Review oe EDITORIAL PAGE * The peaks rise from beautiful Garibaldi Lake. Power and profits Nor how B.C.’s economy and wellbeing may be: advanced by the development of our rich hydro- electric power resources, but how _ ‘much profit can be extracted from the consumer when the Peace River Development project of Wen- ner-Gren, B.C. Electric and com- pany gets under way. How much the construction cost, and how much the profit? That is the underlying theme of the present controversy among electric power tycoons and their Socred lackeys. Over the weekend the B.C. La- bor-Progressive Party convention put the power issue in a nutshell. “Private control over power re- sources will be utilized primarily for the extraction of profits for the Wenner - Gren Corporation, rather than for the maximum dev- elopment of the industrial economy of B.C.” Under public ownership “‘con- sumer prices for power would be lower and tax burdens eased. Cheap- er power depends upon public ownership, and can not be realized under private ownership.” Comes the next provincial elec- Pacific Tribune Phone MUtual 5-5288 Editor — TOM McEWEN Managing Editor — BERT WHYTE Published weekly at Room 6 — 426 Main Street ‘ ‘Vancouver 4, B.C. Subscription Rates: One Year: $4.00 Six Months: $2.25 Canadian and Commonwealth countries (exeept Australia): $4.00 one year. Australia, United States and all other countries: $5.00 one year, s tion, the Achilles heel of Socred giveaway policies is its shameful abandonment of the hydro resources of B.C. to the power buccaneers, vative and foreign. The Briggs ex- pese opened the door to let the people have a peek. The people themselves must take it off the hinges, clean house of Socred sell- out artists, and elect a government which will make public ownership of power and other resources avail- able to its rightful owners — the people. Neutrality — wae ae at Lansing, Michigan last Sunday before an audience of some 78,000, Prime Minister John Diefenbaker, starring in the role of Charley McCarthy to the Washington atomaniacs, declared: “There is no neutralism in Canada’s thinking or conduct .~ . no weaken- ing of support for NATO.” a3 Diefenbaker may speak for the Blimps and Bumbles in his Tory ‘ government; he may even speak for the whole of his Tory party, al- though that is questionable, but he does not speak for Canada or the Canadian people! Perhaps the prime minister may have forgot that he was elected primarily, because of his demagogic promises to change the policies of the Liberal St. Laurent government; policies which committed Canada’s sovereignty, independence, economy and peace to the dictates of U.S. imperialism and “brinkmanship” conspiracies—but the people have not forgotten. As the suicidal fiasco of Can- adian-U.S. policies unfold with each passing day, the demand for a policy of neutrality and complete disengage- ment. from the war provocations “integrated . defense” - Comment and Die [ and conspiracies of U.S. im ism. finds an urgent and widening response among the adian people. Since the Diefenbaker se! of the Avro-Arrow “defense ject (with its $400 millions 40 the drain) and the subservi ‘ ceptance of U.S. Bomarc } as our key weapon of de wider circles of people are coming seriously disturbed and ut easy. While Prime Minister Dieten baker was declaring for “no neutt ity” and relegating Canada Canadians to an atomic ashpile - please his U.S. “defenders” the BG district convention of the Labor Progressive Party was reitetat the one and only course for : vival; “the realization of new tional policies based on peac ccexistence, and a complete 0 with U.S. imperialism .. + The choice, and the time to it is NOW, either a neuti which means an_ intensified for peace and mutual survi or, Diefenbaker’s “no neutrali and U.S..triggered nuclear mi launchine sites on Canadian ritory, which do not “defend.” invite devastating destruction! — Tom. McEwen JIQ@OLD,” as the old veteran G prospector of the rainbow trail used to say, “is where you find it.’ For the early gold-rush pioneers of the Klondyke-Cari- boo era (and far beyond), that was the propelling incentive — to dig. Inthe wake of these pioneer diggers came the card sharps, the shell-game artists, the gals, all well outfitted, not to dig but to “mine the miners.” In these days, however, the modern ‘prospector,’ endowed with a predatory instinct of where to find gold, generally heads for the most direct and likely source — the pockets of the gillible, unwitting, or de- fenseless people. The modern monopolist of our day has made a science of gold- digging. Together with his cor- porate “partners” he corners the source and production of essen- tial commodities, rigs the price structure, and elects a Liberal, Tory or Socred government to give his gold-digging “legal” status. A setup which the old- time prospector would call a ‘dead-pipe cinch.” , : Then there’s the other type of prospector, the wildcat fly- by-night lad, who knows exactly where there’s oodles of gold to be found, if enough people will just “grubstake” him in suffi- cent volume to bring it out. Take the case of Vancouver “prospector” Jameg Harris Mc- Kee and his Fraser River “black sands” Eldorado. going to wash out fabulous quan- tities of gold from these sands, ship it out in “milk cans,” melt -it into gold bricks, and make all those “investors” who had given him their “confidence” and some $850,000 as rich as fabled King Midas to carry on their anti- Communist crusade. - When the Fraser River gold scheme petered out, with nary a “milk can” in sight, McKee took off for parts unknown. Later he turned up in Bellingham, ‘Wash- ’ jngton with another crusade for gold, this time a little placer mining in Sunny California. Of course this new scheme would require additional “grubstake” ‘ganizations and individuals such — McKee was investments, so prospector Mc Kee kept the phone hot urging old and new investors to get in on this California bonanza, which among other blessings, would “recoup” all previous Fraser River investments. “Thar’s gold in them thar hills.” = Unlike the old-time prospec- tor, however, McKee’s “grub- stake” backers are in a class by themselves. They consist of or- as the “Freedom Foundation” of Toronto headed up by the notori- ous anti - Semite Ron Gostick — and a few ministers, one whom explained in an article in the Toronto Telegram of April 6 that “We Sought Gold For God's Work.” ae In addition to these there ap- pears tb be a lot of Baptists and other misguided humans w regard ‘‘God”s Work” as the rabid promotion of anti-commu- nism, anti - fluoridation, anti- Semitism,, anti - mental health, who desperately seek gold to promote such racist and anti- social trash as the Protocols of Zion and Ron Gostick’s Cana” dian Intelligence Service liter- ary filth. : What skulduggery is commit- ted in the name of “Christianity.” ‘June 12, 1959 — PACIFIC TRIBUNE—P