46st to provide underground servicing for ail β€˜The developer will be required as normal hook up charges for water, his Hydro, Telephone etc. a8 we.” storm, sanitary. The architectuze of t at in isolation, it should be he proposed development is very attractive and, if looked considered a very desirable development. - However, a number of concerns emerge from this proposal, the most significant being: the relationship of this project with the overall future development of this area, : the impact of this development and future developments in the area's transportation systells 7 . 20s POCA the provision of appropriate services to this and future developments, and oo, as the reduced parking atandard proposed which will add to the parking problema already existing in the area. . 7 It. is net possible to evaluate this project, from a land use amd urban design. β€” point of views without an overall view to the area. The applicant has oe provided a preliminary concept that appears to accommodete their proposal quite well; however, it is not appropriate to make a judgment on the current application until a full-blown Area Control Pian, analyzing all aspects of - land use, traffic, transportation, services, recreation and environmental impacts ie completed. The Planning Department, therefore, recommends that this project not be. approved to proceed to bylaw stage at this time, and that the applicant be advised that Council will not consider this project until the information β€” noted under (1) and (2) in the "Recommendation" section above is available. | Carlos Feli (M.C.1.P- aa Registered Director,of Planning _GF/vh 1D476~6. re Doe en - ft etcee som mntrts : |