2 : a First photo of cloud seeding This US Signal Corps photo is the first ever taken of the cloud seeding process under natural circumstances, and is actual physical proof that clouds can be crystallized and broken up by a man-made procedure. The channel shown, photograpphed from the cloud seeding: plane, is about 1 and 2/10 miles at its ' widest point. Similar experiment were carried out in a recent hurricane and the process has been used throughout the US in attempts to bring rain. @ SCIENCE FEATURE Vitamin thief By DYSON CARTER T do you think of peo- ple who buy expensive vege- tables, cook them carefully, serve them on the table and then throw them out? : : How do you rate parents who worry about their children’s health, and feed them poison that makes the kids get worse and worse? Let’s cut this riddle short, We are talking about Mineral Oil. Thick colorless, oily stuff sold in drug stores, for relief of constipation. Often mixed with other medicines like agar. Com- monly used in commercial foods. Mineral Oil, regardless of its form, name or price, is a poison. Just before the war,* scientists of the American Medical Asso- ciation (Council on Foods and Nutrition) sent out a warning about mineral oil. Some food companies, they said, were put- ting mineral oil in salad dress- ings. The biochemists told doc- ters to be on the look-out for such products, and to stop their patients from eating them. Why? Because mineral oil takes out of our bodies the two precious vitamins A and D. These vitamins dissolve in oil. Vitamins A and D are extreme- ly important for good health, from the time before we are born until. the day we die. Mil- lions of people get very little of these vitamins. Mineral oil coats the stomach with a greasy film and “washes away” vita- mins A and D. The warning got little pub- licity. Then came the war. All of a sudden, food companies and restaurants by the thousands be- gan using vast quantities of mineral oil. It was a cheap sub- stitute for vegetable oils and Shortenings. Car-loads: of this food poison went into salad dressings, popcorn, doughnuts, potato chips and all sorts of fried foods. Sometimes the la- bels said there was mineral oil FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 1947 _ does in these foods. But that was no protection. The public still not know that science strongly condemns mineral oil. So. the poison is being sold on a mass scale. | . In the last five years, many more scientific reports have come out, branding mineral oil as a very dangerous substance. I have looked over articles from five medical journals, and the evidence is shocking. Here is a brief summary: 1. Mineral oil washes out vita- mins A and D, whether you swallow the oil in “constipation medicines” or in foods. 2. One ounce of the oil can remove all the vitamin A you get in two weeks of eating the - -best vegetables. ‘ 3. A child who gets a small daily dose of mineral oil, will lose all the vitamin A in ten times the amount of spinach he or she could eat in a day! 4. Pregnant women, and men or women on “reducing diets,” are seriously harmed by mineral oil; because they need all the vitamins they can get, and the oil starves them of these pre- cious elements. : 5. Babies and children tend to develop the terrible bone disease called rickets when they are fed mineral oil in any form. 6..A pregnant woman is in danger of serious bleeding. at childbirth if she has taken much mineral oil; the oil inter- feres with vitamin K, necessary for healthy blood-clotting. 7. All people, at any age, are in danger of excessive bleeding (in accidents or operations) if they take mineral oil. x The Medical Association be- came so alarmed over these facts that drastic action was taken in 1942. After that, not a single food product, contain- ing mineral oil, was approved by the association, even if the food could be given only by doctors. Who gets the cream? Editor, Pacific Tribune: ERE are a few facts re- garding the “milk question,” as seen by various parties in- terested. First let us hear the farmers’ complaint. The follow- ing is a report published in the Vancouver Sun on Febru- ary 22: : VICTORIA—Farmers of the Fraser Valley and Vancouver Island are not getting enough for their milk to give them a decent wage. On stormy days in the winter the farmers are dangerously close to not having enough milk to supply the householders with fluid mitk. There are two of the chief facts brought out by Dean F. M. Clement of UBC in his survey of milk production costs. Dean Clement finds that the average cost of producing milk of the farms is 58.79 per pound butterfat. The average selling price is 73.24 cents. : This leaves the farmer 14.45 cents per pound as his margin which represents his wages. To the average producer, says Dean Clement this means $819 .