TERRACE _ “An open house and public meeting here next week represents a significant change of direction by the Parks ministry, one of the co-hosts, says its northern i region plann- ing manager. ‘At also represents a significant | change from previous practice, Mike Murtha added, ©While in the past the public had. only been directly involved — "vole in helping focus attention . when it-came to preparation of management ‘‘masterplans”' for | “he suggested. : "Another. area where the parks service -had not done enough : work to date was in highlighting | existing parks, *'This is the first ‘time we've done it. for park establishment,’* he explained, The Terrace meeting is one of.“ 16 being held in the northwest this month. as part of Parks - Pian '90, a ministry review of its présent. mandate, goals’ and planning process which also in- vites ‘suggestions of areas which should. be: considered in future park development plans.. ‘That last point was impor- tant, - Murtha ‘said, because members -of the public could at times provide detailed informa- tion that the parks service might not have on specific areas in . their region. ; As far as the Terrace area was concerned, he said a number of features — Lakelse Lake and its ‘hotsprings, Shames Mountain ski hill, internationally renown- ed. fishing and native heritage sites — made it a. potential” . some sensitive areas, however, _ that: might not be a goad idea and a Wildlife Management would ‘therefore be more appropriate. tourist destination. While much of the work of marketing those attractions fell to the private sector, he said B.C. Parks had’a role to play by “putting some of the green blobs on the map that draw peo- ple.” And although there were already some in. the Terrace area, ‘there could be more,’? he -added. For example, given the reputation and popularity of the Skeena River fishery, he sug- gested his agency did not pro- vide adequate access to the - river,.“‘We are certainly weak in terms of. actively managing a section of the Skeena River for sport fishing.” Esker Bar might be one spot ‘However, although he agreed where the provision of improv- ed access, picnic tables and toilets should be considered, there was also a shortage of boat launch ramps on the river, _ his agency would have to assess ‘its responsibility in - meeting: such needs against that of local . ‘government or: “Private enter-, prise... “Jt may be we have a minor on some’ of those deficiencies,” the native history of the area. However, it had been. working ‘with the Nisga'a on developing. the proposed Lava Beds park "and. had ‘advised the Kitselas it was ready ‘‘at any time’’ to assist the band in establishing a heritage park. The need for wildlife viewing opportunities was also recogniz- ed but, Murtha-said this aspect was: being co-ordinated by the Wildlife branch of tie Environ- ment ministry. The part played by B.C. Parks, he explained, depended on the area under consideration and the objec- tives, _ “4 park would generally im-" ply you do something to enable people to get in there and use the area,” he explained, In area designation “it depends on why the area is important,”" On completion of the public meetings, Murtha. said the results would be presented to~ cabinet including a list of what had emerged as the most impor- tant study areas in the province. B.C. Parks would then seek cabinet’s go-ahead to start the — park establishment process. | Next Wednesday’s open house begins at 2 p.m. in the - Inn of the West which will also be the’ venue for the public meeting scheduled for.7:30 p.m. a eee ee ee a ee BD ‘Smithers 2 benefits, ° benefits. “Facts and figures ‘ The first provincial park — Strathcona — was created in “1911. Early parks covered large tracts of land ‘selected for their: beauty, tourism potential and therefore economic With the increased popularity of camping, picnicing and ‘hiking in the ’50s5 and '60s, there was.a heavy emphasis on scenic and recreational qualities in creating new parks. . Through the '70s.and ’80s, wilderness, marine and special feature parks began to appear as demand for backcountry “ recreation and environmental awareness increased. - Today, there are 390 parks in the province system’ ‘ranging m from small recreational areas to vast wildernesses such as the -. Spatsizi Plateau. They include 11,500 campsites, 5,000 picnic -- sites, 3, 600 kms of trails and 900 kms of road. . Recorded visits to provincial parks have increased by more than 40 per cent over the past 10 years. That period has also - seen the growth in popularity of new outdoor recreational pursuits such as mountain biking and river rafting. A ministry survey conducted in 1989 showed 50 per cent of - BCers had-visited a provincial park in the past year. In that same: year, B.C, Parks. recorded 21 million visits which generated an estimated ‘$400 million in direct economic . Adventure tourism is the fastest growing sector of that in- dustry, expanding at the rate of 20 per cent a year. It currently brings i in $150 million annually while revenues from tourism in. general were expected to hit $4 billion last year. yee ae 4 treseds aimeni TERRACE — While he agrees there is a need for some addi- tions to the parks system in the northwest, past chamber of commerce president Bob Park says upgrading existing parks should be a priority. ; Park. said alot of. tourists came into his sporting goods store during the course of a season and he therefore had an opportunity to. find out what they thought of the northwest. The message, he ‘said, was “They like what we have,” but wanted to see more facilities