KARL ZUKER EDWARD LEONG COPE fields strong Parks Board team For Parks Board, the Committee of Progressive Electors (COPE) has fielded a team of active community workers. Donald ‘‘Dusty’’ Greenwell is widely known and respected as a tireless worker for the Hastings Community Centre and Cassiar Ratepayers Association in Vancouver’s east end. Edward ‘‘Ed’’ Leong, though still a young man, has put much time and effort as a member of the Point Grey Community Association into the fight to ob- tain the concrete Jericho hangars as a community centre for the neighborhood. Sid Shelton is well-known in Grandview for his work in the old Grandview Ratepayers Association and the Commu- nity Centre Association, of which he is currently president. Karl Zuker has won a sterling reputation by his work for the Cassiar Ratepayers Associa- tion in the fight for new Brighton Park and against the Charles Street freeway. These four, by their grass roots participation in civic betterment, demonstrate their willingness to continue the tough plodding work that is en- tailed in improving this great city. Recognizing the degenerating economic situation, members of COPE have given these candi- dates a program with the accent on wage payments to publicize © and fight for reinstitution of the Winter Works Program and completion of the Stanley Park seawall, both with federal financing. _More community centres and improvement of. the older cen- tres are other items in the plat- form that will put men and wo- men back to work in the near fu ture. ‘Tie rent increases fo rise in cost of living’ DOROTHY LYNAS, popular North Vancouver District school trustee, who is completing -her 12th year on school board, -announced she is a candidate for re-election on Dec. 12 S PACIFIC TRIBUNE_=FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 27, 1970—PAGE 2 ESOKI—-ONEF KE AIIMIVOH YAGIEA— IMUTIAT DAIAY — Yorke Bruce Yorke, aldermanic candidate for COPE and one of the original organizers of the Tenants Council in Vancouver, said last week that elected COPE aldermen would enact a city bylaw to prevent exhorbi- tant rent increases. He said they would move to add to the regulations of the Van- couver Grievance Board bylaw a section that would require any proposed rent incrase be not more than the percentage increase in the Vancouver cost- of-living index in the previous 12 month period. ‘“‘Under the provincial Landlord and Tenant Act rents can only be increased once in a year, but at present there is no limitation on the amount of the increase,’’ Yorke said at an election meeting in Roberts School. .: eye? paAniisatc ete Cf % Kem yOl t &i PIUNLSIO ar I Turn out to vote You can change city council Dec. 9 By ALD. HARRY RANKIN The turn out of voters in Van- couver civic elections is low. More than half of eligible voters do not go to the polls. In 1968 only 44 percent of voters exercised their franchise. Why is it that so many people don’t bother to vote? It isn’t that: they’re satisfied with things as they are. Most people have complaints about how the city is run and also some ideas about what should be done. But it seems that many have a ‘‘what’s the use’’ feeling about voting. They’re not convinced that their vote can or will change anything. i Nothing could be further from the truth. City Council makes important decisions every week affecting the lives and welfare of Van- couver citizens. The kind of decisions it makes depend upon who is on Council and who is exerting the most pressure on Council. The trouble with the decisions Council makes today is that they tend to favor only a small segment of the citizens— special interests such as promoters, real estate firms, big corporations. The needs of the ordinary citizen are ignored. But it needn’t remain that way. Homeowners and small businesses pay excessive taxes today and they go up every year. That’s because big commercial and industrial properties in most cases are assessed at only a fraction of their real value and also because their assessments in most cases haven’t gone up for 10 years. Council has gone along with this practice. This situation can be changed and homeowners can change it. After all, they comprise almost half the voting population while big business interests number only a handful. Homeowners and small businessmen can have their taxes reduced if they will turn out to vote and give their support to candidates pledged to compel big business to pay its fair share of taxes. Or take the housing shortage and high rents. City Council could quickly change this situation too if it wished. Under the National Housing Act, Council could build 2500 low rental housing units annually at no cost of the city. (The entire cost would be borne by the federal and provincial govern- ments on a 72-25 basis). Furthermore, rents in these units could be kept down to $50 to $100 a month. Also Council could enact by-laws limiting rent increases. Then why isn’t this done? The answer again is that Council is dominated by real estate interests who want the housing shortage to continue. Even our millionaire mayor has his money invested