@ year. . Working out adjustments for interests on investment and other factors he comes to the conclusion that the total farm income for the average man is $1406 as a cash return for capital invested and labor. Dean Clement declares that - on the supposition that 85 per- cent of producers must receive their costs of production they should now get 75.18 cents per pound butterfat for their milk exclusive of what they are en- titled in the way of wages for their labor. Adding to this a wage of $100 a month for the farmer, _complaints of he estimates the average selling price should be 94.61 cents, a boost of 21.37 cents or about 30 percent over the present average price. Please notice that these facts were found by the UBC; that the price of “butterfat should be 94.61 a pound; that the re- port ‘was made before subsidies were removed. Now the farm- ers must pay an increase of $8 a ton for wheat, $6 for oats, $11 for barley, $4 for laying mash and $3 for stock mash, The farmer is about where he was during the war years; pro- ducing at a loss, for the 385 cents on 100 lb. now allowed by the provincial milk board is not enough, Well, let the farmers speak for themselves. The following was printed in the Sun on October 22: Action tantamount to a “milk strike” was threatened by farmers Tuesday at the B.C. Milk Board’s hearing on prices in the industry. Milk producers are asking a two-cent per quart increase. ‘If there is no bigger a re- turn on milk, farmers will turn to cash crops,” said Les Gil- mour, speaking for Richmond Milk Producers. Gilmour said they lost thousands of dollars on the dairy industry last year. E. G.>Sherwood, of Lulu Is- land, said he produced 150,000 quarts last year. After paying expenses and not counting any interest on his $75,000 capital outlay, he realized $335 as ‘his salary as manager for a year. This year he anticipates a $2000 loss. Let us turn a deaf ear to the non-producing distributors. There are _ too many of them. If their de- _Sask.— -nesday night that profits of mands were to be satisfied their number would double un- til they ruined farmers and starved workers’ children in the city .-However, they were not forgotten and they will get 5 cents a can more: Indeed, they get the cream. As to the champions of cheap and abundant milk consump- tion, who are really fighting for national health and whose efforts are just and right, their demands have been disregard- ed just like all their com- plaints against the ever-increas- ing cost of living. Price con- trol and subsidies are the only remedy but it appears that to get them we will have to turn the present government out of office. If, in spite of all, you still believe in the superiority of free enterprise, then read this, dated. October 16, and give a lusty cheer: NORTH BATTLEFORD, Agriculture Minister James Gardiner suggested Wed- from 13 to 14 cents more than a “legitimate profit’ were being made on butter sales. Speaking at a Liberal rally here, the federal minister of agriculture said that in some cases butter purchased ° during the spring, when the retail price was 48 cents a pound, now was being retailed at more than 60 cents a pound. ‘TI want to say to those holding butter ... in the light of the prices they paid the farmer in May, June and July, those persons could still pay the farmer 65 cents and sell the butter at 61 cents a pound, he said. F. K. MERGOP. Ladner, B.C. Should You Have Completed and mailed This I F you are entitled to repayment ill napa, toes WD manne Lae tetow) 5 OS aecen one 0k ee Re yom tO towns Ft Ls a ee = os, Portion of your 1942 Income Tax, AND— I F you live at a different address, or have chan ed marriage or other reasons since filing your 1942 eB Siar che YOU SHOULD COMPLETE THIS CARD — of the Refundable Savings Nee a rd? Se A Cenc If you have not yet done so please act now. All cards should be in the Department by Noy. 30th Remember! There are com delivered to each household If you have a change of name or addres It will assist in the proper delivery DEPARTMENT OF NATIONAL Taxation Division Hon. James J. McCann inister of National Revenue 8 to report do it now, of your cheque! ’ REVENUE Ottawa PACIFIC TRIBUNE—PAGE ? ee ee ae oa