Ld mm At bl | CUPE wams of privatization ; threat to Canadian hospitals When you tie in the fact that corporations have practically unlimited financial, advertising and UNI “‘We’re a force to be re- ckoned with — no longer will we stand with heads hung and humbly accept the dole ...”’ By MIKE PHILLIPS : 1983 dawned with an ominous development in , ur health care system, that threatens its destruc- tion, unless people can get together to stop the trend. January 1, 1983 was the day a U.S.-based multi-national corporation, American Medical International (AMI), of Beverly Hills, California, took over the management of the Hawkesbury Dis- ''tict General Hospital. _What happened in this relatively small commu- nity on the Ontario-Quebec border, about 80 km, 2 (50 miles) south-east of Ottawa, could soon be " Tepeated in too many similar communities caught inthe wringer of increased government cutbacks to fund hospital budgets. In 1981, the only two hospitals in the town of #000 merged. The Board of Directors wanted to build a new 116-bed facility; the Ontario Govern- ment agreed to provide two thirds of the funding, if million could be raised locally. ; AMI got its foot in the door when it agreed to Perce $6-million in loan guarantees as part of a : fe to manage the hospital at $300,000 a year for ne next 12 years. :. AMI got its foot in the door when it agreed to _ Provide $6-million in loan guarantees as part ofa : tract with the board or directors lets the U.S. ' Nulti-national keep whatever it can shave off the | Operating budget above the promised $750,000. ae Canadian Union of Public Employees \ : UPE), representing the workers who will be the ’ Victims of this ‘‘efficiency’’ drive by AMI is against ‘ immorality of allowing private profits to be _ Squeezed out of the provision of essential services. CUPE also warns that all the evidence gathered eo far, on the impact of privatization on public | Sector services, including health care, demon- ’ Strates that jobs are lost, services decline, and in Some cases, graft and corruption begin to run _ Tampant. The union, in a recent study on the growing _ threat of privatization to the health care sector, ' Points to Britain, where a model, universally | *cessible care and delivery system has been ’ transfigured through privatization into a two-tiered ’ System favoring the rich and abandoning the poor. AMI has said that at least 10% of the work force at the Hawkesbury hospital will be gone through i eouon by 1985 and that 80% of the annual 1 shea “savings” will be effected through staff _ _ Ontop of that, the company intends to boost its _ Profits by selling such services as diet counselling _ and fitness programs to the community. ° ‘There isa Strong Possibility that we will see an explosion of _ Hawkesburys in the very near future unless we Tete to prevent it now’’, the CUPE brief Font _ _ AMI claims to be in the process of negotiating Contracts with 10 other Canadian hospitals — in : Seno, Alberta and B.C. The ‘‘open for busi- ve Mentality of the Tory governments that rule pee but two provinces sets the stage for further _ attacks by private business on public health care And its delivery. lobbying resources, with the government’s drive for cutbacks in social sector spending, the small and medium-sized institutions are sitting ducks for privatization, unless the public refuse to be shafted this way and press their governments to act in stopping the drift toward it. AMI, one of the three largest private health care corporations owns or manages more than 120 dif- ferent hospitals in 12 with U.S. countries. It employs some 31 ,000 people and realized a profit of $79-million last year, a big jump from $33-million it made in 1980. Extendicare Inc., another private health care corporation owns or manages some 40 nursing homes in Canada, including 15 in Ontario and 38 others in the U.S. It also wants to get into the hospital management business and its officers are presently holding discussions with various provin- cial governments. They see themselves carving out a profitable empire in Chronic care hospitals. Extendicare al- ready manages two of them in Saskatoon and hopes to clinch a deal, soon, where it will help build and manage a separate chronic care facility on the grounds of an Ontario hospital. Like AMI, Exten- dicare is on the move, with negotiations for similar deals at six other Canadian hospitals. CUPE stresses the need for hospital workers to lose no time in mobilizing against privatization of their hospitals at the first sign such developments are brewing. Also the union urges its members and people in the community to get elected to their hospitals’ board of directors to be better able to influence the direction public medicine will take in their communities, and stop the disintegration of the health care system. ‘‘Profitability,”” the union argues, can only be won in the health care field by reducing staff and the quality of service. The first result of the a private takeover is less staff and more unemploy- ment. ‘‘Private ownership or management will always have profit as its priority, not patient care’’, the CUPE study says. “Indeed, in the Hawkesbury story the whole emphasis has been the supposed ‘cost savings’ of privatization — not a word about improving or even maintaining the level of patient care.” “Every health care worker in this country should be concerned about privatization’’, and the union might have added, so should the rest of us. Union demands jobs kept at SGI jobless, Niagara Penninsula . Here’s what he had to say ina trade unionist holding office in my