in /apart ments. Tenants now comprise over 54 percent of Vancouver voters. If they turn out to vote and if they vote for candidates pledged to do something about the housing shortage and rents, they could decisively change the compo- sition of Council. Or take the undeniable fact that the East End is the neglected area of our city. This where wechaveithe:greatest : BOI09T SOE DASIeL Fano housing shortage, the highest rents, the slums, the least parks, the most poorly equipped schools and so on. : This isn’t unrelated to the fact that (a) only one parks board member lives in the east end, (b) no school board members live there and (c) I am the only alderman who lives in the East End. ; The situation could be changed if East End voters would go to the polls and vote for candidates who are pledged to the ward system (which would guarantee representation to each area of See RANKIN, pg. 11 M’ only source of ‘information’ in this summary is the local commercial press, so if we have erred in our conclusions, the reader will know who to blame. But for once I think the daily blahs were right. The event was the doings of the Social Credit provincial convention, held over a week ago in the Bayshore Inn in Vancouver. Scanning a list of the ‘‘resolutions’’ coming up for debate, one couldn’t avoid the impression that here was surely a flashback to the witch hunt sessions of the “godfearing”’ fathers of Salem, Massachusetts during the years 1691-92, when some 32 unfortunate women were burned at the stake for alleged ‘‘witch craft,’’ that and other more horrible medieval forms of “‘punishment”’ by death. ' It is also of interest to note that not until the year 1957 was this Massachusetts statute providing for the ‘‘purging of devils” from Massachusetts femininity annuled. We suspect that Socredia in convention in the year 1970 would have rejected annulment — for “security? reasons, since these Socred ‘“‘holy men’’ are whizbangs on and for security. Generally however, it would appear that this aggregation of ‘‘pious”’ politicians and their Socred followers invoked their occult powers of damnation upon everything and everybody who doesn’t conform to the Socred version of the ‘“‘Sermon on the Mount.” All strikes and strikers should be outlawed and tossed into outer darkness. All hippie and non-hippie ‘‘deadbeats, bums, etc., etc,’ should be shorn of their hirsute locks and also cast out to find the non-existent job. The very mention of revolution and revolutionaries raised the heat of the delegate body to Hell fire temperature, hot and sizzling. Reading between the lines so to speak, one could almost sense the smell of hair burning from this Massa —er, B.C. Socred ‘‘holier-than-thou’’ bull session. : Naturally the “‘prosperity” accruing to Beautiful British Columbia from massive giveaways to big U.S. and home- spawned monopolies, were likened to “manna from heaven” (a Socred heaven that is), into which the unbeliever was cajoled or enticed to enter—or stay damned for evermore for his or her unbelieving. ; And that old sinner John Barleycorn came in for a lot of unrewarding and unkind remarks, despite the fact that the B.C. Liquor Control Board (LCB), a lucrative Socred government monopoly, derives an enormous profit from slaking the gullets of dry British Columbians to the tune of $90 million net or over annually. The highlight of the affair, you guessed it, as the press headline said, the ‘‘Cheering Socreds thump for Bibles.” With their High Priest claiming a direct hotline ‘‘plug-in with God,” especially during election time, what else could you expect? But this Socred “‘religion’’ is unique, since it is held to be a real “answer”? to Communism. So, let’s get back to the ‘‘old-time religion’ with Bible reading, the Ten Commandments and sundry other scriptural teachings in school so as to consolidate our young British Columbians against the ‘‘spectre of. Communism,”’ a la Bennett version. It may be noted en passant, that the Socred hierarchy who constitute the government of B.C., and have for the past 18% years, consistently blown holes in two of the ten commandments almost every waking hour. - “Thous shalt not kill’, but WAC and his cohorts give wholehearted approval, and publicly too, to U.S. aggression and genocide in Vietnam and latterly in Cambodia. And “Thou shalt not steal’’, but on behalf of Big Business monopoly, WAC and his Socred cohorts have literally stolen one half or more of B.C. and given it to these lumber, coal, gas, oil and similar tycoons. f It would therefore seem that a little bible reading, interspersed with some elementary studies in honesty and the ethics of fair dealing, would not come amiss in Socred circles, and especially in the inner circles of the Holy of Holies itself. It wouldn’t do much for Communism one way or another, but it might take some of the ‘‘hallelujah’’ out of these witch hunters and help them see themselves as their neighbors see them. It might also enlighten them that the age of the witch hunter has passed. - ts be ors: 2838: 6 bhangive L €e Plus Jou “ST yi 91a 2JSnWwe iii Heow. cilil SIRSY. 96595 ot aa