It is amazing how quickly the mass media dropped David Lewis’s charges about the Cor- porate Rip-Off and the Corpor- ate Welfare Bums and substitut- ed the unemployed recipients of unemployment insurance bene- fits as the most objectionable Rip-Off Artists. It is far from accidental that all concessions granted in the matter of tax reform legisla- tion, social security and general economic policy by the Trudeau administration have gone to monopoly. Instead of a ‘just society’ we have drifted steadily towards a ‘means-test’ society for workers thrown on the scrap- heap by the selfish profit motive of big businéss. It is the large monopolies, the huge international corporations, who dictate government policies and who manipulate the mass media to suit their own aims. How well they have succeeded in this terrible swindle has been illustrated beyond belief in the statements by such progressive and hitherto widely trusted peo- ple as Reuben Baetz, executive director of the Canadian Council of Social Development, _ and Edward Broadbent NDP-MP., to mention only two. It will simply mean disaster if the Trudeau administration is pushed into further concessions to reactionary demands for the emasculation of the Unemploy- ment Insurance Act. _ Paid for by Workers An attempt is being made to create the impression in the public mind that unemployment ° insurance is a welfare scheme paid for out of tax revenue. This is a lie. It is an insurance scheme for which workers pay premiums along with employer contributions, and which is then being augmented by contribu- tions from public revenue to which workers again contribute in the form of taxes collected at the source. Even the unemploy- ment insurance benefits are now taxed, so that $100 per week which is the highest benefit paid actually becomes $85 per week after income taxes are deducted. For workers the loss of jobs is a disaster. Workers do not choose to be unemployed. They are the victims of unemployment and policies that aggravate un- employment. It is the employers that decide to close plants and businesses, pursuing their profit motive regardless of consequen- ces in terms of growing unem- ployment. As the Communist Party told the parliamentary committee BY BRUCE MAGNUSON LABOR SCENE Sanceciclsel ground -swell to protect UIC rights conducting public hearings on the new Unemployment Insur- ance Act in 1970: “The econo- mic, legislative and social poli- cies which in our days and age determine in large measure country-wide economic develop- ment and the creation’ of new jobs are in the hands of govern- ments. Unemployed workers ought not be penalized and forced to accept a lower stand- ard of living because of circum- stances beyond their control. «> inasmuch as unemploy- ment is a direct responsibility of private and corporate employers, the cost of unemployment in- -surance should be a charge against corporate earnings and profits. “Because government too is an employer of labor, as well as the determining factor in the projection of economic, legisla- tive and social policies, it should assume its rightful share of the cost of unemployment insurance, to be a charge against general public revenue. “Since unemployment is not a matter governed by the indivi- dual concerned but is a social problem rather than a private personal issue, unemployment insurance should be non-contri- butory as far as workers are concerned. This would be a just way of handling the situation. We believe that some day that principle will be accepted and enacted into law of the land.” Rightfully Earned If there is anything wrong with the Unemployment Insur- ance Act it is not that it is too generous as far as workers are concerned. It does not go far enough to give workers their just and rightfully earned con- sideration. Why, for instance should there be a waiting period of two weeks before insurance becomes payable? It penalizes a worker and his family for loss of a job beyond his control. Why should there be a gap between the worker’s regular paycheck and the worker’s receipt of Un- employment Insurance Benefits? Payments ought to be payable for the entire period of involun- tary unemployment. Presently the average ULI. benefit collected is $66 per week for and average of 15 weeks. For a family man this is not rid- ing on a gravy train. It is totally inadequate. No person. collects $100 per week and average time collected is not 51 weeks as the propaganda mills suggest. There is no mystery about the fact that a growing number of unemployed means a rise in the payout of benefits, which in turn Want tracks off watertront By CHARLES MASCOT WINDSOR — Even capitalist politicians are speaking in favor of removing the railway tracks from our city. Among other ad- vantages, this could lead to bet- ter use of land. Characteristic of spokesmen of big business is that they don’t say at whose expense this should be done. Since it is highly desirable that all of our railways be merged into one state-owned system, the profits accruing from such a system could well PERE PORK ee 2 Poe be a source for payment of such removal. This is not to say that the clearing of the tracks from the city must necessarily wait the state takeover of the railways. It does mean that working peo- ple must not be burdened with the cost. More and more people in. Windsor are ‘demanding the re- moval of the CNR tracks from. the waterfront and the CPR freight yards that cut off about a mile of east-west traffic. This can be started imme- diately. cause an increase in premiums paid, including contribution by the government. There is no other way, except to leave the unemployed to starve. Perhaps this is what Mr. Broadbent forgets when he talks about the legal aspect of gov- ernment contributions. Or Mr. Baetz when he contradicts his own testimony before the parlia- mentary committee