aman naman ne Yank investors covet our natural wealth - they'll even let us have small share! See Canada as promised (to (st | FOR One Barone a. tapypecuananye ARCTic CIRCLE» | Poa “BUSH” TROVE OF OIL AND MIN MOST. OF-14. MILLION CANADIANS LIVE N NARROW BELT ABOVE U. S. BORDER.) CTORIA ! BUT INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT 15 CRE-| ATING HOST OF NEW NORTHERN: TOWNS) TH EQ WEST] TERRITORIES COVERING NORTH CANADA IS BARRIER TO AGRI- CULTURE BUT A TREASURE RALS NEW. IRON ORE LODE IS LARGER THAN THE STATE os ‘ : OF CONNECTICUT se ji YORK FACTORY Alsackarcusmanl 1 4 tl 7.08 4 {To BUIL sT. TAW- OS mealies, & RENCE SEAWAY WITH U. $., IF POSSIBLE; ; ON TA R I 0 ALONE, IF NECESSARY, te nl PS PEG bi ARE EACH OTHER'S in f U | |ABEST CUSTOMERS f | i i It makes a pleasant picture - bnt not for Canadians “Is Canada the Promised Land?” asks a brochure published by the U.S, investment firm of Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner and Beane, This resources map prepared in the United States and published by many Canadian newspapers poses the same ques- tion and arrives at the same anwer. ATIONAL’ PRODUCTION HAS QUADRUPLED | N SINCE 1939; CANADIAN DOLLAR IS AT PAR}} OR BETTER WITH_THE U.S. DOLLAR. E Canada IS the promised land — promised to U.S. monopoly big business by those Cana- dian big business interests and their governments now giving away the inalienable rights of the Canadian people. Alberta LPP charges Socred gov't has handed oil wealth to U.S. monopolies EDMONTON In its election message to Alberta’s people the Labor-Progressive party reminds them that 17 years ago two Social Credit leaders were sent to Fort Saskatchewan jail for putting out a leaflet titled “‘Bankers’ Toadies.” In contrast today, the Manning-Tanner Social Credit government has let U.S. monopolies own or control Alberta’s great oil and gas resources. “The truth is only too clear, Manning and Tanner have deliberately sold our rich natural resources of all oil and gas to U.S. interests for a song,” the LPP} declares, In its call for people’s unity at the polls on August 5. the LPP urges voters to put an end. to “this foreign domination.” and outlines a program of public ownership of Alberta oil and gas ‘on the principle that their use will bring lasting prosperity and peace to our people.” The LPP’s six-point election platform demands a tax of 25 cents on every barrel of crude oil taken from Alberta wells, ‘ to be devoted to the {people’s health and welfare. It also de- mands a ban on export of nat- ural gas until a 50-year reserve for Alberta is proven, and that then gas exports can only be permitted to other Canadian provinces, The call also detalls a plan for the building of publicly-owned in- dustries to process the by-pro- ducts. of natural gas, including many now being imported at high prices from the U.S.; and cheap fertilizers for agriculture. No U.S. coal should be imported into Canada so long as Alberta mines and miners are idle, the plaform declares. It also calls for a new Alberta labor act to guarantee the workers’ rights; wheat crop; for a big program of rura] electrification and loans at low interests to the farmers. - It®proposes a complete revision of Alberta’s tax structure to aid the municipalities and develop so- cial services. It demands a new deal for the youth free from the threat of war and joblessness. Finally it details a plank for an Alberta code of civil liberties and for revision of the electoral sys- tem to provide representation by population. cooperating wholeheartedly with Ottawa and Washington in mak- ing Alberta a war base for U.S. imperialism,” the LPP states. “In addition to economic penetration (Alberta resources forgU.S. war preparations) and political con- trol, there is what amounts to virtual military occupation. “At Suffield, Alberta, there is a giant experimental station for germ and chemical warfare, with Canadian, British and American scientists at work. The Edmon- rton airport is regularly used by U.S. military aircraft. U.S. troops are a common sight on Edmonton streets. U.S. army ‘formations have used Alberta soil for practice Manoeuvres. The Alaska High- way is first and foremost a mili- for $2.25 a bushel for the coming tary highway afd is extensively “The Manning government is, used as such by the U.S, war. de- partment,” the LPP asserts. Warning that the Alberta Lib- eral party is putting on a well- financed campaign to capitalize on the, dissatisfaction with the Manning government, the LPP appeals to all Alberta voters, es- pecially to CCF and Social Credit supporters who want peace and progress, to unite to achieve pro- gress at the polls. “Unity of LPP, ©CF and re- form-minded Social Credit voters can ensure that the Liberal op- position