Garment workers settle strike TORONTO — What was ex- pected to be ‘‘a long and bitter strike’* was settled just five days after the. 1,100 members of the In- ternational Ladies Garment Workers Union shut down the ci- ty’s fashion industry, Sept. 15. After 49 strike-free years the employers were forced to “und stand how strong and mili- tant the workers really are,” explained Alexandra Dagg, edu- cation director for the Ontario di- vision of the union. The strike hit the 18 companies in the Toronto Dress and Sports- wear Guild just as it was finishing up its fall season. ‘‘In such a labor-intensive industry you can usually get good results from a strike,’ Dagg said adding that the Guild was probably taken aback by the solid stand of the strikers. ‘“‘We were almost 100 per cent strong; only a half dozen scabs in 18 factories,’ said Dagg. The union was able to save its jointly funded pension plan, which the Guild wanted to scrap. It also won improvements in health and sickness benefits. Wages, the last item of agree- ment, will be raised 4 and 4 per cent in the first two years of a three-year contract. The third year provides a 35 cent across- the-board increase. Workers at the bottom end of the wage scale will receive 30 cents plus in each year of the agreement. The workers accepted the agreement, Sept. 19 by a 99.9 per cent vote in favor. Charity begins at home Gainers owner Peter Porklington just can’t seem to get away ro the message that ‘Gainers wieners are made with scabs” W has daunted him since the strike began at his Edmonton n packing plant. Last weekend, he was all set to do a favor for hi friend Mila Mulroney, honorary chair of the Cystic Fibros Foundation, by lending her his Edmonton Oilers hockey team for charity performance at the Ottawa Civic Centre. Outside ‘ stadium 50 trade unionists answered the call of the Ottawa District Labor Council to remind spectators that although th cause was a good one, Pocklington should show the same ki compassion for his employees and settle the strike which is entering its fourth month. : a4 TRIBUNE PHOTOS Horror stories behind Pocklington’s lines Why three people ended up with food poisoning after eating Gainers ham becomes obvious from this view inside the Edmonton plant. George Duschamps, was recruited by a scab by Gainers owner Peter Pocklington. He worked on the line for about a month, before quitting and joining the 1,100 workers on strike outside. He was interviewed by striker Gerry Beauchamp on Sept. 14. A short excerpt from the interview appears below. How is the plant, the general conditions? Rough, very rough. How’s the floors? Dirty. Can you tell us anymore about the pork cutting? Last month I tagged one bin, marked it myself ... we'd done our-shift, when the shift was over, I put a felt marker like an “X on one of the tags, and that meat was green color. And yet W were still told to put it on the line. So in other words you packed it, it went to the consumer? Yes, and yet half of them are going with hair on the skin. At good 40 per cent is going with hair. The supervisors themselves are picking it off the floor, throwing it back on the line. And the meat inspectors themselves, which I saw with my own eyes, pick _ the meat up, put it back on the line. Okay, they put it back on the line. Do they clean it? No. They put it right on the line. te ae There has been no report from the Department of Agriculture | on the investigation it launched September 17 following the food poisoning cases and the discovery of three cases of tainted ham in New Brunswick and Nova Scotia. The ham marketed under the brand-name Eversweet, was recalled by the company. Ottawa has given no response to union demands that the plant be closed until the strike between Gainers and the union, the United Food and Commercial Workers, has been settled. BS ES Oo” SF OF FE LOE” ‘Influx of off-shore producers to Canada ; In recent months investment in the ~ Canadian auto industry by Korean and vincial, have accompanied all such investments. After GM-Suzuki was OP 2 BATT ee ae Ae I — Ee CPE SF Of SP Lt fb a Oe LS x Japanese firms has been in the news, with large amounts of Canadian govern- ment funds being readily made available to these corporations to locate here. The reasons for such investment are two-fold: an experienced and productive workforce and cheaper Canadian dollar. With today’s Japanese yen up 56 per cent relative to the U.S. dollar, it’s cheaper now to produce a car in Canada, which explains why Honda announced last year it will double its planned output in Allis- ton, Ontario, to 80,000 cars a year by 1988. This off-shore investment has had an effect on North American auto produc- ers because, not only are they now facing Japanese auto plants locating here, but also now face Japanese auto parts pro- ducers with eight such companies having Signed assistance or joint-venture agreements with Canadian firms. These include three with Magna Inter- national and another five or six joint-ven- ture or investment announcements expected shortly. There is also an additional new threat from Japanese parts producers, 79 of whom are presently located in the U.S. with another 300 making plans to enter the U.S. mainland. Canada’s parts indus- try, which has fought long: and hard to catch up with the U.S. parts industry, now faces this new competition. Why should Canadian autoworkers take note of these new investments? The fact is that when Japanese and Korean plants begin operations in On- ~ tario and Quebec, they will be introduc- ing the latest and most sophisticated technology. That means maximum pro- duction with a minimum workforce. This is of concern to all workers, espe- cially Canadian Auto Workers (CAW) members at GM Ste. Therese, Quebec, which has yet to be assigned a new model for its 4,000-employee assembly plant. Among the most militant in the auto- workers’ union, these employees are working with 1960s technology and have been told by General Motors to become more productive or face plant closure. The plant is one of three GM operates producing big cars, two being in the U.S. and one of them scheduled for closure in 1987. Backgrounder John Maclennan GM is trying with limited success to get all three plants into a bidding race to see who will surrender the most. In addi- tion, GM has states, provinces and local municipalities fighting to keep their plants open, a tactic employed by each of the giant auto transnationals. Here the corporations find the Tories in Ottawa very agreeable, as seen when Federal Industry Minister Michel Cote told the media, Aug. 28: ‘‘Ottawa will provide whatever incentives it takes to persuade General Motors to keep open its threatened car plant at Ste. Therese Public monies, both federal and pro- granted $85-million in taxpayers’ money, its president, Osamu Suzuki said: “It was our premise that in order to come tO Canada, government’ assistance was necessary.’ Ontario’s premier Peterson called such international competition for investment “‘ruthless.”’ An example of this was seen when — Hyundai located in Bromont, Quebec. Company officials expressed surprise when practically forced to accept $110- million in unsolicited federal grants over three years. So anxious were the feds that, unlike the GM-Suzuki agreement which will come under the auto pact within two years of operation, Hyundai faces no requirements or commitments to Canadian content. Next week: The union’s response, and an- alternative from the Communists and the Left. me JAPANESE CAR PLANTS IN ONTARIO : Annual auto | Start-up Company Location Plant cost Jobs production year SUZUKI-GM INGERSOLL, ONT. - $500 MILLION 2,000 200,000 | 1989 TOYOTA CAMBRIDGE, ONT. $300 MILLION ae 50,000 | 1988 ; HONDA ALLISTON, ONT. $100 MILLION 300 40,000 | 198 a pos 6 e PACIFIC TRIBUNE, OCTOBER 1, 1986