to. fy to 5 Terraie, which means a delay of at least one hour. Vic- — toria is expected to make a deci- sion on the. Trans-Provincial pro- . posal by the end of this month, The city’has also sent a copy of » their letter of support to the Air-. port Advisory Committee for: fur- . ther consideration. : POACHING CASES CROWD - COURT LIST . | Charges and convictions under the Wildlife Act continue to grow. A ‘decision will be handed down in Terrace Provincial Court _ on May 21 following an incident nearly a year ago in which Ter- race resident James Webb was charged with hunting wildlife with the. aid of a light and with- out reasonable caution for the safety of others. Terrance Drake Jr. and Richard Senft will appear “PHOTOGRAPHY | murray metcalfe Phone today for ‘your | in court June 8 to face similar charges. Earlier this month AB-year-old Thomas Michael Barnes. of - ‘Ter- race was sentenced to 14 days in prison, placed on probation for three months: and had a $250 rifle seized for using. a firearm while under suspension.’ Barnes. also - faces a second five-year ‘suspen- - sion of his hunting and firearm | licence privileges. Barnes's original hunting and firearms suspension was handed down by the deputy director of the Wildlife Branch last. summer _ following a June 3 conviction on a charge of hunting with the aid of an illuminating device. In addi- - tion to the suspension, that con- viction’ cost Barnes $800 and his rifle. ; The deputy director of the Wildlife Branch advised Barnesin © mid-August of the automatic five- year hunting licence suspension and a_ discretionary five-year — firearm licence suspension. According to his lawyer, Doug free consultation Halfyard, Barnes | checked with the local conservation officer and was told he could own a firearm while under . suspension but couldn't fire it or carry it outside. his place of residence. Barnes bought a second: rifle, and on Aug. 17, 1991, werlt.camp-__ ing near the. Lakelse. River with his wife and some .. friends. Barnes’s lawyer told judge. .PR.. Lawrence that Barnes did not ‘intend to go hunting, and from — his own interpretation of the firearms suspension he reasoned — target shooting with a friend would be allowed. His lawyer argued that the five-yéar suspension on the hunt- . ing licence was automatic, but the firearm licence suspension is levied at the discretion of the. deputy director of the Wildlife Branch. From this it could be interpreted that the main thrust of the law was to control hunting, ‘not firearms. And Barnes wasn't hunting. Crown counsel Henry Waldock | — pointed out the seriousness of the offence, and while he admitted penalties for. violations under the - Wildlife Act are harsh, he said they are not unnecessarily harsh "because enforcement is very. difficult”. - "It’s something that’s done away from people and it’s really a matter of good faith,” Waldock — said of the hunting regulatiGns. . "The sentence is to ensure the protection of wildlife is achieved. . Therefore, the minimum penalties‘ are not excessively harsh.” _ . _ Under the Wildlife Act, hunt- : ing with the aid of an illuminat- 2 ing device, or pitlamping, carries ‘a minimum penalty of 14 days‘in prison and/or a $1,000 fine, and a maximum penalty of six months | in prison and/or a $60,000 fine. Do you want to support your com- munity? Here's your chance! Big Broth- ers and Big Sisters Affiliated is recruit- ing new members. Regular meetings are the third Monday of every month at 7:30 P.M. at 4660C Lakelse Avenue. For 635-9585 | Terrace «Review - Aprit 24, 1992 more information, phone 636-4232,