BY BERT WHYTE Boom’s “false front’ hides slump threat ARK TWAIN once said that a mine was “a hole in the ground with a liar sitting at the top.” Twain was taking a crack. at the unscrupulous stock promoters who got rich quick by selling worthless mining stocks to gull- ible citizens who were also hop- ing to get rich quick. For every mine that comes into production, a dozen holes in the ground cease operations after the stock-buying suckers have been thoroughly trimmed. One producing mine and a doz- en holes in the ground: usually means the birth of a thriving, if short-lived, mining boom town. They all look the Same—and the inevitable label is a busy busi- ness section of false-fronted clap- board buildings. A false front, in case you aren’t familiar with boom towns, is a two or three-storey “front” on a one-storey building. From the street such a building looks im- pressive; take a walk around back and you see that the frontier “skyscraper” isn’t really much larger than a good-sized privy. Canadians industrialists are erecting many a “false front” these days to conceal the actual state of the country’s economy. And nowhere are they busier than in British Columbia, where our sagging economy has to be camouflaged more and more each day. Like Mark Twain’s stock pro- moters, British Columbian busi- *ness tycoons are raking in money hand over fist. They are doing this by exploiting labor and ex- ploiting our province’s natural resources. In most cases these natural resources aren’t being de- veloped with the wellbeing of the Canadian people in mind; they are, instead, being handed over to big business in the United States, for the sake of quick profits. Industry in Canada is coming under the complete domination of the Yankee colossus to the south; our economy becomes de- pendent upon ge whims of Wash- ington. Some day. sie sat such policies of betrayal are reversed—we'll wake up to find B.C.’s “false front” of prosperity has collaps- ed. We'll be left with the shacks (a Canadianized Hooverville) and the hole in the ground—known as a depression. The liars will be lolling on the sands at Palm Beach or Bermuda, while we join the breadlines in Vancouver. On the same day that the Paci- fic Tribune appeared on the strets last week with a story giving fig- ures on mounting layoffs in in- dustry, the daily papers*ran glow- ing articles about this province’s postwar industrial boom — the building of new pulp and paper plants, plywood annd lumber mills, hydro-electric and alumin- um projects, railroad building, oil refineries and manufacturing plants. Industry has developed with seven-league hoots in B.C.—but in a fashion that makes an econ- emic crisis a certainty unless economic and political policies undergo a rapid change. The growing lines of jobless, the loss of markets for lumber, fish, min- ing and farm products, all add up to a coming depression—un- less. Unless what? Unless we, the people, unite to Put Canada First, to stop the United States domination of. our This means a fight against the “sell and give-away” policies of Canadian big business, which is tied hand and foot to the U.S. trusts and monopolies, which are only too eager to gobble up our country. It means a fight in the field of parliamentary action and among the workers to win support for a program of peace, people’s wel- fare, democracy and Canadian in- dependence. Capitalism inevitably breeds de- pressions and wars. But people’s action can delay or halt certain depressions and certain wars. Do that, and, because history is dy- , namic, relationships change in the course of struggle, and it be- comes possible—and easier—to carry forward the fight to end . depressions and war altogether, by the ushering in of a new so- cial system. The Labor-Progressive party has launched a National Plan to Beat the Threat of Depression and Put Canada First. It puts for- ward the idea that productive employment and people’s purch- asing power can be maintained at prosperity levels by national ac- tion to develop Canada in peace and trade with all countries. Planks in the LPP plan call for British Commonwealth trade’ through acceptance of sterling in exchange for Canadian products; Canadian trade missions to the Soviet Union, People’s China, In- dia and the People’s Democracies; building Canadian economy by processing our own raw materials: immediate work on an All-Cana- dian St. Lawrence Seaway; fed- eral-provincial construction of a publicly-owned Trans-Canada natural gas pipeline; and other measures waich add up to a new national policy, a democratic people’s alternative to the crisis- producing policy now being fol- lowed by the St. Laurent gov- ernment. “Not a Single Worker Needs to be Laid Off if We Put Canada First!” is the LPP slogan which in coming months will be raised in every industry and community. The thousands of unemployed workers in B.C. should be among the first to respond to this slog- an; and before B.C.’s “boom” in industry reaches the “bust” stage, thousands of trade unionists will begin to understand-and support the LPP’s Put Canada First