healthy workplace. In a letter to council, CUPE Local 2012 president Candice Kerman said, ““CUPE Local 2012 would like to pay our respects to the thousands of fellow workers killed on the job in the last decade and the millions who have suffered in- juries resulting in permanent or partial disabilities.” , “Local 2012 is hopeful that Council will agree that one worker killed or injured on the job is one too many and that by recognizing this important day you will be demonstating to the entire community your concern for the health and safety of all workers in our community.’’ Directors — Alf If Defrane: and. Je STL NG HO te aay. ve ole gs ee ee ee ert te