Communist Party of Canada supports CENTRAL EXECUTIVE STATEMENT Native Youth demand to be consulted The 24 hour occupation of the Indian Affairs Building in Ottawa served to focus public attention on the just griev- ances of Canada’s Native Peoples, Particularly the growing demand of Indian, Metis and Innuit peoples for a Say on all matters bearing on their affairs, The demand for a voice was well articulated by an official of the Native ‘Outh Association which organized the sit-in. “We're tired,” he said, “of having Indian Affairs ram programs down our throat. We want to be consulted. We know what program we need, and Overnment help must be coordinated With the aims of the Native Youth As- SOciation.” _The demand to be consulted was Underlined by the disclosure that the * A met with Minister of Indian Af- airs Chrétien last June with the re- Quest that he shelve a program, for- Mulated without consultation with the YA. Under this program the Depart- Ment hired 33 persons at an annual ny of $12,000 each to “help” NYA. 4 that time NYA asked that the kind Programs to be adopted should be 4 matter of negotiation. sare action of the Department bears is the charge made by the Commun- _ t Party in its 1969 policy statement Be Bill of Rights” that the federal ieee ement “strives to create a Native Service to act as a buffer between © Native Peoples and those of its Evers who are subservient to the gov- perent and the political parties of & business,” the i Communist Party supports fully mand of the NYA to be consult- » and commends the Native Youth e * Association for its militant assertion of this right. In their fight to win this right the Native Youth deserve the support of all democratic Canadians, particularly the trade union movement. For, this fight is part and parcel of the mighty struggles that must be waged for completely new policies, based on the principles of full equality for Can- ada’s Native Peoples. The Indian, Metis and Innuit are distinct peoples and their identity as . Such must be recognized and respected by the Canadian state. This being so, the Native Peoples must have full power to make their own decisions on all questions pertaining to their affairs. Native Youth Association rally at Parlia ment following their 24-hour sit in. The colonialist Indian Act should be replaced with a Bill of Rights for the Native Peoples, which codifies in the laws of Canada the full and equal rights of the Indian, Metis and Innuit Peoples with all Canadians — equality in. opportunity, full recognition and protection of all historic and treaty rights, recognition and just settlement of Indian land claims by a public com- mission on which Indians and Labor are adequately represented. In respect to just settlement of land claims the Communist,Party greets the historic decision by Mr. Justice Wil- liam Morrow to grant permission to the Indian Brotherhood of the North- west Territories to file a claim of inter- est in 400,000 square miles of the Northwest Territories. Indians must enjoy self-government on the reserves, and full freedom to move off the reserves without loss of treaty rights. All vestiges of racism and discrim- ination must be rooted out. The Native Peoples must have full equality in society and before the law, the strug- gle for which the Labor and Trade Union Movement should stand in the front ranks. The Communist Party calls for a massive social program to bring the health, housing, educational standard, training and job opportunities of the Native Peoples up to accepted Cana- dian standards. We demand adequate financial and other government assist- ance to develop Native cultures, re- vamp the whole education system for Native children, including instruction in the Native languages, with courses relevant to their cultures and job op- portunities staffed by Native people and operating with Native parent con- sent; the removal of all church control over Native education, and the revision of all history texts and literature which portray Natives as “savages”. The Communist Party urges the or- ganized labor movement to support fully the just struggle of the Indian, Metis and Innuit Peoples for their social and legal rights. For our part we will do all that lies within our power to assist the Native Peoples to attain their just demands. ~—MUCUUeeaeaevenceneneaneneneueeneaveneeueseeneaueneaneneeseeueaeeneaueneeseneegeenegseueeseseeeeusegHeseeseneeqeeeeneeueneeneseesueasese4vegueneeUeOUeeUeGeOUOGHeUUOUUOUUOUEGE EOOUODSOEEGEEGEOUEGEOLEOUEOUEOUELEGOUODEAUEOOOSEOUEOEOLOOEOUEUEOLEOEGLELE continue to pay today’s inflated prices for food and other neces- sary commodities for the period By MARK SYDNEY tp LTAWA—In a move geared 9 who Popular with consumers, ’ § have geen the prices of : ahead. i Piks In one area, the government Shoot up in the last year, iberal government an- has made a gesture. Commun- ists have called for the incorpor- ation of a cost of living escal- ator clause for pensions, family allowances, mothers’ and veter- Plans wer boost € also announced to ‘ family allowances ws lta intoctoper. ser: B new measures included: NEAD — an increased subsidy Omestie farmers on wheat used Will ¢ Cally, that supposedly "Pay fo, the price millers will flour +s wheat that goes