- defence - GURNAM’SANGHERA . . . Packed rally urges unity, action to counter racism By DAN KEETON | Racism is a problem for all » not just the minorities it is directed against, and a unified effort is necessary to pressure government and law enforcement agencies to take action against Tacist groups and racially Motivated acts. That was the message Sunday hight as community, civic and labor representatives addressed a ~ fullhhouse at the Ladner Communi- ty Centre Jan. 18 rally called by the East Indian Workers’ Association. About 350 people came to ex- Press their revulsion at the Tesurgence of racism in the com- -Munity, dramatized by the racist arson attack against the Sidhu home in Ladner Jan. 3. The need for a united people’s front to combat that resurgence Was stressed by the many speakers who addressed the rally. EIWA member Gurnam Sanghera, who provided transla- tions in both Punjabi and English, hoted that “‘racism always has a target — it just happens to be East now.’ Former Fishermen’s Union President Homer Stevens echoed Sanghera’s remarks, recalling that Tacism had been one of the major hurdles the union had to cross in Organizing the fishing industry. Stevens also took on the ad- vocates of ‘‘self-defense is the only Wway,”” warning it would leave minority groups open to attack. .. “Self-defense doesn’t unite us — It just breaks us up into small “gelf- only HOMER STEVENS. approach- a. Separates us into small groups.’ groups. We need to unite against racism,”’ he said to applause. Jarmail Chandhi, vice-president of the EIWA, emphasized that racism was ‘‘not just a problem for East Indians. “‘It is a problem for all Canadians,’’ he said. Emphasizing the decisive role of organized labor in combating racism, Sanghera stated the ETWA’ policy that members must work withing their respective unions to ensure that they takeastandagainst racism, noting that in the absence of such action, “the Klan might _ creep in.’ Racial discrimination via civic legislation was the theme of Rich- mond alderman Harold Steves and Vancouver alderman Harry In the mid-70’s, a right-wing Richmond city council, acting on complaints filed by individuals, cracked down on those forced to live in substandard ‘‘illegal suites,”’ a majority of whom turned out to be East Indian families, said Steves. Currently the right-dominated council is prosecuting those adults whose parents are living with them, an action affecting mainly non- white families who do not share the North American tradition of the limited nuclear family, Sie noted. One result of this legal Ae ment, said the Richmond alder- man, is that many people are afraid to register as civic voters, for fear the city may investigate their premises. “The best way to clear up the il- legal suites problem is to have enough housing for everybody,” stated Vancouver’s Harry Rankin, who reviewed some of. his ex-- periences with racism at city hall. He cited former fire chief Armand Koenig’s refusal to reconsider height and weight qualifications for firemen, and city council’s inac- tion in cases of racial discrimina- tion at several city discotheques. Rankin also tackled the accusa- tion from the B.C. Civil Liberties Union that his publicly stated call for the abolition of the Klanin B.C. violated the right of free speech. ‘No-one has the right to yell ‘fire’ in a crowded theatre. I say to those well-meaning people who would defend the Klan’s right to speak that the KKK has a history of . Murder and violence. .Don’t be “East indians are now the targets of racism. fooled by their so-called ‘new im- Official foot-dragging and government reluctance to act against the Klan or even to admit the existence-of racially motivated . violence was cited a other speakers. Stevens noted that some of- ficials, quoted in the Delta Op- timist, tried to play down the recent Ladner arson case ‘‘as if this was bad publicity for Delta.” B.C. Coalition Against Racism chairperson Delicia Crump noted the local police were treating the at- tack as an isolated case of teenage vandalism rather than part of a growing tendency towards racially- motivated violence in Canada. ‘“‘The Klan has clearly violated the Criminal Code of Canada,” Crump said, in reviewing her organization’s hitherto unsuc- cessful efforts to wrest the necessary permission from B.C. attorney-general Allan Williams to allow prosecution of the KKK under the criminal code. The next step, she said, is to peti- tion solicitor-general Robert Kaplan. It that fails, there are plans to take the case to the United Na- tions, and from there to make it an international protest. ‘*All we are asking the attorney- general for is permission to take the Klan to court. If the law is found to be weak, we'll work for it’s change,”’ she said. Shiv Narian Singh Basi, presi- dent of the Khalsa Diwan (Sikh Temple) Society in Victoria, told the audience in Punjabi, ‘Racism is acancer which must be cut out — and it is the unity of the people which will do the surgery.” Other speakers at the rally in- cluded North Vancouver alderman Ernie Crist, representing the Marineworkers and. Boilermakers ~ Industrial Union; Jit Singh Ankhi, president of the EIWA; Phil Zander from the Telecommunica- tions Workers.Union and Graham Hope, a commissioner with the . B.C. Human Rights Commission. The meeting unanimously en- dorsed a resolution condemning “all violent attacks of racism’’ and calling on government to use all ex- TRIBUNE PHU! US—SEAN GRIFFIN isting laws to bring those guilty of racist acts to justice and to ban the KKK. Vancouver city council will