MibyrigLOHN WEIR he Staff Correspondent HILE the Goldwaters and heir ilk are howling ties their “brink of war” lu- jp .’ Sther representatives of ep wimess are taking more Stock of the world today © outlook for the future. a Press tycoon Lord Roy lit Gos reseed from the Gi Mion recently profound- Sturbed” that the West he 7 Sufficiently recognize B makin Strides the USSR bom n§ in production, and Hope, Predicted that “the de- ivy —t Of Russian produc- Beane them a formidable thet or for future world Sues: VW, a F. Carey, president of More Chamber of Commerce, atket Concerned with present imi ‘merican “cold. war” hi thewion against trade Haji USSR and other so- ine “ountries, he complains, Fy 4," Uncle Sam’s ‘“‘west- 86 Making enormous te y Ut of that trade, while a €e businessmen find Aan, 8 “in a disadvant- With th Position in comparison “ir competitors”. lay talk ther eq: the «eabitalists are speaking At anguage of dollars”... tion * frst international exhi- llding ©OMStruction and road- t Xa achinery in Moscow, k ate i big East-West tibitor ing made. There are ting §ftom 19 countries, in- "ish 8 British firms, 12 sh, Tt A West German, eg ian, Austrian, Swiss, We) a Merican and others, ialit representatives of the Rs “countries. Canada how- ‘tit gong those absent. slitep €nt her foreign trade q “co, nperts and buyers “tty, oUntries are swarming Le alr grounds. ay, Mes S began the very first pra Be USSR bought a i. the ldge crane for $100,- a ct y 1. goslavs took a at equi, king excavator and 1009 ‘pment to the tune of ie pee from then the ites 9 Oth purchases of the S aa Placement of ord- ith Me brisk. het Be cener nail is being he in . © coffin of the “cold iy ble Orld trade. It is re- nes a at Canada is not i Mle more active and posi- int’sent this regard. Despite a on UPswing in her eco- 4 of ada needs a reorien- os her foreign trade’ if ing Pr OBress. a jtemeomson is right about * Ndous growth of the Reo, : abou Nomy. Mr, Carey is t °Pportunity for pro- SOVIET TRADE: threat or promise for Canada? fit in trade with the socialist countries: the deals being made in Moscow prove this. But there is more to it than that. One-third of the world today is composed of socialist coun- tries with rapidly expanding economies, which means also expanding opportunities for trade, but on a different basis than in previous times. This sec- tor of the world cannot be dic- tated to. Willing as they are to trade, the socialist countries won't buy goods they don’t need; they won't pay exorbitant monopoly prices for what they buy, and they will develop com- mercial relations only on a mu- tual profitable basis, which also means they will buy where they can sell. The countries just emerging from colonial and dependent status also offer a growing market — but also on new terms. They will no longer con- sent to supply cheap foodstuffs and raw materials to the “metropolis” and pay high prices for manufactured goods. They are out to industrialize and modernize their countries. The publicly-owned sector of the economy is becoming ever more dominant in most of these countries, and some: have al- ready taken the road to social- ism. With such powerful highly- developed countries as_ the USSR at their side, they no longer are compelled to do what Washington or London _ tells them. They made this abundant- ly clear at the United Nations conference on trade in Geneva last June. The socialist and newly emerging countries are the bulk of the world’s population. They are rapidly developing. Growing MOSCOW economies and higher living standards offer the greatest op- portunities for trade. In the past decade, for ex- ample, the national income of the USSR increased 2.3 times, and in the same period (1953- 63) the real income of the people rose by 61 percent. High- er wages for a quarter of the working population and pen- sions for farmers in 1964 will up this percentage considerably. This means the 225 million So- viet people are buying that much more — and part of these purchases is in imported goods. In 1963 the volume of Soviet trade amounted to 12,900 mil- lion roubles (16 billion U.S. dollars), which is 12 times what it was in 1938. And it will keep mounting. New pattern If Lord Thomson had studied Soviet exports to the devel- oping countries he would have noticed that what predomi- nates is not manufactured goods (which is the pattern where developed capitalist coun- tries trade with less developed lands), nor armaments (which is one of the special feature of U.S. “aid” to those countries), but machines, including whole factories and power stations. Yes, and the USSR trains en- gineers from those countries to get industrialized and produce their own manufactured goods. The new pattern of world trade coming into being is the international exchange of goods between equals, not economic domination of one country by another. The USSR is doing business with nearly 100 countries, in- Advances in Soviet science offer a brand new sales product: medical and industrial patents. cluding the capitalist ones. And they are buying and selling a large variety of commodities. My press clippings of the last couple of weeks show the fol- lowing deals with non-socialist countries: The Soviet Union has bought hundreds of millions of roubles worth of chemical equipment from Britain, Italy, West Ger- many and France. Its import of coffee is up 350 percent in seven years, natural rubber—150 percent. Denmark and Sweden are building ships for the USSR. The Soviet Union bought a urea plant complete from‘ the Japanese Toya Engineering Co. for $9,000,000. British Courtaulds Ltd. sold 15. million roubles worth of rayon yarn. Joy Co. of Pitts- burgh sold 90 cutterloaders and other equipment. India delivered 188,700 pairs of shoes (on top of double that amount bought earlier). And so on. Among items the USSR has sold or is selling abroad are road building and farm machin- ery to Pakistan for $11,000,000, isotopes to Siemens in West Germany, cinerama equipment to Japan (the Karakuen Co. claims the Soviet article is superior to the American), watches, cam- eras, tinned fish. and vodka to Britain, metal-working lathes to the U.S., passenger cars and trucks to Iceland, Finland, Aus- Western businessmen are finding they can make profitable trade deals in Moscow. tria, Indonesia, Ghana (and “Volga” limousines to Britain), tractors to 51 different coun- tries, hydrofoil ships to Italy, France and other countries, etc. While the USSR is still be- hind the U.S.—and Canada—in many lines, in others it is al- ready ahead and the American businessmen are not averse to buying up Soviet patents for oil drilling and other machinery. At a recent press conference Soviet vice-premier I. Novikov told, among other things, of ad- vances in automation where only one person will now be required to erect a five-storey apartment building. British representatives spent two months in the USSR to buy a new Soviet invention, an arti- ficial limb that obeys the “com- mands of the brain” if attached even to a little stub of the ori- ginal arm. And these are just some of the new inventions. Desire needed U.S. industrialist Edward Lamb, who recently visited the Soviet Union, urged American businessmen to engage in mu- tually advantageous trade with the USSR “before it is too late.” The warning applies doubly to Canada. It is. not true that Canada can’t sell anything to the Soviet Union but wheat, and buy noth- ing at all from her. What is wanted is the desire and ‘a business-like study of commo- dities that can be bought and sold. In the final account what is wanted is concern for Canada’s interests. First of all, East-West trade promotes peace, and peace is our Interest No. 1. Secondly, trade with the socialist coun- triés promotes Canada’s inde- pendence, correcting the present overwhelming reliance on the U.S., which hampers the devel- opment of Canadian economy (under somewhat similar cir- cumstances, the government of Tunisia, for example, has decid- ed to switch orders away from France). Finally, it means turning to- wards that part of the world that is growing and which offers the best prospects for Canada’s trade in the future. Trade with the USSR is not a threat—except to those who want to turn the clock of his- tory backward! It is a promise October 2, 1964—PACIFIC TRIBUNE—Page 5