=) Freedom for Winston A united aid Winston. national board member of the Communist Party of the U.S.A., charged un- der the notorious Smith Act back in 1950 of “conspiring to advocate overthrow of the U.S. govern- ment,” sentenced to five years imprisonment, with an ad- was ditional three years for alleged ‘contempt’ of McCarthy witch- hunters. When the financial overlords of Yankee imperialism talk loud- ly of American “freedoms” which they want to foist upon the rest of the world, they exclude Ameri- can workers like Henry Winston. The reason for such exclusion is not difficult to assess. Henry Winston is a Communist leader and a Negro to boot, an unpar- donable combination in the eyes of coldwar maniacs. As such his sentence is meted out, not only to the full extent of the law, but far beyond. Henry Winston went into Terre Haute Prison, a strong healthy man of 40-years. Today, as a re- sult of brutal and inhuman treat- ment, he is a cripple. Totally blind, paralysed in the legs and unable to walk without assistance, these are the results of medical neglect of a serious brain tumor, for which nothing was done until too late to save his health; effective treatment withheld on the official assump- tion that Winston was “goofing” or, in Canadian prison lingo “swinging the lead.” Thus through criminal neglect, blindness and paralysis have been added to Winston’s sentence, and in Montefiore Hospital he still re- mains a helpless federal prisoner, with a 24-hour guard posted at his bedside to bar all visitors save Pacific Tribune Editor —- TOM McEWEN Associate Eduor — MAURICE RUSH Business Mgr. — OXANA BIGELOW Published weekly at Room 6 — 426 Main Street Vancouver 4, B.C. Printed in a Union Shop Subscription - Rates: One Year: $4.00 Six Months: $2.25 Canadian and Commonwealth countries (except Australia): $4.00 one year. Australia, United States and all other countries: $5.00 one year. Phone MUtual 5-5288 ce LU ILA his attorney and his wife. As if that were not enough, fed- eral authorities now work fever- ishly to have Henry Winston in- carcerated in the Missouri Prison hospital, where white supremacy rules and where, to quote a cir- cular on the Winston case, “cir- cumstances would condemn Win- ston to a slow and torturous death.” From ~Henry Winston, Negro and Communist leader, the mor- ons of dollar imperialism have al- ready exacted their full measure of the vengeance they call “jus- tice.” That fact should be made known to them, not only by Am- erican working people, but by tens of thosands of indignant men and women everywhere who love freedom and decency. Protest the U.S. government’s brutal treatment of Henry Win- ston. Tell Eisenhower that justice freedom and decency, like char- ity, must begin at home — and in this instance, begin with free- dom and full compensation for Henry Winston. oe Mon September 12 is elec- tion day. Following a long period of speculation on the prob- 4 able date, during which Socred Premier Bennett played a cagey cat-anGg-mouse game with opposi- tion parties and the electorate, the premier finally gave out with his long-awaited date. Outside Socred ranks the ‘hur- ras’ were somewhat dulled by the premier cutting the time limit be- tween announcement and election day down to the finest minimum required by law, thereby hoping to catch his opponents with their campaign pants at the party cleaners. A big round of Socred ‘birth- day’ celebrations, nominations, back-slapping and other political hoopla, set the stage for the pre- mier’s bid for a “new mandate” for another four years or so of Socred service to monopoly, and smug skulduggery (with a few crumbs thrown in) for the people. According to Mr. Bennett the only issue in this election is “pro- gress versus politics’, meaning of course that “progress” is synon- omous with Socredism, while “pol- itics’” covers all other political vote needed lowbrows who are critical of Soc- red _ claims. The slogan is as phoney as its designers. The issues in this election are not the fine milking qualities of the Socred Cow, but the issues of peace or war, jobs or mass unem-' ployment, the family farm versus monopoly profits, the peoples’ re- sources versus Socred giveaways, the tax dollar for peoples’ wellbe- ing or down the arms drain; vital issues which the Socreds have surrendered to the monopoly pro- fiteers without one pious squawk. A united effort at the polls on September 12 by workers, farm- ers and large sections of the peo- ple against Socred evasion of is- sues and monopoly giveaways can turn the tide. Eight years of rooking and bamboozling, in which the people have been serv- ed Socred froth instead of sub- stance, now presented as “pro- gress.” From now on in until Septem- ber 12 the paramount duty of la- bor and the people is not only to vote, but to vote unitedly to end this Socred-monopoly stranglehold on B.C. Tom McEwen | ELIEVE it took a Tory government to rewrite the fable of The Three Bears. It happened this way. Our bears are friendly. chaps with a strong it or not, co-existence - complex. To solve this problem it is said the Dief government has expended a lot of “thought’,- (which might have been put to better use on other and more. pressing -matters). As explained. by Northern. Af- fairs Minister. Alvin Hamilten, this “thought” involves - taking bears “‘who are overly. friendly, to some distant spot, and painting their rear ends red.” This solution has already in- spired numerous poets and modern Aesop fable writers, with the re- sult that the charming. story of The Three Bears promises to be- come a heavy volume. Here is one version as -seen by the News of the North (NWT) trapping them and removing them: editor. “Once upon a time there were three bears who lived in a cave in Banff National Patk. There was a Mama Bear, a Papa Bear and a little Baby Bear. “Now little Baby Bear was just a little tiny bear and he _ hadn’t yet had a chance to slap a tourist and get a paint job done on his transmission. But both Papa Bear and Mama Bear wore their badge of distinction with pride, even go- ing so far as to walk backwards so that all might see and admire. “One morning the Bear family woke up and Mama Bear backed into the stove as she was getting breakfast, (awkward getting break- fast walking backwards, you know)..Papa Bear’s paint job was beginning. to flake a little, and they had. made up their minds anyway to get a renewal. “So this morning. Mama. got cross. A Bear with a burned paint job .-does get angry, and Mama said. she wouldn’t cook another bit until she:and Papa» Bear went to the Game Office and got a patch job. “So off they..went; Mama Bear cross about her hot seat, Papa Bear cross about the delay in breakfast, and Baby Bear hungry. “While they were gone a little girl slipped into the house and self.” after a brief reconnaisance, details of which need little review, was caught by the return of the Bear family, all but Baby Bear quite pleased with the red brilliance of their tail lights. “They knew someone was around the old hacienda, the little girl had been careless, but Mama Bear and Papa Bear just sat back smiling. and said to Baby Bear, “here’s your chance to prove your- “So Baby Bear went into the house ... “And now Baby Bear too, backs up as he ‘approaches strange animals and people in the forest, for he too wears the Alvin Hamil- ton Splash, right where it does the most good.” Oh, Alvin, how could you? Even the staid Lethbridge Her- ald broke into a poetic rash on ‘this Tory. red-paint version. of The Three Bears. Here. are two- scin- tillating stanzas— “But problems are for government Mere nothing. So in Parliament The answer's given, briefly said; We'll paint the bad bears’ back- sides red. "We hail this ingenuity, But still remains a mystery; How do you tell a bear’s unkind While running, if the bear’s behind?” —_ August 12, 1960—PACIFIC TRIBUNE—Page 4