a , ay card MOPAR L Tale Mf)
Pee ee rh! ere AT FONT HAR CLEA ALPS ACCEL oe AED Lh, IRR EP ANS bier at pears 1 TT a tld Agen ge nie
7 . re Oe ch A i, UG beat 1 ART Ce So UR EAPTEn Ra HL aC it ant Has. TRO AN ro
SCHISM ACSIA AD NSA VCTL RMT oI Shemisr era ' ‘ Pi Me te Madde BN or Sat Ata Nl Distegttt
Ra ing Haig TAINO ARTE ies Sita t i Ate Ae i] i k AUDEN ty } Pi Fa rity 4 RARER Aap ‘
DENT AO TE ORNS ie pedal a label oy CANE ti Maa hy i ‘
‘ a tH Ns : il ‘4
mp Ration y
La ie ieee ‘ ¢ : ‘ ; Hh
EAA tiara asta + ites Bas i afi
‘ aye [a ae 8! % HAs tthe H hy 5 uu tine a red 4 Watlnthn
sated esl tok! Due tapialiad * “ fa a ae (Ht tae Me ar Oo UE
inate eee ‘ ut BN ae: ie ‘ petite mk ines
aN yea METRO CAL DT EDM TGR De eM Rat nas it srt Ga ge ta) satiate Ce) PaeH RCL ty i ARS iy STEMS
inh ot i 8th f OREN TEA ag “ths : \ mati (inet ua Aca pb ova Fi ps eee : hal aes lah}
cae ORO SMI SE Hee ge a URE ECE BE AEE SHO MN as ALT TSI uE NCL) Sec eHen Orisa i maT TAR

ysifeity f

THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM

2272 McALLISTER AVENUE
PORT COQUITILAM, B.C, TELEPHONES: 941.5411
V3G 2A8

OUR FILE

awe tranny

Don Lidstone,

Mackenzlea Lidstone,
Barristers & solleltors,
P.O. Bax 49059, . |
1860 Three Banta] | Centre,
395 Burrard Street,
~VYancouver, 8.C.
V7X iC4

A eae Sa mt oN ene

eS EPS

Dear Don: |
: ; . | Re: Sign Bylaw

Dewey

Ve ew

In operating the Sign Bylaw over the past three months, we have
encountered soma smal | Introduction problems,. Consequently, +.
am weiting to share our experience with you and to seek your
advice regarding an amendment, . |

+See ee

‘To belng, | would. explain that the sign to property size ratio
Was. proven to be too, restrictive, follawing an open bylaw that
did not. regulate Sign size. As a result we are recommanding
- the ratios tn Column Ill of Schedule D be doubled,
A second prablem that | would ask you to look at for us is
Section 10, regulating multt=tenant buildings. What we need is
to clarify that a tenant is not affected by a neighbour that
has too much signage, fa, relating a tenant's signage to only
thelr pertton of the Total site area ignoring neighbouring
tanants excessive signage (at least during a two year
Introductory term), — |
In addition to the Problem of to much signage we have also
encountered a problem with removal of Signs following a
business closure, As It presently stands there is no
compulsion far a new tenant te elther use or remove the
previous occupant'!s signage. Consequently, we are gaging to
have to explore a mechanism to elther oblige oronerty owners to
remove disused signs of anter Into a bonding scheme, | would
not like to do. the latter,

a eae

L

Your help otn dealing with these probiems is aporeciated, | f
you want, | could axpand on this letter ime) give you a clearer
Image of our problem, |

| Yours Truly,

‘

W,. Brown,
Director of Communit tv Plannina.

epee dpe : ae

i
“4

SH OTH SLUR Free sOcoar re aan irene 0 Tip Prone era eenricaey La RUT In ivete nets ncaa enernein

BIL GAYA VAL Wyant gel ee , $4 ; Tae ENUM AY

HEN) Mada eh AP a PORN LARA Eh oh tadl
i : ‘ 4

ae
Sanda aeeeg