CART ala hi ALE OIE. A EET eetue of Alcan dispute Work in the world’s longest tunnel, from Tahtsa Lake to Kemano, came to a halt two weeks ago when miners walked out after the AFI. Hodcarriers Union signed a backdoor agreement with Alcan officials setting miners’ wages at $1.75 an hour. When “replacements” rushed in by the Hod- carriers Union refused to touch the job until a decent wage agreement was arrived at, union officials hurried north to try and settle the dispute. unica is supporting their just demands for higher wages. Many of the miners are members of Mine-Mill, and that (See story on back page), BUT NO SOCIAL CREDIT ‘BASIC DIVIDEND‘ Alberta prosperous province- for the giant oil monopolies By TOM McEWEN To an outsider travelling in Alberta, evidences of an oil boom are plentiful. Oil derricks now dot the skyline ina near-equality with grain elevators. On rail- way Sidings and vacant lots mil- lions of feet of oil piping of all sizes is stacked up like cordwood. In Edmonton and Calgary the huge administrative buildings of ‘the oil] monopolies are springing up with the speed of ‘the old ‘boom-town shacks. ; On the surface there is an air of prosperity (the real thing is in the coffers of ‘the big Yankee oil trusts) and in hotel lobbies and restaurants, wherever the “hope - to -strike-it-rich-next-year” : fraternity gather there is pay, of speculating about -develop- ments. : 2 The Social Credit government of Premier Manning is riding the ‘oil boom, strong in its belief that not only has it succeeded in per- suading American capital to de- velop (‘‘loot” would ‘be a better word) Alberta's oil resources ‘but that through some mysterious Social Credit alchemy it is itself responsible for the oil being there in the first place. . True, the royalties returned to the province from the exploita- tion by the oil monopolies of this fabulous wealth have enabled the government to provide some extension of services and social ‘benefits to the people. Most*citi- zens, however, are aware that they are not getting anything like the schools, hospitals and other services they might if the oil monopolies weren’t pocketing the lion’s share of ‘the proceeds —as they are. A few Albertans have made.a little money out of the oil boom. The majority are no closer to realizing the oft-proclaimed but never instituted Social Credit “basic dividend” of social security than they were when the late Premier Aberhart was wrapping his theology with Social Credit seript. Alberta is indeed prosperous, as every Social Crediter insists. but ]- much depends on the side of the tracks from which you view this prosperity. The picture varies giles stat a TE OU, RGIS LE EIS SOM TTC rank = file still demanding 10-cent increase By MEL CORBY TORONTO The 19-day strike of 4,768 transit employees of the Toronto Transportation Commission (TTC) ended January 22, with the union leadership capitulating to Bay Street pressure and giving up most of the important issues the‘men had fought for. But rank- and file TTC workers told me after the settlement was announced: “As fas as the en are concerned, we’ re still demanding our $1.55— 10 cents more.” Continuous: meetings in the of- fice of Ontario Labor Minister Charles Daley, during which the leadership of the AFL Street Railway Union bowed before the heavy Tory pressure to call off the strike and put thé issue to} arbitration, resulted in the fol- lowing agreement: i The ‘strikers to return to work with a five-cent wage ‘increase retroactive to Octo- ber 1, to bring the baserate to .$1.45; ‘the additional 10 cents the union demanded to be decided by a Single arbi- trator appointed iby Daley. The TIC wanted a _ three- man board. Any increase over the $1.45 figure will also be retroac- tive to October 1, 1951, and the new contract is to run until October 1, 1952, mean- ing that negotiations for the 1953 contract will begin in August of this year. : On the basis of the five-cent increase the strikers will re- ceive a minimum of $35 in retroactive pay, more if the arbitrator increases the wage boost. A second point yielded to ar- '‘pitration is the formula for a cost-of-living bonus. Under the old agreement it was one cent an hour for every 1.3 jump in the index. The ar- bitrator will decide if this is to be increased. The pres- ent 10-cent COL bonus is in- corporated nt the new base rate. On the issue af tae demands the union won four concessions. J Six hundred extra men are _ guaranteed 80 hours’ pay for Ywo weeks instead of 70 hours. Maintenance workers will be paid for six instead of four 2 statutory holidays, with dou-. © ble time if worked. A $200 increase was granted pensioners between the ages of 65 and 70. : Workers in certain of the car houses and TTC shops will receive the top ra'te for their particular job regardless of seniority if they show they can perform the task satis- factorily. Interest keen in report on USSR Is there any unemployment in the Soviet Union? How are old age pensioners treated? What about living. standards? Do trade unions operate as they do in Canada?) Have women won full equality since the revolution? Do the Soviet people want peace? These questions are among