| 25 years ago... HBACKS FROM COURTS SEIZE ROSENBERG CHILDREN Michael and Robert Rosen- \) berg, 10 and six years of age, @ children of they martyred Ethel ¥ and Julius whose execution last. } June stirred the anger of mill- ions of people are now being tortured by the New York City | Welfare Dept. Messages of the /act are pouring into Mayor » Robert Wagner fronrall‘parts of the world. The welfare commissioner is j seeking the appointment of a ) new guardian over the children in the courts. Both boys were ‘subjected to a typical swooping down of police cruisers and city officials at the home of Ann and Abe Meeropol, where they were ~ staying. Only the previous night the ) children had learned. of. the § sudden death of their guardian ’ Emanuel Bloch, the ) berg’s defence lawyer. osen- Tribune, » January 25, 1954 50 years ago... RELEASE IMPRISONED U.S. LABOR LEADER Jack Johnston, prominent militant labor leader of the Un- ited States is still held as a prisoner by British imperialism inIndia, Johnston was arrested by the Anglo-Indian igo Gernniehe in Dgaria, India where he went as a~representative of: the: world organization of anti-imperialist | leagues to speak at the All India Trade Union Congress, Dec. 25 to Jan. 1. His message to the Congress was an uncompromising attack upon reactionary policies in In- dia’s labor unions,.which are’ controlled by British puppets, and a demand that the workers of India control their own unions and lead the struggle against imperialist exploitation. For this he was arrested. © . _ The Worker, January 26, 1929 Profiteer of the week: Not only house-buying and renting, but transit, shopping, recreation, health and child care facilities and other cost-of-living factors are largely decided by developers. (See James Lorimer’s book, The Developers.) A by-product of developers’ good deeds is pro- fit, e.g., Daon Development Corp., Vancouver, hada tax-free $16,720,000 for the year ended Oct. 31, 1978. A year before it was $10,551,000. Figures used are from the company’s financial statements. Editor — SEAN GRIFFIN | Associate Editor — FRED WILSON Business and Circulation Manager — PAT O'CONNOR _ Published weekly at Suite 101 — 1416 Commercial Drive, — Vancouver, B.C. V5L 3X9 Phone 251-1186 Subscription Rate: Canada $10 one year; $6.00 for six months; 4 All other countries, $12 one year. Second class mail registration number 1560 EDINTORIAL COMIMIENT Guidelines for Jamieson — Events in Kampuchea and in Iran, which share-some similarities, have held the centre of attention of late, and with good reason. Both the Pol Pot regime in Kampuchea, bolstered.by Maoism, and the regime of Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi in Iran, have earned the hatred of their peoples for their brutality and enforcement of poverty. Iran, long a U.S. military stronghold, dangerous to the peace of the world, and a source of oil for expansionist Israel and racist South Africa, is in what may be but one stage of a process. The Shah has gone. Can his chosen govern- ‘| ment head, Shapour Bakhtiar, be far behind? : Demonstrations in Teheran call ever more loudly for the expulsion as well of the U.S. presence in all its forms. The corruption, oppression and poverty of the masses of people under the Shah, went hand-in-hand with his close ties with the USA and the squandering of billions on arms purchases from U‘S. arms makers. Heir apparent in Iran’s next stage, Moslem religious leader Ayatollah Khomainiso far gives the USA no hope of regaining its influence. These are facts of the living history we are watching. But some clear asser- tions must be made. If not for the Soviet Union and its stern warning against gunboat diplomacy, U.S. troops would already be there. If not for Soviet and Vietnamese steadfastness, the Western propaganda steamroller would by now have thoroughly rewritten the. success- ful struggle of the Kampuchean people. The propaganda is still rolling out but it has been unable to wipe out the real events. < Canada’s position has been hypocriti- cal, and the press of Canada has played a foul role, distorting the Kampuchean -people’s victory to pass it off as a. Vietnamese invasion rather than the rising of a people against despotism. | - External Affairs Minister Jamieson is on record on both issues. He stated that Canada’s interests lay with keeping the Shah in power — along with all the skulduggery of the CIA until it misread the mood of the Iranians. The Cana- dian Government should admit its guilt in lining up with a regime unwanted by the citizens of the country. On Kampuchea, Jamieson, along with U.S. spokesmen, and dozens of U.S. and Canadian capitalist ,publications, is on record — in fact Jamieson raised it at the United Nations — protesting the “gross and persistent violations” of human rights by the Pol Pot clique. ‘Now what has happened? The Cana- dian Government clings to recognition _ of that ousted band of butchers. That is ~ far from good enough. Ottawa should recognize the new Government of Kampuchea, the People’s Revolutionary Council, headed by Heng Samrin. Such recognition should. be forthcoming without another day’s delay. It is inappropriate for Canada to parrot the unctious and hypocritical line of the USA — the USA which raped Vietnam — and now cries rapist to protect its own imperialist interests and those of the adventurist Chinese leader- ship. For the Canadian Government the guideline should be: Hands off Iran! Recognize the People’s Revolutionary Council of Kampuchea! _ Aneye on UK labor fight In strike-bound Britain, truckers and railway workers lead a growing protest — over the 5% pay ceiling enacted by the so-called Labor ‘government. The government, under severe pressure from the right, has before it. at this moment a choice of acceding to work- ers’ just demands, declaring a state of emergency and calling in the troops to operate all transport, or reaching ag- reement with enough right-wing union leaders to break the strike movement. The .situation is not so remote for Canadian workers. We too have experi- enced a wage freeze while prices and profits soared ‘skyward. And pressure from the right in Canada is for more stringent controls\ on wages, more handouts to corporations, a_ brutal crackdown on all the social benefits won . in hard struggle over decades of battl- ing. ve It is clear that one thing the British workers need is fearless, militant leader- ship, leadership which will not.sell out, - not give up, but lead the fight to prevent the working class being pushed into the abyss the monopoly system has ready. What of Canada? What of the 2.3- million member Canadian Labor Con- gress and its president, Dennis McDer- mott? As one who talks a lot about the New Democratic Party, Canada’s party of social democrats, like Britain’s Labor Party, what is McDermott’s position, by comparison? It’s no secret he spearheads tripartite talks with government and big business, despite CLC policy against it. The businessmen’s press recognizes his “ac- comodating and conciliatory posture toward business and government.” The social democrat government in Britain is showing that political move- ment’s worst side, the unwillingness of | the so-called Labor government to take the side of the workers against the inroads of monopoly capitalism. It lays bare the point on which right-wing social democrats and communists differ — the former do not want to get rid of the system of bankers and board room tycoons, and introduce a socialist system to benefit the working people and the vast majority. This is no time for trade union leadership to “accomodate” and “con- ciliate” in the interests of the profit and power of the corporations and their governments. Trade unionists across this country may find an interesting lesson in the situation in Britain, com- bined with the grim facts of the war on labor-in Canada. It’s a militant battle for labor’s positions, not accomodation to protect the system, that is demanded of ‘trade union and workers’ political lead- ers. PACIFIC TRIBUNE—JANUARY 26, 1979—Page 3