GORDON REPORT-1 What’s needed to make it rea By LESLIE MORRIS How well will Canadians be living in 1980? Shall we see a two-thirds in- crease in the living standards of 11 million more people than live in Canada today, while they work a little over 30 hours a week in industry and just over 40 on the farm? That is the striking forecast of the Gordon sxe Commission — the royal com- mission on ec- onomic._p ros- pects set up by the St. Laurent government i 1955. ary report which is of the deepest interest to most Can- adians, seeing that eight out of ten of them depend on wages or farming — not on profits — for their livelihood. There is no doubt that a constant rise in living stan- dards is what Canadians want more than anything else. And they realize that only in a world at peace can this be achieved. Every family of working people worries about the fu- ture. They have been doing a great deal about it, in the past 10 years especially. In an expanding capitalist economy, more workers are in unions and more farmers in associations than ever before. Workers join the union to get more pay and shorter hours. The farmer gets together to get better prices for his pro- duct. : The Gordon report will sharpen the determination of the workers and farmers to get a bigger share of the na- tional income. They know from experience that it is one thing for a group of experts to say what is pos- sible, but someihing else again for the workers and farmers to win a better life. They know that better conditions were won in struggle, not given to them on:a silver platter. The very day the Gordon Commission reported, CPR iiremen were on strike against the effects of automation on their jobs. This was perhaps the most important strike since the Oshawa GM strike of 1936 which opened up the mass pro- duction industries to the CIC. The firemen fought the first major strike on the automation issue in Canadian history. The issue was: must technical pro- gress throw men out of their jobs? The firemen have won— temporarily. In October, the fat will be in the fire again. 1951 Vencouvee 844,900 (66%) Surneby $0,400 (1L2%) nd Ric os. Oquitiam 20 (3.09, Port Mood: Total 20,900 > ¢ What will the population of the Greater Vancouver area be in the year 2,000? At the anticipated rate of increase, it will be 1,413,000 as 14,400 (2.8%) 14,000 (2.7 %) 15,700 (3.0%) Por? Coquitiam $,200 (0.6%) 2,200 (0.9%) = Unorganized Areo_ #300 (0.0%) While the Gordon report paints a picture of what can be done, the working people and farmers will ask: How to do it? Granted the royal commis- sion is not a political body in the sense that it can make government decisions, the con- clusions the commission came to are central matters for Can- adian poiitics, especially in this federal election year, Already Liberal and Con- Servative MPs are quoted as asking: What’s in this for us? How. can we use it for votes in June? But the future is not a political football for work- ing people. It is of deep con- cern to their. vital interests and should stimulate greater in- terest in labor-farmer politi- cal action. A number of vital questions come to mind even from press accounts and before making a study of the commission’s re- port ($2 from the Queen’s Printer, Ottawa). For instance, Gordon says that the report is based on two assumptions: -© That there will be no global ~ atomic war. ® That there will be no big depression like in the 1930's. Prety big assumptions! The submissions to the Gor- don Commission proved that compared to 520,900 in 1951. Of this Vancouver proper will have an estimated 563,000, but its percentage of the total will drop from 66 percent Burnaby 267,000 (18.9%) Vancouver 963,000 (39.9%) Canadian labor and the people generally want peace and na- ‘tional policies to develop Can- ada. But the monopolists and the St. Laurent government do not follow policies that match the people’s desires and hopes. Let’s take the possibility of global atomic war as it relates t the present government. - xt xt Le The foreign policy of the St. Laurent government is not based upon the will to avert global atomic war. This coun- try, since 1947, has been fol- lowing in the main, a policy of going along with U.S. Sec- retary of State, John Foster Dulles — of hovering on the “brink” of war. To mention only a few “brink” activities: Korea and the attempt to invade People’s China; the rearmament of West Germany for anti-Soviet mili- tary purposes; the NATO al- liance; and the Middle East, where, despite the govern- ment’s opposition to the Bri- tish-French invasion of Egypt it essentially supports colon- ialism and opposed national liberation movements. Add this to the fact that since 1947 almost half of the government’s annual budget has gone to armaments. Even the most vocal support- er of the St. Laurent govern- ment could hardly claim with Tomorrow 2000 Richmond 146,000 (4.1%) 100,000 (7.5%) & = reason that present Canal policy is actively in sup of world peace or is bas the peaceful coexistence & socialist and capitalist 5¥ —the essence of avé atomic war. : Yet the Gordon Com sion bases its forecast world peace, To make! forecast come true requ! a new foreign policy for ada. Take the matter of am! onomic depression. Thelé a great deal of ar about this especially aM the CCF and Communists? in the labor and farmer md ments. | It is true that Canadians cluding enthusiastic sup? ers of capitalism.as well a) Communists, did not economy here to: expand # did after the war, and mistakes of judgement made. fi But again, you would very few capitalists wh - a frankly truthful mood, W? tell you that they expel! non-depression future, few, if any CCF and Cont! nist people. As for the a unionists and farmers, th is a deep-lying suspi among them, based on © ience, that capitalist freé. terprise has not “abolt Continued on next page Coquitlam North Von.(dist.) @5,000 (6.0%) Pt.Co uitlom €5,000 (4.6%) Total in 1951 to 39.9 percent. The largest population 4 crease will be in Burnaby — from 58,400 in 197 to an estimated 267,000 in 2,000 — and Coquitl® —from 15,700 in 1951 to 100,000 in 2,000. JANUARY 25, 1957 — PACIFIC TRIBUNE—PAG? 1,413,000 Port Moody — 7,500 (0.5%) | r ' iw al