N socialist lands there is no un- ployment. There is no inflation "er. Nor are there private pro- Taining the economy. Profits PM steadily rising productivity © plowed back into the re aiid and into social require- | The €conomy is planned. This Fans the complex tasks facing Sem society are planned for Fople. It explains why socialist puntries can afford free medical Orks of daycare, the very _Tecreation and_ sport {£lities, It also helps explain why, in- ! ad of millions of unemployed, Te are shortages of workers in y fields. Education is the key More highly skilled workforce |-. SOcialist education is or- Zed to meet society’s needs. IS includes all levels and ches of education — primary ol, universities and technical ftanteed work in their field N graduation. How could it be otherwise? Is it Ceivable that people should be filed the basic right to work ‘Maps a comparison between two main social systems — Pitalism and socialism — might Prought down to some specific ses: | The Construction Industry |~anada’s construction industry =o claimants either not being 4 fiat of their rights to appeal, or +, -28 to do so out of fear or for €f Teasons. A Single Parent i ne Ons told of a Canadian : ral Electric worker, a single ; aa with children to support, hile . benefits were ended re ne: layoff. Thinking it must Vora Misunderstanding, the old si Went to the UIC and was ted io no mistake. They re- 8 er to the local welfare of- Do €r she asked how she was Boone ther family without any se then went to her union eR Successfully argued with ‘da, rial of Referees that she , a adequate number of job e Se Joining that 20% with ‘ Una to tackle the big- : SS-serving, government D Y, her action and the UE’s er Compelled the UIC to: pay ~ 9800 in Stolen benefits: : anther CGE worker con- Ost he With the same situation tision T appeal. The arbitrary de- Ont the local UIC’s benefit ay Officer that was required Ordey three job searches re- lo her Per day or 15 per week led & being cut off after criss- ing colleges. Students are’ has ground to a halt. Construction unemployment is rising by 400 men a week in Toronto alone. In Ontario 20.8% of the workers are jobless. In some cities: the figure has hit 80%. Where’s the logic? This coun- try has a desperate shortage of housing at rates people can af- ford. Apartment vacancies in many areas are less than 17% and single dwelling homes are priced out of range for all but top income families. = A shortage of housing and mas- sive unemployment in the con- . struction industry — that’s free enterprise! It’s the stupid and tragic outcome of government policy which worships profit, the developers, the mortgage com- panies, banks and land sharks. The people pay triple — by high ‘rents, taxes and mortgage rates, by high unemployment and pov- erty and by a lack of decent homes in which to live. * OK OK The. USSR improved housing conditions for 11 million of its citizens last year, building 2.2 million apartments and houses. Hungary built 94,000 flats, Czechoslovakia 132,000 and Romania 138,000 in 1976. Po- land’s housing construction went up 4% and Bulgaria’s 6% in the same period. The German Demo- cratic Republic improved housing conditions for 450,000 people last year. ; crossing Toronto to record 27 job searches in 34 days. The fact her husband is too sick to work and requires some attention, and that she lives in Mississauga, making the use of public transit in her job searches expensive, didn’t make an impact on the Board of Referees. Flimsiest Reasons In most cases, Armstrong said, the disqualified claimants are not told until after they are cut off how many job searches are re- quired or the number of sup- posedly available job openings. The hyprocisy of the whole system is reflected in the fact the: Unemployment Insurance Act doesn't even specify a number of required’ weekly job searches, other than that the claimant must make a ‘‘reasonable and custom- ary effort” to find work. The UE representative pointed out, the majority of the cases ‘which are appealed are won be- cause the claimants are cut off for the flimiest of reasons. ‘It appears’’ she said, “the benefit control officers have to knock off 40% from the rolls of thosé receiving benefits to make up Cullen’s $300-million, and they’re doing it any way they can.” - Workers and socialism ’ Ts there a crisis in the construc- tion industry in socialist coun- tries? Are there jobless workers? _ The opposite is the case. Techni- cal training schools. and all @ branches of education are under pressure to train more workers, increase their skills and know- ledge for the work to be done. Women in the Workforce Women in Canada make up ab- out 40% of our workforce. How- ever, they earn only 55% of what men earn annually. Quick mathematics will tell you what this figure means in extra profits for their employers. © It’s also simply untrue that women work only as a second source of income. A full 