Can Jersey Joe beat Charles again ? 4 my O EVENT in the realm of Sports attracts more world at- tention than a heavyweight championship fight. But no heavyweight title bout in recent years “has caused less public stir than the June engagement of champion Jersey Joe Walcott and Ezzard Charles. This is hardly to be wonder- ed at. Walcott, a ring veteran Who hit the heavyweight jack- Pot after five tries, has shied away from defending his crown Mm the year since he scored an Upset kayo victory over Charles, His hopes of picking up some €asy moola on the side failed to jell, so economics finally forced him to sign for the re- turn bout with Charles. Boxing promoters want to get tid of Walcott, who is long past his prime and is not a box-of- fice draw. On the other hand, they aren’t too happy about the Prospects of Ezzard Charles, who really an overgrown light- heavyweight and no more color- ful than the ancient Jersey Joe. Since the Joe Louis era boxing has been in the doldrums, in the Case of the heavyweight di- Vision. Only bright spot, from the promoters’ viewpoint, is the Tise of Rocky Marciano, but the Brockton belter is still raw and @wkward in the ring, and many of his “spectacular” victories have been carefully arranged by Al Wein, When Walcott and Charles lash, can Jersey Joe repeat his stunning upset of last year, when he flattened Ezzard with a left hook in the seventh stanza? Most of the experts say ‘‘No.”’ Charles won two previous en- counters, they point out, and Walcott won last time out only because he was ‘‘a very hungry old man with a big family to feed.” The experts overlook one ‘thing, and that is that Jersey Joe hasn’t profited financially from holding the title and is just as hungry now as he was last year, He’s looked into an empty cupboard and answered the question, “TV or not TV?” by letting a television outfit cover his training for the Charles fight —- a dangerous procedure, and brought on strictly from hunger. Not so many years ago fighters employed ‘‘spies” to sneak into an opponent’s training camp and report back on .his opponent’s condition, type of training, and so on.. Now all Charles has to do is switch on his TV set and look Joe over. Lack of public interest in the Waléott-Charles fight doesn’t ~ mean that it may not be a good serap. History shows that some. of the most lauded battles turn out to be duds, while bouts that appear to be one-sided or dull on’ paper prove thrillers. ‘When Jack Johnson and Jim Jeffries clashed at Reno, Neva- da, on July 4, 1910, with Tex JERSEY JOHK WALCOTT Rickard as promoter and also acting as third man in the ring, excitement was- at fever pitch and Jeff’s followers were sure he’d win back the title. But the fight itself was never close. Johnson toyed with his slow, lumbering opponent and finally put him away. Jess Willard was a prohibitive favorite to lick Jack Dempsey when they met at Toledo under a broiling sun on July 4, 1919, in another Rickard promotion. Jess weighed 245 to Dempsey’s 188, and towered over the tan- ned ex-miner, Prior to the bout he had predicted a quick and easy win. But at the bell Dempsey tore into the giant Wil- lard, smashed him to the floor seven times, and almost anni- hilated him. At the end of the third round the bulky champ threw in the towel. The “Battle of the Century” ‘between Dempsey and the French war hero, Georges Car- pentier, drew the first million dollar gate in ring history, but, the fight hardly lived up to e6x- pectations, Dempsey winning easily in four frames. On the other hand, when Dempsey met Luis, Angel Firpo, the Wild Bull of the Pampas, the champ looked like an easy winner, knocking Firpo to the canvas five times in quick suc- cession as the fight opened. Then the Wild Bull swung a roundhouse right which lifted Jack clean out of the ring, turn- ed the battle into one of the most sensational title defenses ever staged. The moral is: No one knows what will happen in a heavy- weight fight. Even Charles and Walcott may produce some thrills and chills, though the odds are against such a pleasant prospect. Clippers win twice in a row PACIFIC TRIBUNE Clippers, who got away to a bad start in the Industrial Baseball Leagueé this. season by losing three straight games, hit their stride over the weekend, whipping Longshoremen 3-1 Saturday and coming from pehind to beat Nisei 4-3 Monday night. Longshoremen scored the op- ening run in the first frame Sat- urday, but Clippers tied the score in the second and produced two more runs in the fifth to put the game on ice. Gerry Blitch hurled a fine game for Clippers and got good backing from his team-mates, Nisei took a three-run lead Monday, but the PT boys scored two in the fifth on Tony Sloan’s homer, and another run in the sixth tied the score. In the last of the seventh Bob Everett drew a walk, stole second, advanced to third on an infield out, and came home on Ray Andrus’ sharp drive to centre field. Clippers’ next games at Pow- ell Street Grounds are against Boilermakers on Tuesday, June 3, and Western Bridge, Satur- day, June 7. “we'd appreciate a bigger cheering section of Pa- cific Tribune readers,’’ say the PT ball players. A left. hook li see Seats Fc be ke this one kayoed Charles last time. SPORTLIGHT By BERT WHYTE MAYBE IT is those new glamor uniforms the Nut House gals are sporting this year, or maybe it is just the good brand of ball, . but crowds are flocking to Kerrisdale park every Monday, Wednes- day and Friday to watch Senior A women’s softball. Methinks it’s a combination of the two. The long-stemmed Nut House beauties are pleasing to the eye (see cut) and the teams are all playing heads-up ball for this time of the season. Nut House and Western Mutuals appear to be the two strongest teams in the league, and the rivalry between them is bound to become a drawing card in the next few weeks. Mutuals have never forgiven Nut House for knocking them out of the play- offs in three straight games last fall, after Mutuals had led the league all season, Mutuals have perhaps the best chucker in girls’ softball, Laura Nelson, but the Nut House have two top hurlers in veteran Grace Granberg and former pro mound star Ethel Ramsay. cae * * ‘COMMENTING ON Ty Cobb’s recent blast at modern ballplay- ers, editor Bruce Jacobs of Sport Life classifies Cobb as one of those guys who believes that “everything was better yester- day.’’ He writes: “Ty Cobb remembers that baliplayers in his day were bet- ter. But like the soldier who has fought a war in. mud, disease and blood and then only recalls the leave in Paris, the free-flowing wine, and the attentions of an affectionate girl, Cobb has over- looked the stew bums, the ill- conditioned eccentrics, and the low level of sportsmanship that prevailed in his day.’’ = * * * BARGAIN BASEMENT: Winner of last week’s dollar was Myron Glucksman, 6729 Gran- ville, who correctly named Cy Young as the big league baseball ster who won more than 500 games (he won 5/1). This week's question: Who did Jéhn L. Sullivan win the heavy- weight championship from? Win a buck by being the first reader to mail the right answer to Bert Whyte, Pacific Tribunte, Room 6, 426 Main Street, Vancouver. PACIFIC TRIBUNE — MAY 30, 1952 — PAGE 11