will be replaced by a genuine people’s opposition. Make your vote count for unity and progress,” it states. Pointing out that “the Manning government deserves to be defeat- ed. It could be if a broad united front people’s movement had been built embracing the OCF, LPP and reform-minded Social Credit people now parting ways with Manning,” the LPP sharply criti- cizes CCF right-wing leader Elmer Roper. It declares: “The stand of Roper and other right-wing leaders of the Alberta CCF, a stand in support of the war program of the Lib- eral government at Ottawa, a stand against any form of co- operation among progressive EF “MSE groups has prevented the for- mation of this kindof political united front.” Striving to achieve unity of pro- gressive voters in each constitu- ency behind one progressive can- didate, the LP/P is nominating in a limited number of riding, sup- porting non-partisan labor and farmer candidates who take a stand for unity, peace and peo- ple’s welfare. The LPP has also declared’ its readiness to support CCF candidates who take a public stand for peace by négotiation be- tween the five great powers, Can- adian independence and péeople’s welfare. Tanner heads oil company EDMONTON Nathan FE, Tanner, minister of mines in Premier EB, C, Manning’s Social Credit government which, it is charged. has enabled U.S. monopoly interests to obtain con- trol of Alberta’s rich oil industry. will become president and mang- ing director of Merrill Petroleums Ltd. on his retirement next month. Appropriately enough, Merrill Petroleums is closely linked with the U.S. investment firm of Mer- ril Lynch Pierce, Fenner and Beane. (See also John Stewart’s report from Toronto on this page: PACIFIC TRIBUNE — JULY 25, 1952 — PAGE 2 SA) By JOHN STEWART TORONTO It’s a beautiful brochure. The front cover bears the heading “Canadian Investments” and 18 decorated with a big red maple leaf on, which are thumbnail illus trations of Canadian waterpowel: petroleum, agriculture, lumber and mining. / Across the bottom appears the sponsors’ name: Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner and Beane, Turn the cover and there is a map of Canada bearing the 10g scription: “‘Is Canada the Proms: ed Land?” The rest of the booklet dis cusses “Canada’s Potential” fof the benefit of the U.S. investors: And by the time you’ve finished, there’s little doubt about the answer to the question .on thé opening page: Canada IS the promised land and it’s been prom ised to the USA. Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fenner and Beane are investment brok- ers. They are among the piggest in the U.S. and have recently moved into Canada to get in 02 the “boom” which is bripgidé close to a billion U.S. dollars # year into buying up Canada One sound reason for further investment, the booklet tells it readers, it the lack of public ownership in Ganada. One bis reason for this, it frankly declare® “ds the large stake American bus! ness has in Canada’s industrial development.” But Merrill Lynch Pierce, Fe? ner and Beane is nothing if 2° charitable, “Of course Canadian investor® can participate to some extent 1? jthe growth of Canada by purchas- ing stock in the American-ow2? parent companies operating plants or subsidiaries in the Dominion. But it does not go on to explai2 that this is our Achilles heel— that riding this kind of “boo? trail” will lead us to the bust sure as God made little apples. How generous! The booklet goes on to recount What most people know too wél ——Canadian dependence upon the — U.S. market. Witness a gloomy Canadia? | Press despatch from Vancouvéel July 8 headed “Two Outlets Left for B.C. Lumber.” Lumber coon H. R. MaeMillan is quoted’ “The once big China market ha disappeared.”” The only markets left in the world were the U-5 and Canada—and the U.S., Mat Millan declared, “is an up2Dd down country.’’ : Then there is the Associated Press from Washington, July 1a: “The CIO said today a U.S. 62 nomic recession is likely in 1953 and 1954.” Need we be reminded that 1953 is only six months off? If we’v® begunjto have market problems al- ready what’s in store for us wie? the U.S. shuts the door in ov? face? In the next few weeks, the three big Canadian trade uni0? bodies, representing more that ® million ‘organized workers, will meet in conventions, One of th? basic principles of trade unionis™ —job protection—would seem to demand of the unions participat ing that they press for unity of 2! unions—CCL, TLC, Catholic Independent—to bring their cO?” siderable pressure to bear on the government at Ottawa to tat’ some of our trade eggs out of te U.S. basket and put them in othe baskets where there are also Dié markets — the British Commo? wealth, China, the People’s Bes mocracies, the USSR. 4