those asked by trade unionists of Pear] Wedro, Fur and Leather Workers Union member, who vis- ited the Soviet Union last fall as a member of a Canadian trade union delegation. Recently Miss Wedro spoke to 300 members of Local 502, Inter- national Longshoremen. and Warehousemen’s Union, at the Legion Hall, New Westminster. Following her report she was plied with questions for more than an hour, primarily on sub- jects relating to social security —employment, medical and den- tal care, pensions and compen- sation. : Trade unions, organizations or house gatherings wishing to hear — Miss Wedro’s first-hand account — of what she saw and heard on her trip to the Soviet Union can contact ‘ther at 2345 West Second © Avenue, BA 1990. Union trend today toward TORONTO There is a growing tendency in the trade union movement to demand that cost-of-living ad- justments or escalators be in- cluded in their contracts. Very few contracts are being’ signed these days without such clauses. What is the reason for this attitude? Recent experience has taught the workers that in the present period of’ armament- created inflation what they gain today in ithe way of wage in- creases is immediately lost to- - Morrow because of continual price rises. \ The ee understand also that they are in no ‘position real- istically to demand the reopen- ing of the contract’ every other day or even every other month. It is true that some unions have ‘been able to get wage openers included in their agreements pro- viding they accept a two-year contract, while a few have them in one-year contracts. But even é ! a here they have to wait six months or a year before being able to negotiate. In the meantime prices rise while real wages and | purchasing power decline. Clearly then with armaments- created inflation continuing in the future, workers are favor- ably inclined to cost-of-living ad- Justments or escalators being in- cluded in contract negotiations. They are correct, too, because to- day it is one of the important means, although not the only one, of ensuring that the burden of armament costs is not placed on the shoulders of the working | class. A second ‘tendency is the fight workers are putting up to have escalators incorporated in their base rate. The Toronto gas workers are a case in point. They finallv . forced the Consumers Gas Company to incorporate the cost-of-living adjustments, amounting to 25% cents, into their base rate. : Workers are making sure that union escalators will not become a two- way street, to be taken away from them when and if prices drop. This fight on their part, which is becoming general, re- flects ‘their efforts to protect themselves in face of an eco- nomic crisis. A third feature in most nego- tiations is the fact that workers are not prepared to accept cost- of-living adjustments or escala- tors as substitutes for wage in- creases. They are opposed to a wage freeze no matter how it ‘is doctored up. Employers would like them to accept such a formula and. so would a number of right-wing bureaucrats. | However, the majority of workers have rejected and. continue to reject such a formula. The direction ‘they are taking is towards in- creasing ‘their base rate and raising their living standards. ~ "That is the essence of the fight of the TTC employees. It was |‘the same in the fight of the To- ronto gas workers when they re- Ss wage éscaintors jected the conciliation board re- port which merely proposed that part of the cost-of-livihg bonus be incorporated in their base rate. A fourth feature of negotia- tions is the fact that workers continue to reject long-term con- tracts. The only group of work- ers stuck with such long-term contracts are the ‘General Mo- tors auto workers in ‘this coun- try. Thus all the evidence available shows that the Reuther formula, | which establishes the principle that workers cannot and should not improve their living stand- ards in a period of war economy, finds very little support in the Canadian trade union*movement. fe Valdes The left wing in the trade union movement is duty bound to take note of these strivings on the part of workers and adopt a positive attitude towards these developments. In the present period of armament-created in- flation it should actively fight for the inclusion of cost-of-liv-_ ing adjustments or escalators in contracts provided they are not substitutes for wage increases and as long as they are not tied to long-term contracts. = Two things should be borne in mind. One is the need to _ fight for one-way escalators that — can be incorporated in the base rate on a monthly basis. The other is the need. to force changes in the government’s cost- of-living index which does not reflect a true picture of the cost of living in Canada. The International Union of Mine, Mill and Smelter Workers — and the United Electrical Work- _ ers are to be commended for the fine job done in, exposing the present government index. The booklet prepared by them should — be in the hands of every local in | Canada and should serve as a hasis for widespread pressure on government , to bring about — changes in the index. ei PACIFIC TRIBUNE — FEBRUARY 1, 1952 — PAGE 3