THE WESTERN CANADIAN LUMBER WORKER DUSTY DEATH — PNEUMOCONIOSIS, THE MAN-MADE PLAGUE KILLS THOUSANDS OF INDUSTRIAL WORK From time immemorial men have been dying of lung dis- ease caused by breathing dust at work. More than thirty in- dustries are listed as carrying a risk of this disease called “pneumoconiosis” or ‘miner's lung.” The question of industrial dust in operations under IWA certification has been raised from time to time at Local Union Safety Council meet- ings, Regional Safety Confer-_ ences and Regional Conven- tions. For the education and infor- mation of IWA Camp and Plant Accident Prevention Committees as well as all other persons interested in the field of safety, the Lumber Worker has reproduced an article by Dr. Robert Murray — medical adviser to the British Trade Union Congress — published in October 1967 by the Interna- tional Labour Office in Geneva. eon eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeEeEeEeEeEeEeEeEeEeEeEE Dust is a killer. All over the world thousands of work- ers die every year from its malevolent effect on the lungs causing the disease, pneumo- coniosis. The coal mines of Europe, Asia and America, the gold mines of Africa and India, the asbestos mines of Canada and South Africa, the quarries of Hong Kong, the potteries of Britain and Japan, foundries, textile mills, iron works, building sites — even the manufacture of household cleaning powders — all con- tribute their quota to the toll of death and disability caused by dust. DUST CONTROL Dust control in Britain is relatively good, yet every year in this country alone something like 3,000 workers die with fibrosis of the lungs. The figure for 1965 was 3,019. ' I say “with” rather than “of” because there will have been some cases where the disease was not the major cause of death. The point is that all these people had fibrosis of the lungs when they died and that their lives were short- ened by the disease. In spite of advances in dust control and medical treatment the annual death rate has not materially changed in the last ten years in Britain. Improve- ments in some industries ap- pear to be outweighed by de- terioration in others. Two things must be borne in mind, however. Death from pneu- moconiosis is not immediate. It is caused by the slow and insidious effects of prolonged exposure, so that deaths to- day represent working condi- tions twenty or more years ago. At the same time, meth- ods of diagnosis are improv- ing so that cases are recog- nized today, both clinically and for compensation pur- poses, more readily than in the past. DUST DISEASE Before causing or contribut- ing to premature death, dust disease of the lungs produces disability, varying from slight breathlessness on effort in the early stages of the disease to severe shortness of breath and | total incapacity for work in the advanced stages. Because dust kills slowly, a more appropriate figure than actual deaths for indicating the effect of working condi- tions today is the number of new cases reported each year. In Britain these figures are kept for the purpose of work- men’s compensation under the National Insurance (Ind us- trial Industries) Acts. On the face of it, they show a very heartening improvement, the total having fallen steadily from 3,654 in 1960 to 1,403 in 1965. But there is no reason for complacency in these fig- ures. By far the greater num- ber of cases in Britain are caused by coal mining, and here indeed there has been dramatic progress. But more than 30 other industries are listed in the returns and there is no apparent improvement at all in these taken together. IN BRITAIN In Britain, generally outside the coal industry, the position seems to get neither much better nor much worse, but there are some industries in which the number of cases diagnosed has risen quite con- siderably in recent years. In asbestos manufacture, for ex- ample, cases of pneumoconio- sis reported to the Ministry ‘of National Insurance rose every year between 1960 and 1965, from 29 in the first year to 82 in the latter. That is an increase of around 180 per cent. COAL MINING To obtain a balanced pic- ture, it should be noted that industries other than coal mining account for only about 400 of the new cases of pneu- moconiosis reported in Brit- ain each year. Coal mining accounts for the remainder — about 3,300 in 1960 and just over 1,000 in 1965. At the same time, let us not be mesmerised by statistics. Every one of these hundreds listed in the returns is a hu- man being whose lungs have been diseased by breathing industrial dust. If you are one of those who have contracted the disease outside the coal industry, it can be small con- solation to know that you are “only” one of a group of 400. A soldier wounded in battle cannot be expected to care very much whether it was a big battle or a little one. And if you are a coal miner who has contracted the disease it does not help you personally to know that the statistics for that industry are getting bet- ter. : ON INCREASE | To some extent, of course, these figures reflect the num- ber of persons employed in particular industries, some of which expanded in Britain during the relevant period