June 30th, 1975 That the draft resolution set forth in a memorandum from the City Clerk, June 16th, 1975, calling for the demolition of the premises at 2571 Pitt River Road, not be processed. Carried. Aldermen Laking and Mabbett voted against the resolution. Prior to passage of the foregoing resolution, the following amendment was proposed: Moved by Alderman Laking: Seconded by Alderman Thompson: That the foregoing proposed resolution be amended by adding the following words as the end thereof: "SUBJECT to removal of the building within one year and assurance that it would not be used for human habitation during that time." Defeated. Aldermen Laking and Mabbett voted in favour of the resolution. REPORTS: Land Use Comm. From the Land Use Committee, June 27th, 1975, advising that the re Gen. Liquor Licence-PoCo question of a General Liquor Licence for the PoCo Valley Golf & Country Valley Golf & Country Club Club was referred to the Land Use Committee to be pursued under the Council guidelines for "Public Participation" as Council was of the epinion that granting of such a licence to the Club might permit wide open liquor sales which would not be in the best interests of the area and that the adjacent land owners should be consulted. The Committee, in its report, advised that the question of control was discussed with the City Solicitor whose view was that the present wording of the Zoning By-law is sufficiently explicit to limit the use of the Clubhouse building only strictly to activities customarily associated with a Golf Club use and in spite of the fact that the liquor licence might be of general application and permit broader use, the licence holder would not be permitted to extend the use to say, a beer parlour or neighbourhood pub operation, as he is prevented from so doing by the wording of the By-Law. The City Clerk advised that Mr. R. Gill, Managing Director of the PoCo Valley Golf & Country Club was present this evening in the event members of Council may have any questions to ask of him and Mayor Campbell advised that a delegation of residents from the area concerned were also in attendance. Mr. Don Ray, President of the Association of Concerned Citizens, acted as spokesman for the group and stated he believed the concern of most of the residents was that if a general liquor licence was issued the use could be extended to that of a beer parlour or neighbourhood pub and generate more traffic. Alderman Thompson advised, in answer to a