SANTIAGO STADIUM: 1973 ... Third Committee. Pinochet's terror condemned by UN UN committee vote indicts junta terror By a vote of 98-14 the United Nations’ Third Committee adopted the strongest yet condemnation of the repression of human rights in Chile by the fascist military junta. The resolution which was sponsored by 33 countries, in- cluding 10 western European countries, now goes to the General Assembly for consideration. It is virtually assured passage in that body. In addition to the 14 negative votes, three countries abstained from voting. Significantly they were the United States, France and the Federal Republic of Germany, all of which have extensive trade links with Chile. The resolution expressed _in- dignation that ‘‘constant and flagrant violations of human rights have taken place and continue to take place in Chile.” Though it was overwhelmingly endorsed, there were attempts to scuttle the resolution, including an announcement by the junta that it intended to release nearly all political prisoners still being held. One prisoner not to be released. however is Luis Corvalan, general secretary of the Communist Party of Chile. The Third Committee resolution made note of the announcement but did not modify or soften its opposition to the junta in any way. A second attempt to divert at- tention from the resolution was launched by countries friendly to the junta which introduced an alternate resolution that would have the United Nations withdraw from dealing with Chile and would have left the Chilean problem in the hands of the Organization of American States. This resolution was dismissed in the Third Committee by a vote of 60-40. The resolution itself invited “member states, United Nations agencies and_ international organizations to take steps which they may consider appropriate as a contribution to the restoration and safeguarding of human rights and fundamental freedoms in Chile.** As well, upon the Chilean junta to “‘restore and safeguard, without delay,’’ basic human rights and freedoms. The adopted resolution urged all UN member states to ‘‘consider the consequences of the various forms of aid extended to the 4 it specifically called. Chilean authorities.’” This aspect of the resolution is seen by many as a prelude to the call for an economic boycott of Chile. The resolution spelled out a number of specific actions which the junta should immediately undertake, including the ter- mination of the state of emergency in the country, the immediate release of all political prisoners, the restoration of citizenship to exiled Chileans, and the restoration of legal trade unions. Theresolution also reiterated the jong standing UN call to the junta to “‘put an end to torture and other forms of cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment or punish- ment.”’ South Africa a ‘powder mi keg’ says ANC speaker “For many years now, the South African regime has been sitting on a powder keg. Today that powder keg is about to explode.”’ In this way, John Makatini, head of the African bureau of the African National congress, predicted that violent change in South- Africa was imminent. He was speaking to a Vancouver audience of about 150 people on the first stop of a cross Canada tour by ANC members, bringing with him reports on events in South Africa and an assessment of the future direction of events in that country. Makatini was originally scheduled to speak along with Sikose Nji, an eyewitness to the Soweto uprisings of last June, but she was detained by Canadian Immigration authorities and refused a visa to enter Canada. He warned his audience that the South African regime of prime minister Jan Vorster could be likened to Hitlerite Germany. Makatini cited a 1942 speech by Vorster in which he described the philosophy of his National Party. “Christian Nationalism is called Fascism in Italy and National Sociialism in Germany.”’ Makatini said that many thought that fascism was defeated in 1945 but, “We (the ANC) are convinced that it is rearing its ugly head in South Africa today.” He sharply condemned _ the “duplicity” of certain western countries, Canada included, “for voting to condemn the policies of South Africa while at the same time bolstering that regime.’’ Makatini was particularly critical of countries such as France which he said “‘were arming South Africa to the teeth, even to the point of selling that regime nuclear reactors knowing full well that South Africa is not a signatory to” the non-proliferation treaty.”’ He cited as an example of western involvement in South Africa the fact that during the Soweto uprisings French helicopters hovered over the crowds spraying tear gas. Makatini reviewed some of the many international and. United Nations sanctions imposed against South Africa over the years, in- cluding an arms embargo in 1963 and the adoption of a resolution calling for economic sanctions against South Africa passed by the United Nations General Assembly in 1964. - , Since the adoption of that resolution,” he stressed, ‘‘western economic involvement in. South Africa has increased. This can be seen as preparing the ground work for actual military intervention under the guise of protecting economic interests as_ the Americans did in Viet Namm “The sweat and the blood of the African people is being tran- sformed into billions of dollars of profits to be defended by western interests”’ he charged. Makatini said that the events in Soweto ‘‘were not riots as the western press says, but were uprisings. Those events were the beginning of revolution in South Africa.’’ He conceded that as yet, such uprisings were still sporadic, but said that the spread of. the uprisings through the country last June showed positively that ‘‘there exists a revolutionary situation in that country.” He said that the ANC had called upon the international community to actively support the uprisings and provide material assistance to the African people. Makatini reported that the ANC was ‘‘heartened’’ by the decisions of the 31st session of the United Nations which declared the South African regime illegitimate and recognized the legitimacy of the national liberation movement. As well, the UN has recognized the legitimacy of armed struggle by the liberation movements of South Africa, and declared June 16 as the International Day of Solidarity with the South African people. It is in the United Nations that Canada has a particular role to play, Makatni said, and noted that _ the aT ENE AT JOHN MAKATINI Canada will assume a seat on the J security council in the near future.’ “The security council will have to deal with a resolution calling for 4p total arms embargo on South D Africa, and the Canadian people 4, can pressure the government Ohi Canada to support that resolution. With the pressure from the people of Canada, the government o . Canada can be forced into playing a less negative role in the United Nations.”’ Canadian trade movement to take up the questi or of a boycott of South African goods. He said that the ANC had launched such a campaign in 1959, but now), feels that it is the time to step up that boycott, and referred to the actions of the Italian trade union movement which refused to ser- vice South African planes oF handle goods destined for South’ Africa in the wake of the Sowetd, massacres. He said that this is the type of action which the ANC hopes that the Canadian trade union movement will consider, and suggested that such an_ action might be centred around the June 16 day of solidarity. South Africa pushing sales of Krugerrand ‘An investment in oppression’ Consumers in this country are being asked to invest in human oppression. What is perhaps worse, they are being asked to make that in- vestment as a gift ‘‘toa loved one.”’ It involves purchasing a Krugerrand, a coin of pure gold weighing exactly one troy once. Its origin? — South Africa. The Krugerrand is minted of gold taken from the apartheid mines of the Vorster regime. Crushed within it are the lives of countless thousands of Black miners, an average of three of whom die on each shift in the gold mines of the country. Yet coin dealers across North America — and elsewhere — are selling the coins, and although they are not being promoted in this country with the same _ high- powered campaign as in the U.S. where $4 million has been allotted for advertising, the purpose is nevertheless the same to provide much-needed funds for the internationally isolated racist government of South Africa. A cursory check of Vancouver dealers carried out this week revealed that the coin is readily available through most regular coin outlets in the city. One dealer, Monarch International, reported that it carried the coin but was * PACIFIC TRIBUNE—DECEMBER 3, 1976—Page 10 se csbpals out of stock’’ and suggested another dealer which did have supplies. Department stores also reported having the coin. The Hudson’s Bay coin and stamp department even quoted a price of $159.50 — sub- stantially more than the current gold price of $130 per ounce. ° The prime market for the Krugerrand is the investment- conscious middle class and the advertising campaign has been devised accordingly. Although Canadian official opinion has presumably dictated — that the sales campaign be on a much lower profile in this country, much of the U.S. advertising, where the campaign is_ highly visible, reaches a Canadian audience via American television stations. And prime time is being used. ee One such television ad shows a man placing a Krugerrand pen- dant around a woman’s neck as a voice says: ““Youmay have givena loved one: a gift in 14 carat or even 18 carat gold. But did you ever give an ounce of pure gold?” ‘But none of the ads tell the prospective buyer of the origin of the coins, their history — or the purpose of their sale. Created by the South African Chamber of Mines as a replica of a THE KRUGERRAND . discontinued coin, the Se a is named after a president of South Africa, Kruger, whose comments in his memoirs that “‘the savages must be kept within bounds”’ have been embodied in the apartheid system. Behind the drive to market the coins is the instability of the South African economy and the _in- creasing isolation of South Africa as a result of the brutal repression of demonstrations in the Black townships. Inflation in the country is run- ‘hopes to sell one million of the coins. The marketing drive has . the gold of apartheid. ning atan annual rate of 11 percent while the foreign trade deficit has reached a staggering $2 billion and continues to climb. Substantial overseas sales would go a long way towards alleviating pp some of South Africa’s financia’ difficulties and the Vorster regim® been stepped up to achieve thosé sales by Christmas. Only a state like South Afric) could so pervert the ‘spirit 0 Christmas.