while others declined. Coal mining declined, though at nothing like the rate at which the disease appears to have been retreating. In develop- ing countries, where old in- dustries are expanding and many new industries are be- ing started, we must be pre- pared for an increase in the risk of industrial diseases in years to come. To say that this is part of the price to be paid for economic advance may appear callous: without industrial development, how- ever, no real attack can be launched against the far greater volume of suffering and sickness caused by pov- erty. The important thing is that government, employers, trade unions and medical sci- ence combine to give the worker the best possible pro- tection against accidents and diseases. Every industrial country which keeps records can show comparable figures to those I have quoted for Britain. And these only represent the vis- ible part of the iceberg. Un- derlying these figures is a great deal of unrecognized ill health — bronchitis for ex- ample — attributable, at least in part, to dust exposure. Ever since man began to make tools he has been creat- ing dust. The first stone age implements were made of flint dug out of flint mines in chalk strata. In Norfolk county in eastern England there is a place called Grimes Graves. These are old flint mines whose main shaft is reputed to be 20,000 years old. Nearby in the town of Brandon flint- knappers are still at work, carrying out the same process by which our stone age an- cestors made their tools and weapons. This process pro- duces silica dust, which in the course of time and in the ab- sence of precautions may lead to the development of silico- sis, one of the group of dis- eases known by the generic term of the pneumoconioses. SILICA DUST Later in man’s development monuments and religious sym- bols were made of sandstone and granite as in ancient Egypt. In the quarrying and dressing of these stones silica dust was produced. At the present time the handling of stone in the building of the Aswan High Dam is very probably producing pneumo- coniosis casualties. In the search for more so- phisticated materials for fuel and weapons, deeper and more extensive mines were dug. Cramped conditions and poor ventilation increased dust exposure and by the six- teenth century they led to the recognition by Paracelsus and Agricola of-the disease known to them as the miners’ disease —- pneumoconiosis. Since mediaeval times, min- ing has become increasingly dusty and the risk has cor- respondingly increased. Today with automatic processing more dust than ever is pro- duced, though fewer men are exposed. In the same way, the more power that is applied to the processes of drilling, grinding, milling and polish- ing in industry, the more — and finer—the dust produced. Unfortunately the technology of dust control does not al- ways keep pace with produc- tion methods. EARLY STAGE Nevertheless, progress in medical and industrial hy- giene has been such that we are now able to detect cases at an early stage and to de- sign methods of control in the light of environmental investi- gations. The more we learn of pneumoconiosis the more effective can be our preven- tive measures. This must be our aim. The disease cannot be cured. It can only be re- vented, : 3 4 - | The precise nature of th damage to the lungs varies with the particular dust. In. general the disease consists ir the development of fibrous or” scar tissue within the spongy substance of the lung, redu ing its elasticity and diminish- : ing the surface area for absorption of oxygen into blood from the air. The pro- | gressive nature of the disease is its most important charac- | teristic, and this is aggravated | by any infection, particularly | tuberculosis, with which th ; disease is frequently associat. | ed. ‘ Dusts such as plaster, ce-4 ment and limestone do not appear to cause any specifi¢ { disease, though large quanti- ties of dust of any kind ar undesirable. Many cases o $ pneumoconiosis arise fron mixed dusts, for example, i t foundries. q Animal and vegetable dusts, can cause asthma in suscept-) ible persons. Upholsterers and. chicken handlers exposed to the dust of feathers are knowf | to suffer from it, as are wood workers exposed to the dus’ of timbers such as teak and| western red cedar. One severe outbreak of asthma in a cot- ton weaving factory was traced to inhaling the dust of tamarind seed used as a size. The dust from mouldy ha’ can give rise to a condition; sometimes resembling pneu> moconiosis called “Farmer’s| sisal dust in the textile indus: try cause a special type 0 dust disease called byssinosi It is the mineral dusts, how ever, which give rise to most severe and pe damage to the lungs. worst of these is silica. Am drilling, crushing, grinding + manipulation of siliceous ma- terials involves the hazard 0 dust inhalation. Mining ané tunnelling, quarrying of gran ite, slate and refractory mé@ terials, the use of ground flint as a constituent of pottery abrasive powders, cleani: castings moulded in san the foundry industry a many other processes are | gerous because of silica | Asbestos is a fibrous sil with a deservedly bad tation. It is used i