Unity without uniformity — Rancourt By MEL DOIG The election of Gerard Ran- Gist &€neral secretary of the ebec Federation of Labor, to BS of the two executive vice- L Sidencies of the Canadian cli Or Congress was the dramatic Hore of the Seventh Constitu- nal Convention of the CLC he wtting on the last morning of at ve-day Convention, it was the 2°°. a victory for unity of : Entire labor movement in alta and an important ad- Rams Of the Quebec trade union- resolute: struggle for au- ey: “Tt makes possible,” © Rancourt, “unity without Niformity.» a their printed call to the aneention delegates to elect Co eourt,, the QFL . Executive all pmittee speaking for almost wy the Quebec delegates, stated, labo, Wish to help build a united a th Movement in Canada rath- inter an See it torn down by ¢ nal rivalries and disagree- im S. This requires that a full- ie © Officer of the CLC be really Presentative of Quebec.” © Convention delegates re- cloned by giving 887 votes to defe Rancourt and only. 522 to of «t Romeo Mathieu, choice he CLC establishment’s court Of the 887 votes for Ran- Que; Some 200-odd were from the ®c, while the balance of unit Otes that spelled victory for ino 4. Were from English-speak- & Canada. dey Peaking later at the Quebec Lape tion’s celebration, Louis and ie » President of the QFL fader of its delegation, told tj the Tribune, “What is important is that the majority of the dele- gates — not only those from Quebec — wished Quebec to be represented at the summit of the CLC by a man who truly repre- sents the trade union movement of Quebec. Mathieu did not represent us. He was the choice of the CLC. Our caucus and our Council had chosen Rancourt. We said so and repeated it; and we have obtained the under- standing of the other delegates. C’est magnifique!” Interviewed immediately after the morning elections, Louis La- berge commented, “There can be no doubt the election of Rancourt goes a long way to reduce the strained relationship between the QFL and the CLC which came to a critical point the other night.” (Mr. Laberge was referring to the Conven- . tion’s rejection of the Rancourt Minority Report concerning CLC structure and proposals for in- creased responsibilities and au- thority for provincial federations. This rejection had been railroad- ed through in a bureaucratic, undemocratic manner by the chairman, President Donald Mac- Donald. “His election,” continued La- berge, “means that the voice of the QFL will now be clearly heard in the CLC. This will enormously help in furthering unity between the trade union- ists of all Canada.” Asked what are the intentions now of the QFL concerning its demands for greater autonomy within the CLC, Mr. Laberge replied, “We will continue to fight for these rights until we have won them.” Throughout this historic labor convention, occurring during the federal election, no specific men- tion was made of the crisis that now involves Canada’s contin- ued existence—no word was spoken of the Canada of two nations, of the need to recognize their equality with full rights to self-determination, in a new kind of federation of equals, Questioned by the Tribune about what had been spoken, off the floor of the Convention, about the “two-nation thesis of the QFL”, Fernand Daoust, one of its vice-presidents, replied, “The thesis of the QFL — that Canada is composed of two na- tions — has not been explicitly invoked during this Convention. It has, however, been implied. It was at the very heart of the three main problems or ques- tions which directly confronted the QFL kere. The first, the mat- ter of the pact to be further discussed with the Confederation of National Trade Unions and the Corporation of Teachers of Quebec, was resolved in the compromise agreement for the QFL-CLC joint discussions with them. This compromise we con- sider as recognition, within the framework of the trade union movement, of the status of equality between the two na- tions. Therefore, we think the compromise agreement is a po- sitive step forward. The second main question,” continued Mr, Daoust, “was the division of re- sponsibilities between the QFL and the CLC and the Minority Report submitted by Rancourt concerning this. “Here also the national ques- tion was involved. Our position was voted down, but we were not defeated. The voting for executive vice-presidents was the final test, and here the elec- tion of Gerard Rancourt to one of the four main positions of leadership in the CLC represent- ed a resounding victory. He was the choice of Quebec’s delega- tion and as such was presented as a direct challenge to the CLC establishment, which had previ- ously repulsed all our efforts to win a distinct role in the CLC for Quebec.” Fernand Daoust concluded PHOTO—JACK PHILLIPS with enthusiasm, “We from Quebec are very happy about the way the Convention dele- gates reacted in this election of Rancourt. It can be said that it was the delegates from English- speaking Canada who elected the Quebec candidate. And this proved to us that the Convention delegates are less conservative and more ready to accept the challenge of the new than was the established leadership of the CEG? Trade-unionists and other de- mocratic forces in Quebec will also draw Strength from the fact this great Convention of the CLC declared itself for unity through- out Canada’s labor movement. ac delegates advance unity - toate election of Gerard Ran- Stro,’ “2Vorite son of the 200 of 4, Quebec delegation, as one ; two executive vice-presi- Cones! the Canadian Labor gine SS: has to be assessed as Sol; dauificant victory for labor fonty in Canada. 