in 1970. It is to say the least, ironic, that with the honorable excep- tion of Bryce Mackasey’s excel- lent reply to Reuben Baetz, the reactionary attempt to make un- employed Canadians the scape- goats for disastrous economic policies by government and big business, is not being challenged: by the trade union movement, whose leaders are conspicuous by their stony silence on this matter. This situation must be revers- ed by a universal chorus of de- mands from every local union, labor council and provincial fe- deration, that labor will not tolerate any emasculation of the Unemployment Insurance Act. If there is a need for any through investigation of any- thing it is not the Unemploy- . ment Insurance operations as demanded by Tory House Leader Gerald Baldwin, but rather the big Corporate Rip-Off and the amount of tax evasion and inter- est-free loans given to mono- polies which runs into billions every year. ., | AM FIGHTING INFLATION: SVE WIS AZ, Our uranium sent to Spain OTTAWA—Canada has signed a sales agreement with Franco Spain for nearly $60 million, in- volving some nine _ million pounds of uranium oxide. It will be used by Spanish electric util- ity companies for the generation of electric power. So says the President of Uranium Canada Ltd., Jack Austin. Mr. Austin is also deputy minister of energy, mines and resources, and he signed the agreement in Madrid on behalf of the Government of | Canada. Also signing the agree- ment were Stephen B. Roman, defeated Tory federal candidate, who is chairman of the board of Denison Mines Ltd, and John Kostuik, President of Denison. Denison Mines negotiated the agreement on behalf of Canada’s Liberal government. \ Communists stronger after election Party calls for banner year in “73 The main report to the, Centra] Committee-of the Communist Party of Canada by Party leader William Kashtan (excerpts from which appeared in last week’s Tribune) was adopted unanim- ously by passage of the following resolution on the last day of the meeting, Nov. 26. The Central Committee adopts the report On the Outcome of the October Federal Election submitted to the meeting by Comrade Kashtan on behalf of the Central Executive Committee. . _ The Report outlines the tasks confronting the Party and all Communists in this period of minority Liberal government with the New Democrats holding the balance of power. The Report correctly emphasizes that the outcome of the election creates the possibility for the working people through organized mass strug- gle to win important concessions from the gov- ernment, while at the same time laying a basis for further electoral gains in the next election when it comes. In adopting the main report the Central Com- mittee declares that Party organizations and members across the country can be justly proud of the contribution the Communist Party made to the general election campaign in bringing to the forefront the vital issues confronting the people at this time — issues all other parties tried to sweep under the rug. It is to the great credit of the Party that by the valiant efforts of its candidates,’ election committees and campaign workers the Party’s election program was taken to millions of Cana- dians through the platform, leaflets, advertise- ments, newspaper, ‘radio and television coverage, election meetings and debates. The Central Committee heartily congratulates all Party members and supporters who took the Party’s election platform to better than 600,000 homes in house to house distribution, put up thousands of posters, distributed tens of thous- ands of election leaflets, the Canadian Tribune, Combat, Pacific Tribune and Young Worker, canvassed and participated in sccres of all- candidate and Party election meetings. The Central Committee heartily thanks and congratulate the Young Communist League, its officers and members who so ably and energetic- y d FD AGT AGE Ete ally assisted the Party in this great election campaign. The Central Committee particularly congratulates the eight YCL members from B.C., Alberta, Ontario and Quebec, who as candidates of the Communist Party conducted excellent campaigns adding a refreshing youthful aspect to the Party’s image. The experiences gained by all Party Commit- tees across the country during the election has proven in life that the 21st Convention of the Party was correct when it demanded that the Party lift its sights and run a maximum number of candidates. : The election demonstrated that the Party grows politically, ideologically, morale-wise and numerically when it campaign in a truly mass way for its own independent positions skilfully blended with a strong unity policy. © The Central Committee declares that the Party is stronger for the election campaign. It is strengthened from the improved reception ac- corded our election workers from the people they met in their door to door work. It is strengthened by the lively interest in our election materials and proposals shown by many voters. It has drawn new strength from the many non- Party workers who came forward and volunteer- ed their services as election workers. It is stronger politically and numerically by the ad- dition of new members who joined the Party’s rank during the election campaign. : In view of the new ground and new possibil- ities opened up by the Party’s pre-election and election work, and above all, because the work- ing class needs a strong Communist Party if it is to win new policies and a new direction for Canada, defeat the danger from the Right and — elect a large progressive group to Parliament in the next election, the Central Committee calls upon every Party committee, every Party mem- ber to make 1973 a banner year for Party, YCL r gtagetee 3% | eyes i 1? Ses -and’Press' building.’ |” PACIFIC TRIBUNE “FRIDAY, BECEMBER 8! 1972-4PaGE Ss APIEC IID WADVSIeT CHELAN OAT