’ Only two amendments to Labor Act succeed | ¥ MD is si The old Industrial Conciliation and Arbitration Act, around which labor waged many bitter struggles during the forties, is now as defunct as the Liberal-Conservative Coalition that VICTORIA, B.C. wrote it into the statutes of the province. In its place is the Social Credit government’s new Labor Relations Act which passed into law last week. Even before it came to the floor of the legislature the new act provoked an outcry, or more accurate- ly, outcries against it, for labor’s voice was divided. There were those in the Joint Labor Confer- ence, representing all sections of organized labor except the inde- pendent unions, who argued that* labor should lobby Socred back- benchers for amendments that would fashion the act more to Jabor’s liking. And there . were others, in the leadership of the conference, who demanded nothing less than complete withdrawal of the bill. This, a Liberal-devised manouvre to embarrass the government and leave the implication that the old ICA Act, by comparison, was good legislation, succeeded .only in strengthening the government and preventing labor from getting the amendments it might otherwise have obtained. The move could not have succeeded without the sup- port of the CCF right-wingers hold- ing commanding positions in the unions and its weakness—fatal to labor’s demands—became apparent when the bill was brought before the legislature. The Liberal and CCF right-wing leadership of the Joint Labor Con- ference had made a demand on the government which, if the govern- ment had accepted it, would have been construed by the opposition parties as a defeat of the govern- ment. Social Credit back-benchers lined up solidly with their govern- and defeat amendments which they might have been persuaded to sup- port had it not. been for the pro- vocative stand of the Joint Labor Conference’s leadership. The main fight in the House centred around the controversial sections of the act which would drag striking unions into the Su- preme Court. Under sections 54 and 55, the labor minister could have a Su- preme Court judge decide on the legality of a strike. If he decided it was illegal he could cancel the union’s collective agreements, its checkoff and its certification. CCF members charged that the two new sections were taken over from Alberta which had found them unworkable and _ scrapped them this year. CCF leader Arnold Webster said that they would pass the “death sentence” on unions and leave their members defenseless. The Liberals revealed how phony their professed opposition to the bill was by voting with the government to support ref- erence to a judge. Indeed, George Gregory (Lib., Victoria) tried to toughen up the section by giv- ing the power to an employer to ask for a judge as well as the minister. : The debate on this section was so hot that the government felt it necessary to make a minor conces- ment to preserve its small majority AU aL ULL MILO LOMO Me Mr ne Nan Men amt it ene Mt att tt ALL OUT MAY DAY Canada _Labor’s Rights | sion. An amendment offered by CT i it Ht ait all three. Labor Minister Lyle Wicks made it possible for the judge to impose only one of the penalties instead of The only other government amendment inserted a section simi- lar to that in the ICA Act which forbids prosecutions without con- sent of the Labor Relations Board. This last-minute change of heart came after the Socreds had voted down a similar amendment offered by the CCF. But the act says nothing about the indiscriminate. use of injunc- tions to hog-tie strike action. An amendment to the trade union act offered by Frank Howard (CCF, Skeena) which would have limited their use was turned down by At- torney-General Bonner. CCF spokesmen were bitter in their denunciation of Section 11, which allows craft unions to get certification in large plants where _ industrial unions are already cer- tified. This section removes the board’s power to refuse such ap- plications if they were contrary to trade union practice. “You are trying to make scabs out of the workers of British Col- umbia,” charged Robert Strachan (CCF, Cowichan -Neweastle). He moved an amendment which would have made it impossible to split up industrial units except by ma- jority vote of all the workers in the plant. Strachan said that this section 1 : FOR THEIL SUBIEILE VEU EUEUECUMIEILE Jobs and Peace BROCKTON POINT OVAL (STANLEY PARK) Sunday, May 2 = 2:30 p.m. — Stop the H-Bomb Tests Amend The ‘Police-State’ Sections Of Federal Bill y & Amend the Anti-Labor Sections of Provincial Bill 28 Develop Industry at Home, Trade With All Coun-_ tries and Provide Jobs. Increase ‘Unemployment Insurance Benefits and Extend the Act to Cover All Unemployed. Cars Wanted To Provide Transportation. For Information Phone J. Scott, Secretary at TA. 2029. _ Bumper Cards Available. | : ‘Inserted by: 1954 May Day Committee ‘|volved in LYLE WICKS would enable industrial