i i SSSCRNS . SHOULD A_ baseball player who,,knows he has been tagged out on a play but has_been call- ed. safe. by the umpire, tell the ump he, is really out? Should he play the game to make it look as.though he were safe? » Should players of any. Same— boxing, football, basketball, hockey——try to beat the rules. the, determining factor being on- ly that they, don’t get caught? -- The. .whole interesting ques- tion: of -ethics in sports has been raised in a “debate’?.in the New York _ Daily ‘Worker. between Sports columnist , Lester Rodney and a leading Marxist ‘theoreti- cian and author. of..a .book. of ethics,- Dr.: Howard, Selsam. After Rodney's «first ‘column, | Dr... Selsam: writes: - ~“4rhe issue’ raised: here con- cetting basebail“is’ but one in- Stante ‘of what happens to ath- ieti¢s ‘when’ they aré commercial- itéd* ahd’ when: ‘winning out- Wéigis ‘all other considerations. What Is accepted American prac- tite‘in sports of all kinds? You knioW better ‘than ‘1 do that football. players are ‘taught to idjure their opponents seriously enéugh ‘to put’ them out of the game, and that many are delib- eratély hurt anu*some even kill- éd? in' this way? “You kngW, too, that this be- comes a'special hazard to the Negro player who is up against not only the usual’ ‘ethics’ of thé'game but white chauvinism to boot. Such training includes lessons in how to do it without being caught. Isn’t the boxer taught how to violate rules with- Out the referee seeing it? One could even argue that part of the skill of one team and hence itS superiority over another con- Sist§ precisely ‘in its ability to violate the Fules and cheat in One Way or another without be- ing- caught by ‘the umpire of referee. : “Tam sure you know players who are skilled not Only in run- ning’ bases but also in tech- niques of appearing to be safe even ‘when tagged out. Isn’t that, one could argue, part of being a good ballplayer—a bet- ter'player than one, for example, who ‘clumsily appears caught even When he is safe?” * * * DR. SELSAM, of course, is ‘not proposing to start a cam- ‘paign to “clean up baseball”: “It would: be silly and quixotic ‘to expect that our sports can be “pure’ when our society is shot ‘through with every kind of cor- ruption, We must fight to keep ‘even our great commercialized ‘sports as clean and decent as possible, — that the highest moral prin- ciples: aré maintaineq in all working’ class sports. We must alsé ‘struggle to create the kind of ‘society in which all athletics, all sports, will be forms of cre. ative human’ activity and not ss We must see to it - ould sport stars Who’s on third? Chico! Picture above shows Chicago White Sox’ Zreat Chico Carresquell sliding safely into third with Cleveland's Johnny Berardino trying to tag him. Had the umpire called “Out!” should Johnny have cor- rected him? Read the article on ethics in sports on this page and then write in your opinion to this (paper, commercializeg spectacles con- trolled by big money interests. Only under socialism can all Sports and their participants be soverned by ethical principles.” * * * IN REPLY, Lester Rodney, admitting the validity of many points made by Dr. Selsam, said he wanted to “tangle” with some of his arguments: “Baseball is a good gamé, right now, in spite of the society it functions in. It'll be even better in a world at peace and in an American where the blight of the money-bag moguls. and money-bag morality is being lifted from its back, “Tt know ang [ like most of the players. They are decent enough guys and their basic democracy has asserted itself strongly whenever given a ' chance, as in the ending of the Owners’ infamous jimcrow ban. I insist there can be no discus- sion whatsoever about baseball .Without somewhere distinguish- ing between the moguls and the suys who play ball for a living. “So I can’t see the phrase in which Dr. Selsam said, ‘Again. I think that both you and your friend missed the distinction be- tween the type of game govern- ed by mutually accepted moral standards and the ‘mass produc- tion’ games, such as American football, basketball and base- ball, which are basically profes- sional and in which the sole possible goal is to win, by no matter what means.’ “What is meant by basically professional?’ Anything in which people make their living is bas- ically professional, isn’t it? What’s wrong with that? ‘Am- ateur’ if for fun if you have the time and can afford it, ‘Pro- fessional’ provides the groceries, In the same way the theatre ang ballet are ‘basically professional,’ “As to winning ‘by no matter what means,’ this is exaggerg- tion of fact. Will] the Dodgers 80 out to beat the Giants tonight ‘by no matter what means?’ Will they try to waylay, say, Maglie or slug him in a dark alley? Actually it takes special rules to keep the players of both: teams from the*normal fratern- ization of men who work at the Same trade and have respect for each other and each others’ abilities. ‘I don’t want to win it that way,’ Andy Pafko of the Dodgers said sadly to me cthe other day speaking of the Giants’ : Monte Irvin’s accident.” * * * ALL OF THIS is only part of the pro and con argumentation. But it raises the point. We'd like to hear from our Sports-minded readers what they think on this question of ethics in sports—for it has interesting Overtones for the forthcoming Olympic Games, The U.S. Olym- pic team leaders have expressed one objective: ‘beat the Rus- sians,”’ Presumably this means by fair means or foul. Both Soviet and Finnish sports so- cieties have Suggested the Olym- Pics be turned into a “Festival of Peace.” = Runner starts q long slide into Second and umpire keeps his eyes on play, 6S phe SPORTLIGHT By BERT WHYTE TELEVISION MARCHES ON. When the CBC introduces TV in Canada next fall, hockey fans in Toronto will be able to sit in their living rooms and watch the Maple Leafs. in action at the Gardens. All NHL games played in the Queen City will ‘be televised under sponsorship of Imperial Oil, and the plan may be extended to include Montreal, Won’t TV hurt hockey ?: Canny Conny Smythe, president of the Maple Leaf Gardens, doesn’t think so. “They used to shout that radio woull kill us,” he says, “but the novelty soon wore off and radio interested thousands of people in hockey who'd never given the game much thought. It'll be the same way with télevision. People will be sold on the game and they won’t be Satisfied to stay at home but will turn out to the rinks.” Foster Hewitt, who gives play-by-play descriptions of Toronto games over a 39-station radio network, sees some problems which will have to be overcome. “The trouble will be to find cameramen who know the hockey, business as well as the TV business,” he says. “You need a man who can anticipate plays, the same way a hockey announcer must anticipate exciting moments.” For a while, at least, Vancouver fans will have’ to wait before they'll be able to see PCHI games on TV. Perhaps that’s just. as well, considering the brand of local hockey displayed by Coley Hall’s Canucks. Let’s build a decent team on the ice before bringing them into our living rooms, * * * __ THE GROWTH OF television in the United States has revo- lutionized the boxing industry. A new era opened when sponsors Gillette and Pabst began coast to coast transmission of fights late in 1951. During the year TV and radio sponsors paid $2,000,000 in rights fees, to $5,000,000 from paid admissions, Take a look at these sample figures: Attendance Gross Receipts TV-Radio Marciano-Louis 17,241 $152,845 $225,000 Charles-Maxim 7,226 77,319 100,000 Walcott-Charles 28,272 245.004 100,000 Maxim-Murphy 9,525 48,148 100,000 Gavilan-Graham 8,137 34,419 50,000 Robinson-LaMotta _ 14,803 186,866 50,000 in Helsinki. Meanwhile, ‘the British Columbia branch of the Amateur Athletic Union and the Police Mutual Benevolent Asso- BARGAIN BASEMENT: Want to earn a fast buch) All right, just answer this Sports question: Who knocked out John L. Sullivan to win the heavyweight title Answers must be mailed to Rert Whyte, Pacific Tribune, Room 6, 426 Main Street, Vancouver, B.C. The person who mails in the correct answer first will receive a dollar bill by return post. Watch for another Bargain Basement question next week. PACIFIC TRIBUNE —_ MAY 16, 1952 _ PAGE 10