524 : flection by 884 votes to ’dmini Romeo Mathieu, the &d 4, stration’s nominee, attest- by ¢ the understanding, gained dutine Majority of the delegates tion € course of the conven- Prengy nat Solidarity between Worke and English speaking Unity S is the key to all-in labor Thi M this country. aks urge for unity in the ne + OF labor was the dominat- Vas eee of the convention. It erg op -cted in the large num- abor resolutions from locals, vag thouncils and federations. It Ort... Major theme of the Re- ing Constitution and Struc- Wa Nd it was tackled in a ntinn¢ better way by the con- Xn, COMmittee on organiza- B ‘the’, drive for unification trade “union ’ movement: came strongest from the conven- tion floor. Resolutions of the committee on organization re- commending action on affiliation of unions presently outside of the Congress which appeared to hedge, or, attach strings on affi- liation procedures, were refered back to the Committee for re- moval of the passages objected to. While the referals never found their way back to the convention floor there can be no doubt that the Administration got the mes- sage — to proceed with dispatch in taking “all reasonable steps” to bring ‘about complete unity within the Canadian trade union movement.” Convention action taken on unity resolutions and on the re- commendations of the Commis- sion on Constitution and Struc- ture combined with the express- ed will of the delegates moved Congress policy on affiliation a significant step forward. Doors have been opened towards uni- fication that have been closed for a long time.,._ , a A welcome step in this direc- w tion is the removal of the ban on the Communist Party and Communists from the constitu- tion. Important also is the grow- ing will to debate Policy differences in respect to trade union positions on economic and foreign policy directions within the concept of a united movement. Assisting also togthe further development of a united and sovereign movement were the defining of the CLC’s rela- tions with the AFL-CIO as being fraternal and not Structural, and the decision to charter trade de- partments under the CLC ban- ner. The will to debate basic policy questions in convention produced a Statement on Inter- national Affairs much improved in content over that submitted by the Administration. It moved the Congress into a much strong- er position vis-a-vis the Vietnam war and Canada’s role in help- ing to bring that brutal US. aggression to an end. It result- ed also in moving Congress to . venture. forth. into the; field) of). cultural exchanges with that great part of the world’s trade union movement which lies with- in the boundaries of the social- ist countries. However, there is little will as yet to debate basic policy as it bears on the question of Cana- dian unity. The convention is adopting the Report on Consti- tution and Structure declared that “trade unionists have a spe- cial stake in making Confedera- tion work because divisions within the country as a whole will undoubtedly affect our ef. forts toward unifying the labor movement and also have other damaging consequences.” How- ever, the actions taken do not measure up to the truth of this statement. For while the decision to in- tensify Congress efforts to im- Prove the bicultural and bilin- gual nature of all its Operations and those of its affiliates can be welcomed as steps in the right direction, they don’t face up to the real nature of the problem, namely, that Canada comprises two sovereign: peoples’: — French and English speaking — within its borders, This is the problem which was hidden behind the dispute be- tween the CLE executive coun- cil and the Quebec Federation of Labor over federation rights and autonomy. This was the real reason why there were two French Canadian nominees for one of the two top vice-presi- dencies. Only the g00d sense of the delegate Majority (which in- cluded the 556 who voted for left-winger Bil] Stewart) in elect- ing Rancourt saved the Con- gress from a situation which could have only led to a widen- ing gulf between it and the QFL. The Administration proved to be more farsighted and flexible on other major questions before the convention. This factor, but- tressed by the vigorous partici- pation of the delegate body for forward-looking policies, pro- duced results which places the 7th Constitutional Convention of the CLC in the ranks of Similar labor gatherings which have “Thade “theif mark" ti’ the history” Sof Canadian 4ab6H)i 219A: PACIFIC TRIBUNE—MAY 17, 1968. Pages Yi ae, “*¥ 9o04