unions to be broken up, He called it “a disgraceful attempt” to split the trade union movement open by jurisdictional fights, Another feature of the act which drew fire, especially of CCF MLAs who are members of the IWA, was what they called its discrimination against industrial unions. “The act is aimed directly at the IWA,” said Howard. CCF amendments to provide for industry-wide votes on acceptance or rejection of conciliation awards and on strike action, were defeat- ed. Howard argued that it would be “impossible” for the IWA or any other large industrial union to comply with all the requirements of the act. : ; Another unsuccessful amendment by Frank Howard (CCF Skeena) would have removed the fines which now can be imposed on individual trade. unionists. Opposition members were not Satisfied with the Provision defin- ing the right of a worker to join a union of his choice, They con- ceded that the new section had eliminated the obnoxious words “is eligible to” which the Labor Relations Board used in the past to prevent workers from joining the unions they wanted. But they argued that retention of the words “member in good standing” still Save opportunities for the LRB to interpret constitutions, The govy- ernment however, refused to re- move the offending sections. _ The CCF spent a good deal of time trying to return the LRB to its former position of authority. In this it had the support of the Liberals. Premier Bennett flatly refused to consider the demands, arguing that the whole principle of responsible government was in- having the minister in charge of the act. Equally unsuccessful was the amendment which would have brought a single employee under the protection of the act, by re- cognizing him as a bargaining unit. _A source of worry to the opposi- tion were sections in the Act which they claimed could open the way to company unions. Leo Nimsick (CCF, Cranbrook) tried to have the definition of trade union amended to cut out company. unions. An- other CCF amendment would have eliminated collective agreements with uncertified organizations. Rae Eddie (CCF, New West- minster) tried without result to have a section included which would have prevented one union from applying for certification in a plant when the Union holding certification was negotiating or on strike. Zs Tn all, some 40 opposition amend- ments fell beneath the government battering ram as the act passed the committee for its thi final reading. ee ™~ ee ee S. H. BROWN PLUMBING & HEATING 371 Johnson Road R.R.1 White Rock - Phone 5661 PACIFIC TRIBUNE — APRIL 23, 1954 — PAGE 2 East planning On-to-Ottawe jobless trek HAMILTON Plans for an on-to-Ottawa trek this month of jobless workers from Major centres in Ontario and Que- bee were announced here following a meeting of organizations of the unemployed in Hamilton’s Labor Temple. : Present were representatives from Toronto, Hamilton, Niagara Falls, St. Catherines, Port Col- borne and Welland groups. The meeting agreed on a pro gram to get jobs through trade and public works, increased bene- fits for the full period of uner- ployment, medical and dental care for unemployed. A broad steering committee was elected which will contact unemployed organizations in Windsor, Montreal, Sudbury. Brantford and other points. ‘Hoover Days’ return to U.S. SEATTLE “Jobs are getting scarcer every day,” an editorial in The Washing- ton Teamster declares. The official paper of AFL Teai- sters Joint Council 28 says the cur- |rent recession reminds it “of the dismal old days under Herbert Hoover’s regime. . . . “When the great depression was at its worst, Hoover cheered us all up with news that ‘prosperity wes just around the corner.’ But we didn’t turn that corner until we got rid of Hoover. “Now, we are told, President Eisenhower doesn‘t think unem ployment is so bad or that busi- . hess conditions are serious. The ‘corner’ he said we would turf this March has been moved up several months. “Unemployment, says Washin&- ton, is not very bad, except for the nearly 5 million people who are out of work — and their families. But nothing is going to be dope just yet; if they are real patient there may be a handout before Snow falls again.” Slight decreases in unemploy- ment compensation claims, the editorial concluded, are ‘accounted for “because so many jobless meP and women have drawn out their accounts and must look elsewhere: They must either go on relief oF go hungry. For jobs are getting scarcer every day.” Alberta to aid jobless miners CALGARY The government of Alberta will spend $100,000 to help g00 coal miners find new jobs. Four Alberta mines have closed in the Crows Nest Pass district, Brazeau, and at Coal Branch. Problems of market ing coal were held responsible. The grant will try to place miner* in other industries and was auth- orized in a bill placed before tbe legislature. ; PACIFIC ROOFING Company Limited CE. 2733 2509 West Broadway N. Bitz. - 8B. Kostyk : p