A « GREATER VANCOUVER Superstore threatens Coquitlam neighborhoods, business: Parker Coquitlam district council’s right-wing majority has paved the way for a superstore in the municipality — against the advice of their town planner and despite several other studies showing the ruinous effect of such stores on existing businesses and neighbor- hoods. Council voted 4-2 Sept. 18 to change a zoning bylaw at the request of Westfair Properties, which wants to establish a “Real Canadian Superstore” near the Maillard- ville area of Coquitlam, over the opposition of aldermen Eunice Parker and Ray Mit- chuk. Parker, a member of the labor-backed civic group, the Association of Coquitlam Electors (ACE), warned that superstores have a history of replacing smaller, more established businesses, increase traffic and erode the character of surrounding neigh- borhoods. She and Mitchuk, a bank manager who deals with small businesses, argued that Westfair’s claims of increased jobs and taxes for the district were not borne out by previous experience in other municipalities, and are disputed in studies carried out by other Lower Mainland municipalities, “I am not impressed by megaprojects which are always at the expense of real, established businesses,” said Mitchuk. The Real Canadian Superstore project, to be located in Coquitlam’s Mill Creek area and slated for completion in late 1986 or early 1987, will be the latest in a chain of Westfair stores expanding across Canada. When completed, it will be the largest such store in the Lower Mainland, occupying 125,000 square feet. By comparison, the ' average supermarket takes up 30,000 square feet. , The proposals had the enthusiastic back- ing of a council majority — including Mayor Lou Sekora, and aldermen Mae Reid, Brian Robinson and Len Bewley — despite the warnings contained in a report by district planner Donald Buchanan. “There is evidence that medium-size supermarkets suffer closures as a result of superstores,” stated the report in warning of negative impacts on redevelopment plans for, and financially troubled businesses in, the areas of Maillardville, Austin Avenue East and Austin-Ridgeway. Citing studies -done in Edmonton and elsewhere, the planner said superstore char- acteristics include’a single “undifferentiated structure” of more than 70,000'square feet, one-stop shopping, extended shopping hours, “aggressive” marketing and lower labor costs. : The report noted that superstores repres- ent “increased corporate concentration in the food industry” and “aggressive price competition.” While the latter feature holds the promise of reduced retail prices, the report notes that superstores’ low prices are “plateauing in some areas.” “On balance, I cannot recommend in favor of the superstore,” stated the planner, while recommending that, at the least, further studies should be engaged prior to approval. That point wasn’t lost'on Parker, who during council debate after Westfair repre- sentatives had argued for the project said: . “What we’ve heard tonight is questions, not answers.” Parker argued that Vancouver city coun- cil had rejected a superstore proposal, fol- lowing several studies by city staff that showed that “four to five supermarkets close where a superstore opens.” “Tm really afraid that any increase in employment at this store will be at the expense’ of existing employment in this municipality,” she said. Mitchuk said that the stores that close as a result of the superstore would mean dec- lining tax revenues “so at best, the taxes from the superstore would compensate (for the loss).”” He cited a study by North Vancouver city staff which found that the introduction of the Save On Foods superstore has had “a significant impact’ on stores in the city’s Lonsdale Avenue area, while the area has seen four supermarkets close. Parker also charged that council was “rushing” the project. She said council received its first “firm proposal” from Westfair on Sept. 2, while the first reading of the bylaw change allowing the indus- trially zoned land to be used commercially was made on Sept. 8. ACE president Lorna Morford, a candi- date in the fall civic election, said The Real Canadian Superstore would go against the grain of council plans for rejuvenating the affected areas, causing traffic problems and wiping out local business. ““The whole con- cept of a superstore is to reduce costs — how can this create jobs?” she said. EUNICE PARKER.. store impacts done. as Area residents worried about the impact of the development on their neighborhoods. But most of the audience, representing Val- ious business interests in Coquitlam, SUP ported the project. S. Parker said later that in visiting sev businesses in the area she found strong opposition to the project. Be is “Unfortunately, it’s difficult to get those people to a council meeting to defend their interests. Had they done so, the result might . have been different,” she said. ; “One thing is certain — council has done a real disservice to the residents of this district.” oe i ym .no studies on super- “Megaprojects before people’ parks board plan criticized Vancouver’s parks board is denying local improvements to community centres and neighborhoods while funding costly ““mega- projects” for which it has no mandate, three parks commissioners charge. Sue Harris, Connie Fogal and Patricia Wilson, all of the Committee of Progressive Can Vancouver city council do any- thing to create new jobs in Vancouver? The Committee of Progressive Electors believes not only that it can but that it should. That is why COPE has come up with a carefully worked out and realistic plan to create 5,500 new jobs in the city. Our job creation and economic recov- ery program has two major aspects — road construction to provide new trans- portation links and housing. We can greatly improve the movement of car and truck traffic by: a) Solving the traffic bottleneck at Cas- siar and Hastings by building