small local plant. I helped my fellow workers resolve grievances and other problems they may have had, to the best - unemployment.” W REGINA — The Saskatche- an Insurance, Office and fessional Employees Union PEIU) filed a grievance March With management of Sas- tchewan Government Insur- one (SGI), over the recent. lay- S of 120 SGI workers. OPEIU representative Dave aki charged the SGI action i$ a Clear violation of the union’s to two private insurance com-' SGI's board of directors, and the the establishing of help centres and organizing the jobless around Collective agreement with the panies in each area the gove™m: curt of one of the private firms | economic and political issues stemming from the economic crisis. _ 8©vernment-operated insurance ment-run bureaus are being in Weyburn that stands to gain the a _ ©0rporation. closed. These are in Weyburn, licensing rights. Mike Phillips Maki charged the layoffs result from the government contracting out licensing responsibilities that would normally be performed by OPEIU members in SGI Motor Vehicle Division offices. The con- tract clearly states that contract- ing out can only occur as long as workers covered in the collective ment won’t be displaced. SGI has turned over licensing Estevan, Swift Current and North Battleford. Maki has written to the cor- - poration demanding the layoffs be rescinded, and has indicated the union is considering trying to sec- ure an injunction to stop the lay- offs. The union has also raised the charge of conflict of interest involving Ron Jeffery, who is on _ offering a free jobs listing service, which is aimed at driving Job ee eee This mood, summed up by a worker is taking hold among many unemployed Canadians as they begin to reap the re- wards of organizing them- selves and fighting back. recent letter to the Trib: ‘*A year ago I was an active of my ability. It was a rewarding position, and I felt good about the gains we made at contract time, and the slowly improving working conditions. Things change ina year, however, and my fellow workers and I were all laid off permanently when the parent company decided our plant was a “‘liability’’. We were all helpless to prevent it, and there was not a thing I could do to help my co-workers — or myself. In my search for new employment I soon discovered how many others shared my plight, and when I read in the Tribune about the successes of others in organizing the unemployed I decided to get involved. ; Well, I haven't looked back. After getting involved with two separate groups, I have found the work to be very rewarding, and we have succeeded in getting a voice that can be heard by many. At least one Job Mart office has closed as a result of the un- employed and pointing out to them the inequities of the system and how to help change it. We need much more support, and we are getting it too, slowly. but surely. The unemployed workers are a force to be reckoned with. No longer will we stand with heads hung and humbly accept the dole. Rather let us raise our voices in unison to demand solutions to the underlying problems that are causing our . * * * 4 With the backing of the local Catholic diocese and the Alberta Federation of Labor, the Edmonton Committee of the Unemployed is gearing up for acampaign to highlight the plight and anger of the 136,000 unemployed in the province. ' Protesting the provincial Tory government's refusal to seri- ously recognize the problem in the latest throne speech, the ECU, our Edmonton correspondent Chris Frazer reports, issued layoff slips of its own to some 120 federal, provincial and civic politicians including Prime Minister Trudeau, Premier Lougheed, and Edmonton Mayor Cec Purves. “We can’t afford to maintain these ‘employees’, especially when we see such little return for our ‘investment’, so, we're laying them off for incompetence, the inability to accept respon- sibility, and lack of productivity’’, Keith Rimstead, an ECU spokesperson said. : Further actions are planned including a picket at City Hall against utility shut offs,and a campaign to expose the deplorable conditions and shortages at singles’ hostels. Single unemployed are dropped from the welfare rolls after two months, Frazer reports. * * * Unemployment lines: Vancouver City Council has demanded that Job Mart ‘‘show cause”’ why its business license should not be suspended or revoked, after a meeting, March 15, where council unanimously agreed to press the B.C. Socred labor minis- try to initiate prosecution proceedings against Job Mart owner Trevor Madden. A community service committee report to council said Job Mart is ‘operating a deceptive business in violation of the Employment Standards Act’’ under a section which prohibits charging fees for jobs or information about job vacancies . .. April 5 will be the official opening of St. Catharine’s Unemployment Help Centre which, in. addition to providing the area’s jobless wtih a place to go, will offer jobs listings and counselling services, and a soup kitchen. The centre will be located at 145 King Street . .. Hamilton’s Wage Restraint and Unemployed Co-Ordinating Committee is now “Mart out of business in the Steel town. ““We’re going to provide more than Job Mart does without the $50 fee’’, help. centre spokesperson Kerry Wilson said . .. The United ‘Auto Workers at its latest Canadian district council meeting has pledged itself to a ‘‘maximum effort’’ in a campaign to reach out to, and help organize unemployed workers. UAW locals have been directed by the council to take part in the campaign aimed at stepping up NE PACIFIC TRIBUNE—APRIL 1, 1983—Page 7 See