THE CORPORATION OF THE CG 0 U N C [ {
CITY OF PORT COQUITLAM ' -
MEMORANDUM FEB 13 1984

TO: B.R. Kirk - «= February 10th, 1984
City Administrator

"FROM: R.A. Freeman
City Clerk

)Serer: 1884 Coquitlam Avenue

RECOMMENDATION:

That Counc | give consideraticn to passage of one of the following two '
- resolutions: :

1. "That the city. Clerk be instructed to invite the owners and ail holders
of registered: charges of Lots 1 & 2, Block.5, District Lot 466, Plan
2294, New ‘Westminster District; being 1884 Coquitlam Avenue, Port
Coquitlam, B.C. to the reguiar meeting of the Municipal Council of The
Corporation of the City: of Port Coquitlam being held on- Monday, February
27th, 1984 to show cause why the Council should not take action under
Section 936 of the Municipal Act to declare the building located on the
said Property to :be a Nuisance and to order the demolition thereof."

he “That: no. further action be taken, based on the evidence submitted to
date, to require-the ‘demolition. of the building located at. 1884
Coquitiam Avenue; PROVIDED that the City's Building Inspection
Department.closely monitor: the Situation and advise the Council if
corrective action is recommended .

‘BACKGROUND AND COMMENTS:

-- Fol towing this memorandum is a photocopy of a petition received in my office

- on: February one 1984 respecting the above noted subject. A report fromthe
City's Building Inspection Department also follows and you will note the
Building inspector's comments contained therein.

If the Council are of the opinion that the demolition of the structure
should be ordered the resolution quoted first above: should receive
favourable consideration as the principles of natural justice require that
the owners and:other. persons having an interest in the building be permitted
to address the Counci! prior to the Council formally ordering the demolition
of the building. At the Council meeting of February 27th, 1984
representations from the owner and other interested parties (including the
petitioners) could be received and the Council could make its decision

‘accordingly.

On the other hand, should the Council be satisfied that corrective action is
not necessary at this time then the second suggested resolution stated above

‘could be passed.

RAF/dv
R.A.Freeman

CL-02/06/84 City Clerk

“hall SE Tact MAIR PRO OLE 9 Zetea gable brad fa nathey