Novenber Sth, 1973

: and requested « ‘that the | matter be deferred for further study} however, Aldermen

traboulay and Rang ger reiterated the -connents nade in the Committee’ 8 report,

and menbers of Couned1. | generally agreed ‘that the proposal should not be

approved 3 at ‘this time.

Moved by Alderman Ranger:

Seconded, by Alderman Traboulay:

That as reconmended in a report from the Land: Sale Conmittee, November

ist, 1973, the ‘proposed land exchange of the South 504 | feet of the Remainder

Phoenix Doors
Ltd.re Laurier’
lAve. GVW Load
iLimit z

of Let 1, Flan 1957 for city-owned lots 1-7, inclusive, Plan 1957 and. Lots 8,

9, and 10, Plan 2301, be not approved. Carried.

The city clerk advised that rep resentatives of Phoenix Doors Led. were

in attendance in support of a letter from that firm dated Novenber and, 1973,
“stating that enforcenent of ‘By-law No. 1275 which Aimits the GVW load Limit to

26, 900 Ibs. on Laurier Avenue, will work a serious hardship on its business ©

activities. His Worship the Nayor invited the representatives to. speak, and
Mr. Axtman reiterated the comments made in the letter from his fin.

Moved by Alderman Ranger :

Seconded by Alderman Mabbett:

That the letter from Phoenix Doors Ltd., dated November 2nd, 1973, con-

cerning By-law No. 1275, cited as the "City ef Port Coquitlam Traffic Regu-_

lation By-law, 1971, No. 1117, Awendment By-law, 1973, No. 1275"; be received.
: Carried. .
Alderman Thompson voted against the resolution.
Prior te passage of the foregoing vesolution, Alderman Thompson pointed

out that as definite plans: have been made for relocation to 4 new site by no

later than May Ast, 1974, further consideration should be given to the ren

— quest of Phoenix Doors Ltd. to either repeal or place the By-law in abeyance

until that time; and Alderman Traboulay mentioned that any further Liscussion

- on the subject would place the Council in jeopardy if the firm's solicitor

i cvep re entry of
City & Town of

y Langley into:

a Water District

Langleys, the cost of water per gallon to member municipalities would increase

‘is undertaking to move against the By-law.
CORRESPONDENCE & PETITIONS:

From the Greater Vancouver Regional District, being the Joint Water &

Sewer Committee Minutes dated October 24th, 1973 (copies of which were pre-

viously distributed to council for study) concerning ‘the proposed extension

of water service to the City and the Township of Langley.

Alderman Laking stated that if water service is extended to the two -

to double the amount of the | Present rate, and that previously, any new member

_ had to pay a cash amount to the District for installation « Or the required

trunks, ete.: however, the Commissioner has advised that the t two Langleys