8, : ‘Novenber 26th, 1973

“Clubs withia the Gity of ‘Port ‘Coquiclan be 50. notified, a Carried, .

City Eng.re _ ae From the City Engineer, Novenber 23rd, 1973, further t to nis nenoran- -
min.frtg.-Lot. 161, 2 >
Plan: 42669. | dum of Novenber 16th, 1973 and to the Council" s “resolution ‘passed ‘November
i i : “19th, 1973: “That “the 3 request. sof the city Ungineer set forth in a a menoran~
-dum dated Novenber Leth, 1973. ¢ £0. “exenpt a proposed | subdt vision of Lot. 161,
Plan 42669 | from the mininum in frontage. requirenent of the City! s Subdivision
By-lew, be tabled until the question of charges . for the water utility Future
capital ‘expenditures : is 5 resolved", ¥ requesting that the previous request be
reconsidered in view of a ‘Teport that will be forthcoming to the (Gity
. Adwinistrator from the Approving Officer which should resolve the question
of charges | for water r wetliey future capital expenditures te subdivisions,

and advising that in this case the Developer has agreed to > provide,

the $300, 00 per Jot proposed charge and 18s 400.00 has been received by the

City ‘Treasurer.

Moved by Alderman Meyer:

Seconded by Alderman Laking:

That the request of the City Engineer set forth in- menoranduns dated

November 16th and. 23rd, 1973, respectively, to exempt the proposed Subdivi-
sion of Lot 161, “Plan 42669 ‘from. the nininun frontage requirenent of the
city’ s Subdivision Bylaw, be approved. _— . carried,
BY-LAWS : |

The City Clerk advised that following consideration at a Public Hear-
ing held on ‘Novenber ‘oth, 1973, By-laws Nos. 1284, 1285, and 1287 proposed

. to anend the NCdty of Port Coquitlam Zoning By-tay, 1969, No. 918" and to

authorize jssuance of a. Land Use Cont ract, were now available for third

reading. *

Zon.Amand .B/law “Moved bs by Alderman Laking:
#1284-3rd dg

Seconded by Alderman “Thompson:
| “That By-law ws No, 1286 be read, a third time. oo Carried.

Prior | to. passage of the foregoing resolution, Alderman Ranger pointed
out “that the F Planning & Zoning Committee had recommended | to the applicants |
‘that. they purchase 2077 Suffolk hvenue as “part of the overall | development -
of the. parking lot, whieh has not been done | to date, and. st d his view
that this is a-must in approving the application. - ae Ranger { further we
advised that ie the property is not purchased when the ‘By-law is presented

for final reading, he wild vote » against it. Alderman aking pointed out os

1 that an ‘old ‘gentleman occupies ‘the premises at ‘the present time, and that.