a depressed six lane tunnel and cut connector between Burnaby Freeway and Second Narrows bridge. Its estimated cost is $90 million, with the city’s share amounting to $5 mil- lion. b) A port roadway linking Cardero Street to Renfrew Street. This would not be a commuter roadway and would be designed to fit the needs of the port. Under no circumstances would it infringe on New Brighton park, which belongs to the citi- zens and is not to be meddled with. Nego- tiations would be required to solve the The estimated cost of this roadway would be $50 million, with the city’s share at about $2 million. c) A Grandview and Malkin bypass to connect the Trans Canada Highway with the industrial areas of the city and the port. It would be done in two phases: Slocan Street to Clark Street, and Clark Street to the Georgia Viaduct. The estimated cost is $475 million, of which the city’s share would be $40 million. These three transportation projects main obstacle — Rogers Sugar Refinery. COPE plan has jobs for city would cost $210 million, with the city put- ting up $50 million. Our engineering department estimates that they would generate 2,000 jobs for two years. Our second major job creation project is a housing program for the north shore of False Creek (the current Expo 86 site) that calls for the building of 7,500 housing units. It would include at least 5,000 units of affordable family housing, including co-op and public housing. The cost would be about $600 million. : Most of this would be recovered by the market rents earned by two-thirds of the units; the remaining costs would be nego- tiated with the federal and provincial governments which also have a responsi- bility to provide affordable housing. This housing project would create 3,500 jobs, enough to put most, if not all, unem- ployed construction workers in the Lower Mainland back to work for a full year. Two other important aspects of our job creation program should be noted. The first is that all construction work would have a fair wage clause which would end the unfair advantage of construction out- ‘fits like Kerhoff, which pay far below the union wage. Second, COPE would require that all construction materials and labor be supplied by B.C. firms and the B.C. labor force. We would not permit big international outfits like Hyundai of South Korea to move in and take away jobs from B.C. workers and B.C. compan- ies. ; Our job creation program is in sharp contrast to that of the Non-Partisan Asso- ciation and its mayoralty candidate, Gor- don Campbell. All they have to propose is that the tourist industry should be encour- aged and relied on to create new jobs. Most of those jobs are minimum wage jobs ($3.65 an hour). When the hotels in this city raised their room rates by 70 per cent for the Expo trade, none of the extra profit was passed on to their employees. All the employees got was a bigger work load. Our youth deserve a better future than washing dishes or making up beds at minimum wage. We feel that our program to create 5,500 new jobs is practical and would benefit not only all those who get jobs and their families. These new projects will also make our city a better place in which to live and work. However, these jobs will be realized only if a COPE majority is elected to city council. The NPA doesn’t believe that it is the job of city council to initiate job crea- tion projects. It wants to leave it to private enterprise, despite the fact that the private sector has been unable to come up with any solutions. In a few weeks Expo will be over and another 25,000 to 30,000 people will be out of a job. Our food bank lineups will be getting longer. That makes it all the more essential that COPE’s job creation pro- gram be implemented. j 2 e PACIFIC TRIBUNE, OCTOBER 1, 1986 Electors, made the charge Monday as the seven-member board put the finishing touches to the board’s share of the proposed - four-year capital plan. At the centre of the controversy was a — planned $2.1 million expenditure for 1987 _ to the Stanley Park zoo, part ofa 10-15 year : expansion plan approved by the four com=— missioners belonging to the right-wing Civic” Non-Partisan Association. ee That. plan — which will, if completed, see the free zoo enlarged to a regional z00 charging entrance fees — was enacted at the expense of “people priorities,” Wilson charged. Speaking after some 33 representatives of — various community associations and com- ~ munity centres had urged the board to ~ reverse previous decisions cutting costs for _ necessary repairs or park construction, Wil- - son challenged the NPA majority to put - their Stanley Park expansion plan out tO ~ public meetings. a “You are prepared to put this money into a zoo when you don’t havea public man- date,” she charged. COPE’s Harris said community groups were asking for repairs to park field houses, swimming pools and community centre buildings “because years of neglect under the NPA have created the need for repairs. “My fear is that the public may defeat the entire plebiscite because people don’t want (an expanded) zoo at this time,” said Fogal. A plebiscite asking for voter authoriza- tion to borrow $64 million to facilitate a $144-million, four-year city capital works plan — with some $29 million earmarked — for parks and recreation — will be on the — ballot in the civic election Nov. 15. COPE's urging support for the plan. COPE commissioners. made several amendments to the proposed park board share of the capital plan, urging that more — monies be spent on neighborhood projects and calling for scrapping the proposed Z00 — expansion and other tourist-oriented pro- jects. Most went down to defeat with the four-member NPA majority voting against. Included among the cuts were a planned pier for CRAB park in the Downtown East- side, $50,000 for expansion of the area’s Oppenheimer Park facilities and $50,000 for a variety of projects in neighboring Strath- _ cona. |