Seertiactions -eltra left — cloud issues in IBEW 213° The daily press recently carried a report that the trial for damages against Frank Stevens, © business manager of Cement Masons Inter- national Union Local 919, will not proceed. According to that news story, Stevens delivered a satisfac- tory apology to union officials Jim Kinnaird, Roy Gautier and Mike Parr who had instituted the action for damages. The action .arose out LABOR COMMENT BY JACK PHILLIPS of statements carried in a Vancouver Sun article, July 7, 1978, ins which Stevens charged that the three leaders of the B.C. and Yukon Building Trades Council had at- tempted to favor certain unions in contract negotiations with the employers’ organization. Personally, I believe it is much better when such questions are settl- ed within the labor movement itself, and not by a court of law. I also believe that Kinnaird, Gautier and Parr were unfairly criticized by Stevens, and that the published statements by Stevens were grossly unfair and should never have been given to a reporter for the Vancouver Sun. But the differences within the ranks of the seventeen construction unions which led to the statements by Stevens still remain, and could return to haunt the next round of negotiations. ~ _ However, there are circumstances under which court action is justified. Let me give one example: If a person, union member or non- member, made a statement to the press that a labor official, identified by name, had stolen, say $10,000 from union funds, that labor of- ficial would have good reason to in- stitute legal action to clear his name. However, if union officials took legal action every time they were accused of spending union JIM GEE-.. .. former president defeated, with help of ultra left. funds unwisely, or of not strictly conforming to the rules laid down pertaining to record keeping, the courts would find their work load greatly increased. Such matters are better left to the internal procedures and checks of the trade union movement itself. Basically, the standard of accountability in the handling of funds in the Canadian trade union movement is no less than what prevails in the communi- ty as a whole, and much better in many cases. Now that Kinnaird, who became president of the B.C. Federation of Labor last November, is satisfied with the apology from Stevens, he may be able to help his own union, Local 213 of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, to settle a messy, internal situation without going to the court. As an aftermath of the hard- fought election campaign in that local of some 3,800 members, nine members have .been charged inter- ‘ nally under the union trial pro- cedure and eight members have had an action instituted against them in Supreme Court. The outcome of the election gave Cliff Rundgren his third, three-year term as business manager when he defeated Jim Gee in a run-off elec- tion. Gee had served a three-year term as president prior to the elec- tion. Rundgren received approx- imately 55 percent of the vote and strengthened his support in the ex- ecutive board. It is reported that the business manager of this local receives about $30,000 a year in wages and approx- imately $5,000 in fringe benefits. As business manager, he has the sole authority to hire and fire the nine assistant business managers who work under his direction. Each of them also receive about $30,000 a year in wages and benefits, I am told. The constitution of the IBEW gives the business manager more authority than any other member of CLIFF RUNOGREN... re- elected to business agents post. the executive board and a very strong power position in relation to | the executive board as a whole. This, of course, accentuates the struggle over policy which frequent- ly takes place. This struggle comes into sharper focus during an elec- tion campaign, particularly if there are groups who strongly disagree with the policies, style of work and performance of the _ business manager and his assistants. It must also be said, because union members are people and not angels, that such conflicts may be ag- gravated by selfish motives and deep-going, personal animosities. - Left-wing and _ progressive members in a situation like that try to lift the debate to-the level of ex- amining policies in relation to the real needs of the membership and the labor movement as a whole. Sometimes this is not an easy thing to do, particularly when they themselves are the target of a dirty campaign, or when_ ultra-left elements engage in a far-out, mud slinging campaign against the ad- ministration.-Such actions by the ultra left leave many honest members with the mistaken idea that the responsible left and their progressive friends are somehow associated with the ultras. Although Jim Gee refused to comment on the election, other members told me that the campaign literature put out by a third group within the local hurt the campaign of Gee and his supporters and gave the edge to the Rundgren forces. In the main, the hotly contested posi- tions were won by a slim majority. It is this third group which is reported to be the target of internal disciplinary actions and civil actions in the court. This group it is said, is responsi- ble for a circular put out over the name of the ‘‘United Committee for Democracy in the Local.’’ The circular is short, in constructive policy and long in mud slinging, with charges of misappropriation of funds, a “‘special relationship’’ bet- ween a union officer and a temale office employee resulting in finan- PACIFIC TRIBUNE— SEPTEMBER 14, 1979-- Page 12 cial gain to the latter, and general mismanagement. Gee and some of his supporters also had garbage thrown at them in this pamphlet, but they are not lay- ing any charges, I am told. Judging by the amount of space given to the defense of Terry Simp- son and his ultra-left friends in the union, it is reasonable to assume the sponsors of the circular are, to say the least, sympathetic to the Simp- son crowd. In May 1975, Simpson and eight other members were charged and later convicted by a union trial com- mittee. Sentences suspension of membership privileges for periods ranging from two to fifteen years, with Simpson drawing a fifteen-year suspension. However, he was successful in his appeal to the 1978 international convention of the IBEW and was reinstated. In January, 1979, Simp- son was elected to the local. ex- ecutive board as a representative of the wiremen’s unit, but was dis- qualified for being in arrears in pay- ment of dues. . If many of the members in Local 213 are confused about what took place during the election campaign, it is understandable. For example, the circular put out by those friend- ly to Simpson was signed ‘‘United Committees For Democracy in the Local,’’ while a leaflet put out by Gee supporters was signed ‘‘Com- mittee for a Return to Democracy in Local 213.” : To add to the confusion, some candidates received the printed en- dorsement of more than one of the groups that were in bitter opposi- tion to each other. Be that as it may, the fact re- mains that Cliff Rundgren has in- stituted an action in Supreme Court against Terry Simpson, Keith Apps, Paul Yorke, Alfred Huston, Robert Duffy, W.A. ‘‘Dusty’’ Rhodes, Richard Mathews and Sharon Boudier. (Some say that his own campaign tactics left much to be desired and much to be criticized.) . According to the Vancouver Registry office of the Supreme Court of British Columbia, in a document dated June 13, 1979, Rundgren is claiming damages, costs and an injunction against fur- ther defamatory statements, and in particular allegations that: 1. ‘*C.D. Rundgren _ has. seized control of the $500,000 strike fund.”’ 3 2. ‘*C.D. Rundgren spent thousands of dollars of your money in a vain attempt to silence his op- position in the union.”’ 3. ‘C.D. Rundgren controls strike funds to the exclusion of our elected trustees. No one knows where the money is, or how much interest is drawn — except Run- dgren.”’ Whether this action will go to trial or whether it will be discon- tinued in return for a written retrac- tion remains to be seen. One thing is certain: problems like joint negotiations, unemploy- ment in the building trades, full Canadian autonomy for the IBEW and the big social questions con- fronting the labor movement are in- evitably downgraded in the kind of » a situation which has prevailed in Local 213 for many years. Too many members are fighting each other instead of uniting to come to grips with common problems. No matter which way the internal and external charges are disposed of, those basic problems will re- main. In the long run, the members themselves will come up with the answers and will isolate those who advance right wing opportunistic policies, along with the ultra-ieft, who, objectively, are tools of the right wing. ~ . ranged from. 4 et MUNRO... Guarantee jobs to get B.C. resources —Munrt Continued from page 1 A resolution.submitted by 1-217 president Syd Thompson condemn- ed the actions of PP WC members from the MacMillan Bloedel Har- mac operation in Nanaimo for picketing IWA operations in Van- couver for three days during the balloting on the new collective agreement in July. The resolution calling for observance of B.C. Federation of Labor procedures for secondary picketing, was over- whelmingly supported by the con- vention, but not before some delegates objected to the vindictive tenor of the attack on the PPWC. Munro also wanted endorsement of a hard line position with Building Trades unions over a jurisdictional dispute and in his speech to the con-’ vention told Building Trades representatives that they could ‘‘go jump in a lake.”’ : The IWA leader inferred that part of the problem stemmed from the union of Building Trade unions in the Building Trades Council, and suggested that the IWA and other industrial unions should form an “industrial union’s council.’’ A resolution to that effect had yet to be debated at Tribune press time. The about 200 delegates declined to take up Munro’s fighting stance with the Building Trades, however, and a resolution calling on the leadership to meet with the Trades and work out a jurisdictional pact carried the convention over the op- position of Munro and other regional officers. Monday, Munro gave major at- tention to the union’s forest policy to be distributed widely throughout the province. ‘‘I urge you to do everything you can to get a vastly expanded forestry program going,”’ he urged delegates, ‘‘Help convince MLA’s and MP’s that the forests in PACIFIC RiBUN _ hard line on PPWC, Building Trades. - and pulp has contributed to If Fred Wilson Canada are in trouble and wet correct that situation.” : The union is calling for reforestation program, fin primarily by the provincia federal governments, and for pf sions to ensure that logs are assia) | ed to their highest end use. H The use of peeler logs for rT scale layoffs in the plywoo dustry, Munro charged, and in of assurances from the governil that corrective measures would taken a ‘‘greater number of lay® are threatened.” Departing from official policy, Munro proposed that © tracts between the government! § multinational corporations allo the exploitation of B.C.’s resou should be tied to guarantees employment. ‘‘It is a disgrac our most valuable natural reso are assigned to be exploited private companies who gi¥ guarantee whatever about emp ment,’’ he said, ‘““We have away our most precious mi resources and energy sources Kitimat, of incalculable value, ° there isn’t a contract obli anyone to provide a single jo IWA international pres Keith Johnson addressed del Tuesday and stressed the i tance of restrictions on the & of logs to Japan and other tries. Log exports and reforestation have resulted 1 closures and the loss of 4,000 industry jobs in the Pacific thwest of the U.S., he said. Johnson, a Canadian, sp? length about U.S. politics associated himself and the in tional union with the movem draft U.S. senator Edward Ké for the 1980 presidential electl@ Address City or town Postal Code SENOS NN NG NUNN Read the paper that fights for labor oot a avS Sie 010 40% wh. 0 O/ete 2 0 0 ule we 8 9 © © be o'r 0 8h.) bone Ree Pe We ey he se ee A ae | am enclosing: 1 year $10 (1) 2 years $18 6 months $6 1 Old New () Foreign 1 year $12 0 Donation $ SOAR AEA LES Pee tee te ek a