pro- gram. LETTERS DIGEST Cc. S. STEWART of Yellow- knife, N.W.T., sends in a long letter touching on a variety of questions (war, peace, Social Credit, communism, militarism, consumer credit, big power ne- gotiations). We would like him to develop at least one of his _ ideas in greater detail. - LEOPOLD LAMOUREUX of Vancouver sends in a subscrip- tion and says that it makes him “very happy that we are fighting for something worth while . . peace and independence from control of the United States.” JOCK TAYLOR of Kelowna writes on “the Doug Hepburn controversy” and asks corre- spondent Frank Coller to “re- member that politics penetrates barbells, too.” He warns Bert Whyte that “you are running in- to ‘strong’ competition, exclud- ing this writer.” “For heayven’s sake stop worrying about the depression, Henry.” BY WILLIAM KASHTAN Mine-Mill gives lead in fight for Canadian union aufonom) Sapeteeat the proceedings ~ of the international conventions of the Mine-Mill and the United Electrical Workers I was struck not only by the generally for- ward looking policies these con- ventions adopted but more so by the way they dealt with the ques- tion of Canadian autonomy. Mine-Mill unanimously adopt- ed a proposal to amend its con- stitution with the aim of spelling out the rights and duties of its recently established Canadian council. The amendment is in- teresting enough to merit reprint here. This is the section. “In recognition of the fact that the membership of the In- ternational Union in Canada has district and separate na- tional aspirations and is con- cerned with distinct and separ- ate national problems, the local unions in Canada shall have the right and the duty to organize a Canadian Mine-Mill Council of which all such local unions shall , be a part and which shall have its own bylaws. Upon approval of the International Executive Board, such bylaws shall be binding upon the International Union and all local unions in Canada. The International Ex- ecutive Board shall take no action inconsistent with such by- laws and shall otherwise take . no action having specific and direct application to the Cana- dian membership without con- sultation with, and approval of the Canadian Mine-Mill Coun- cil.” Another amendment to the constitution was also. endorsed by the convention. This has to do with the election of vice-presi- dents. Where before only. two were elected now there will be three, one of whom is to be a Canadian elected by the Cana- dian membership only. These two amendments will be the Subject of a referendum vote on November 2. Once adopt- ‘for what purpose? ed they will be immediately op- erative. Every indication points to overwhelming membership en- dorsation of the two proposals. Undoubtedly it will mark an important step forward in the further strengthening of the autonomy of Mine-Mill in Can- ada. And, by example, it is bound to give considerable im- petus to the growing demand for the autonomy and independence of the Canadian trade union movement. “The fact that the international convention amendments attests to the strong understanding of what interna- tionalism means today by both the leadership and American membership of Mine-Mill. 6 These developments ‘ contrast rather sharply with the policies of those international unions which are under right-wing lead- ership. In these unions the tendency is.in the opposite direction — towards the further suppression of the democratic and autono- mous rights of the Conrgien membership. Nor is this acci- dental for behind this policy of domination rather than cooper- ation between equals is the ob- jective of subordinating the ec- onomy of Canada to the needs of ‘U.S. imperialism. Consider what has happened since this stepped-up drive to deminate and control the Cana- dian trade -union movement started here. Not only was the CSU destroy- ed but in the process the SIU was established as a U.S. instru- ment to control Canadian ship- pink. And now that the Fisher- men’s Union in B.C. is suspend- ed from the TLC, the SIU is again being brought forward — To advance the interests of the fishermen? All the evidence again points to the fact that its purpose will endorsed _ these be to dominate and C0 dian fishing in the in the U.S. A similar situation in the textile industry’ ership of th not only becaus militantly on beh membership — but they fought against policies, largely res undermining both and livelihood of Ca? ers. e A growing body ists now begin to. see tion betweeen the dian sovereignty 20 gle for Canadian au trade movement. gether. To fail to. aso of ta oe thot tony ‘adian autonomy is Canandian soverel to fight in aerense 6 sovereignty 1S achievement 0 auton? independence. How true thi in the textile,’ implements and industries wher are undermining the pee. living standa Aue the cen toe omic crisis deepe?s to many other ind gustris | Thus, the in 0 tonomy is m trade union ed to a, much the fight to preserv! Canadian indu oat fo Canadian sovere att and higher living This fight nee up with renewed © trade union mov" Mill’s decisions oul, namattl