43% of Canada’s 3.5 million working women are single, separated or divorced and many support de- pendents. In 1974 women provided sole support for 261,230 families and 60% of these families lived below the poverty level. Low paying jobs, lack of daycare and absence of protective laws make the _Canadian workplace a dis- criminatory experience for Cana- dian working women. It’s appa- rent that human rights for Cana- dian women are sacrificed in the interests of the Almighty Dollar. As pointed out elsewhere on th- ese pages, more than 100,000 Canadian women want to work but can’t for lack of. daycare facilities. kok In socialist countries it is illegal to pay women less than men for work of equal value. These laws are clear-cut and enforced. In the USSR, women comprise 51% of the workforce. Unlike here, Soviet women en- gage in all spheres of work requir- ing highly-developed skills and education — they make up 35% of design engineers, 45% of technological engineers, two- thirds of management, four-fifths of the country’s medical staff. Women comprise half the USSR’s students at all levels and six of every 10 economists. Thirty-five percent of the coun- try’s parliamentarians are women and 48% of local elected officials. Daycare is universal and more than 10.5 million children attend with 72% of the cost covered by state funds. Mothers are allowed 112 days pre and post delivery time at full pay regardless of length of service. In the German Democratic Republic the time is a full 26 weeks. In that country 86% of women are employed. Equality, then, includes the right to work. It means equal training, and opportunity as well as equal pay for work of equal value. It means the right, guaran- teed to all socialist citizens, not to suffer from unemployment. All this is codified in socialist law and made a reality by socialist plan- ning. BACK TO WORK! Priorities must be turned around. The crisis in human and economic terms cries out for solu- tions. Federal and provincial gov- ermment policies, catering as they do to big business, cannot solve the crisis. These policies brought on the economic depression and created the 1.5 million unem- ployed. They are responsible for today’s widespread misery. ‘*Put Canada Back to Work!” is the need of the day. This is the Communist Party slogan heading its campaign. It is the demand which sums up a series of im- mediate and long-term proposals to overcome the economic crisis Canada has been thrust into. The need now is for united mass action to force basic change: for development of broad people’s movements around specific demands to impel a turn- around in our economy. The fightback, beginning with the labor movement and including the Communist Party, New Demo- cratic Party, democratic organi- zations, must be increased in face of the present employer- government attack. The demands must include an immediate end to the wage- cutting Bill C-73 and an end to attacks on the unemployed. They should reject ‘‘deals’’ and ‘*agreements’’ which are aimed at guaranteeing unbridled corpora- tions profits, continued hikes in living costs while holding work- ers’ wages down and restricting the hard-won principle of collec- tive bargaining. “Put Canada Back to Work”’ should include: e A vast housing program to provide accommodations at prices © of e s) . working people can afford; e A public works and voca- tional training program at trade union rates of pay; e Reduced taxes for low and medium incomes; e Reduced hours of work — 30 at 40 hours’ pay; e Earlier retirement policies” based on substantial increase in pensions; e Establishment of child care centres; e Extension of trade with the socialist countries and with the Third World; ' e A 50% cut in the arms program. In a longer term sense, only a basic change in approach will guarantee a constantly develop- ing economy. The overall control of Canada’s economic, social and political life by huge corpora- tions, the majority of them foreign-owned, means continued crisis and unemployment, higher living costs and a steady decline in people’s living standards. The gap between rich and poor will continue to widen. The Communist Party prop- oses democratic ownership and control .of the huge multi-na- | tionals, the development of our rich natural resources for our people’s needs, the building of secondary industry and re- direction into the economy of bill- ions wasted for arms. These are expansion policies, policies geared to redistribute the country’s wealth in favor of work- ing people. These are policies to end the disgrace of mass unem- | ployment and launch into economic growth. These are the policies the federal budget should be advancing. : The Communist Party contingent at the Oct. 14 Day of Protest in Toronto. Slogans carried go beyond the defeat of Bill C-73 and call for economic control of foreign multi-nationals, ownership of our natural resources and a cutback on profits, not wages. x