be urging the Greater Vancouver Regional District to pass by the Feb. 1 deadline set by Socred minister Bill Vander Zalm to agree to his decision to purchase the automated light rapid transit system and to accept along term deficit sharing arrangement. Vander Zalm has delivered -an ultimatum to the GVRD to accept his rapid transit package by Feb. 1 or else he would estab- lish a new body under his con- trol to replace the GVRD’s tran- sit functions. The GVRD will meet to con- sider Vander Zalm’s threat and 000 GVRD analysis of the On- tario ALRT system proposed by Vander Zalm as opposed to the conventional _LRT originally proposed by the GVRD at a spe- cial meeting of the regional board Jan. 27. ~ _ However at a special meeting of Vancouver city council Jan. 20 to discuss the city’s stance at the GVRD, Vander Zalm was under heavy attack for attempt- ing to impose an untested sys- tem on the region. Vancouver council invited delegations to speak to the issue and heard unanimous con- demnations of the provincial government. Sol Jackson of the Committee of Progressive Elec- tors (COPE), Nathan Davido- wicz of the Killarney Champlain Heights Citizens for Action and Dez Turner of Citizens For ly for a conventional LRT sys- tem. The elevated, sanonnisted sys- tem. would blight neighbor- hoods below it and create a safe- ty hazard because of its ‘hot rails,’? warned Jackson: The is- sue of Canadian content is a red herring, he added because the conventional system, although a European design, has an equal amount of Canadian content. Citizens for Rapid Transit ar- _ gued that the conventional sys- tem is more versatile and can be tunnelled underground through busy intersections, a superior route to elevating the system overhead. Arepresentative of the Amal- gamated Transit Union said that any system must be man- ned, whether it is automated. or not. Public safety in the event of equipment malfunctions, or crisis situations require person- nel on duty, he said. Communist Party Greater Vancouver regional chairman Fred Wilson also spoke and stressed the motive of the pro- vincial government in attempt- ing to impose a system on the GVRD from the top down ‘‘and in the most reactionary and re- gressive manner possible.”” The financing of the rapid question, he said, and until it is resolved the debates over the rel- ative merits of different systems are meaningless. He called for a ‘‘realistic as- sessment of the actual costs’’ be- ginning with the $74 million def- icit the bus only system incurred in 1980. This year the deficit is expected to inflate by-14 per- \_ cent, according to Urban Tran- GVRD urged to defy Vander Zalm fransit ultimatum the recommendations of a $30,- - stantially increased to substitute Rapid Transit all argued strong- - ‘the system,” he said. transit project is the decisive - Said. sit Authority figures, and at that rate the deficit for the present system will be in the order of $160 million by 1986-1987. If rapid transit is added to the system and financed according to the Socred plan, by borrow- ing the money through the issu- ance of bonds, the $460 million capital cost which the GVRDes- timates the ALRT system would add $60 million per year in fi- nancing costs to the transit sys- tem’s deficit. “If we are truthful with the public, they must be told that we must meet a deficit of about $220 million in 1986-1987 and of over $320 million by 1991,”’ he said. “The present hydro and gas taxes will come nowhere. near meeting these costs. That is why the city of Vancouver finance department warned a year ago that property taxes would be needed to support the system by 1984. “Clearly this is an unaccept- able result of the present finan- cial formula. We cannot accept that property taxes throughout Greater Vancouver will be sub- for the province’s responsibility to provide a basic social service.” A second unacceptable result of the present formula cited was a steady increase in transit fares to over $1 within a few years, be- cause of the requirement that fares must cover 35 percent of operating costs. The alternative to substantial property tax increases with the present formula is a huge in- crease in the gas tax, which Wil- son said the party has ‘‘unquali- fied opposition”? for. The gas tax is a regressive tax applied on- ly to consumers while leaving the oil industry and automobile industry untouched, he said. “Tt is our opinion that if the GVRD told Vander Zalm ‘no deal’ to his present ultimatum and instead presented realistic counter demands, there is no question that the GVRD would have overwhelming public sup- port,”’ he said. Wilson urged the GVRD to renounce the present transit ser- vice agreement with the prov- ince’s Urban Transit Authority and to demand a new deal which would see the province pay the great majority, if not all, of transit deficits and which would eliminate the‘pegging of fares at 35 percent of operating costs. The new agreement must pro- vide for rapid transit without adding financing costs to the op- erating costs of the system, ‘‘be- cause that will break the back of In Moscow and Mexico City vast rapid transit systems oper- ate with fares equivalent to about a nickel in Canadian coin, he added, because in those countries mass transportation is. treated as a social necessity and— funded in the same manner as education and health, by a pro- gressive tax system to appropri- ate wealth at its source, from in- dustry ard resources. ‘“There is no other way that we will have a decent transit system here,’’ he y, PACIFIC TRIBUNE—JAN. 23, 1981—Page3