into : MILK akeries, Subsidy a five-cents-a-quart tig) OM milk to the provin- they ane boards, which 80 tha Pass along to dairies, this = ened increase later Dar consumer prices ap- ey will not be nEEaeeard indust — An appeal to the oil Prices” to voluntary freeze Use ae Petroleum products th mestically, heaginwenout the daily press, Prova) have given instant ap- iMflatio © these so-called “anti- Port watY” moves. NDP sup- ing th eee forthcoming, echo- ine taken at the recent ling -cCOuver convention fo «eo (Or increased subsidies oN inflation. Ih Teases Ahead Bec What these meas- hea eened to do is to yY further price in- “ in the near tiie. and ‘ h | Eres at their present Our o, -? at least for the next the Way Ne months. After that, “eases” ‘S Pen for further in- In public, the industries con- cerned, especially the bakeries and dairies, seem to be satisfied. The president of Dominion Dai- ries, Frank Warnock, said that the federal subsidies may per- mit his company to absorb cost increases over the next year. However, a cautious note was given by a representative of the bakeries. Speaking last week over CBC news, he warned that not all costs involved in making bread are found in wheat. Other factors also come in. So, for the consumer, the word is “watch out.” Clear Indication Otto Lang, minister respon- sible for the Canadian Wheat Board said baking industry re- presentatives left him “with a clear indication” that the last price increase of six cents a loaf, coupled with the new subsidies, will cover increased wheat and other costs for millers for at least six months. The government measures were announced the day after the price of bread went up by six cents a loaf in most parts of ’ Canada. Regarding oil, the key word in the government’s new “anti- inflation” measures is ‘‘volunt- ary.” And although many as- sumed that gasoline prices were to be frozen until the end of January, gasoline prices were hiked up the day after in many service stations, sometimes by as much as 10 cents a gallon. It is clear that Trudeau’s measures do not apply, as was inferred by his government when the measures were an- nounced in Parliament, to the refined products bought by con- sumers. Nor are there any measures to .control prices or costs of oil used in Eastern Can- ada, mostly imported from Venezuela and the Middle East. Trudeau’s “anti-inflationary” measures, it is estimated, will cost Canadian taxpayers in the neighborhood of $300-million by March 31, 1974. : More Corporate Bonus Much of this will go into the pockets of the bread and dairy giants who control most of the market in both industries. Their inflated profits will be guaran- teed through government “wel- fare,” i.e., subsidies, using tax dollars extracted mainly from the salaries of working people. These same working people, ‘under ,the new government measures, gain nothing, except the promise of paying the pre- sent outrageous prices for bread, milk and petroleum products (gasoline, fuel oil for heating, e nounced on Sept. 5 a series of ed to asures ostensibly design- and © check rising bread, milk Petroleum prices. : etc.) for probably another five months. And after that, higher prices. Looking at these measures in light of the proposals of the Communist Party of Canada to combat the inflationary price spiral, the Trudeau government is only to be condemned. Key to the Communists’ pro- posals are measures to control and curb monopoly power. The government has done just the opposite. Where Communists see cor- porate profiteering as the chief cause of price hikes, the gov- ernment took measures to guarantee corporate profits through the institution of subsi- dies to them. Being Gouged Where Communists demand that corporations pay their fair share of the tax load on the profits they receive, the govern- ment has guaranteed these pro- fits through the use of tax dol- lars extracted mainly from the very people who are being goug~ ed, the workers. Where the Communists see the necessity of rolling back the outrageously high food prices through powers granted to the Prices Review Board, the Libe- ral government has told the Canadian people that they will ans’ allowances, etc., and that these be adjusted every three months in line with price rises. The government has done this, at least on old age pensions, but in typical Liberal fashion. Pen- sioners, we are told, will receive a pitiful increase of about $10 next time around. All in all, the “anti-inflation- ary” measures announced by the Trudeau government last week will do nothing roll back the high prices, or to ease the al- ready heavy load borne by Cana- dian workers. Prices too steep? Tighten your belt The capitalist press in- creasingly calls upon Cana- dians to exercise self-discip- line, as in these words in the Regina Leader-Post: “The So- lution—if we have the cour- age to make it work —is to tighten the belt.” When President Nixon im- posed the freeze on beef prices until September 12, the Leader-Post printed this re- vealing. statement: “Canadian packing houses were also profiteering . . . because they were buying U.S. beef at prices lower than Canadian producers were asking.” PACIFIC TRIBUNE — FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 14, 1973 — PAGE 9