in the parks suchas hot. water, sewage tanks and greater numbers of picnic tables. With fishing still the major draw for visitors to Terrace, he agreed increased access to. the Skeena was needed. However, there might be little point in B.C. Parks pursuing that unless - other agencies got in step. - As an example, he pointed to the city's decision last year to tiésin’ park: MB cary close Ferry Island beach to vehi- cle access. While that was in- tended to eliminate overnight camiping on the beach, it also prevented any boats being laun- ched from there. . A more serious problem was . the introduction last year by the Environment. ministry of new angling regulations which re- quired tourists. to buy special, additional licences to fish many local rivers, Maintaining those regulations and the extra cost they led to were hurting the tourist angler ‘business; Park said there seem- ed little point in one agency in- creasing access to the river if the policies of another were scaring people away from the Skeena. Apart from ‘fishing, visitors were drawn to the northwest by its wildlife. He therefore sug- gested B.C. Parks also examine the ‘possibility of providing more wildlife viewing oppor- tunities, SCENIC VALUES are not hard to find when crulsing Alastair Lake at status. The Parks ministry is naw asking the pubilc to suggest ways “the head of the Gltnadolx River, The Gitnadolx watershed Is cur. - Rcould improve its system in the northwest. S rently classed as a recreational area, a step on the way to ful I park, ye : : ot hold wt win ls mph rea ¥byale ht] Bob Park However, while such addi- tional features would be welcomed by tourists, he repeated the main objective in- | itially should. be to upgrade the existing parks inventory. = produced a draft . working Yh CASH atid Pilea eyed The _ Parks ministry. “has map cuilining “potential ad- _ ditions to the parks system’? across the entire province. _ Areas in the northwest iden- tified as possible candidates in the northwest are shown at left. The lone (rangle shape -denotes the Kitlope Basin. which is already the subject of a joint study by effected government agencies. _. Box shapes denote propos- _ ed ‘large study areas” where ’ the goals are landscape con- ‘servation and/or backcoun- try recreation. They are the. Bear Glacier and Pass near ‘Stewart (7), the Nass Valley (9), Campania Island (12) '. and Foch and Miskatla Inlets. "on the Sue Channel (13). Diamond shapes denote Proposed ‘‘small study. . “areas? where. recreation and » special feature conservation - are the goals. These refer to Sites on Dundas Island (9), Kitson Island (10), the Lower ' Skeena and its estuary (11), Porcher and Stephens Islands (12), Portland and Observatory Inlets (13), Work Channel (14), Bulkley Junction. (15), Doeglas Channel and Gardner Canal (28), Grenville Channel (29), Pitt amd Anger Islands (31) and Princess Royal Island (32). kekkk In identifying the potential study areas, the Parks service took into account six objec- tives. They were: ¢ Landscape conservation — protection of of ‘viable, representative examples’’. of differing landscapes; feature conser- fon of Key"? natural and menbtarel:" features’’; ¢ Provide recreation op-— portunities on tourism travel routes; e Ensure availability of backcountry recreation; * Provide outdoor recrea- tion, holiday destinations; and * Ensure local residents have adequate outdoor recreation facilities available. In terms of study areas proposed in the northwest, all the above criteria are met by the Nass Valley, with its 250 year-old lava beds and native history. The lower Skeena River and its estuary is earmarked because it meets the travel route, holiday destination, | local recreation and special feature benchmarks. The Bouglas Channel and Gardner Canal area falls under the travel route, back- country, local recreation, landscape and special feature - categories. R.D. splits over — Kitlope camp idea TERRACE — A local resident’s plans to establish hunting- fishing camps in the Kitlope Valley have drawn very mixed reactions from Kitimat-Stikine regional district directors. The debate was sparked by Lakelse Air operator Harry Mc- Cowan’s application to the Lands branch for a licence of occupation. McCowan wants to set up a base camp at Kitlope Lake with satellite camps on the Kitlope River and nearby Ear Lake. Although the planning com- mittee had recommended the district not object to, the pro- posal, Kitimat director Ray Brady took exception to that suggestion. . ' Pointing out many organiza- tions had identified the Kitlope as perhaps the only example of unlogged temperate rainforest left on the B.C.*coast, Brady added even the Forests ministry had asked West Fraser to put its. - harvesting plans for the area on we: - thon “eVetitinally-pass a lf McCowan. wanted to operate a fly-in service for hunters and anglers, he added, there were lots of other places on the Douglas Channel.where . he could do so. Defending the recommenda- tion, planning committee chair- man and New Hazelton director Pete Weeber noted only tent camps were planned, He therefore could not ‘see there would be much impact. Wondering what the . dif- ference was between setting up camps for sportsmen and camps for people carrying out the pro- posed studies of the Kitlope, — Terrace director Bob Cooper . also dismissed claims. of * ‘the valley’ $ uniqueness. ' Recalling he had flown over the area last summer, Cooper said, ‘‘There’s nothing special about it, coastal valley.” .... The proposal'the district not! Object’ to :McCowair’s: ‘applica: ; ee eee ee it’s just. another i