LABOR BCGEU blasts gov't handouts - The B.C. Government Employees Union has filed a formal complaint with the Labor Relations Board, the first-action in the union’s campaign against Socred plans to privatize government services and “downsize” the public service. The application to the LRB charged the Ministry of Lands, Parks and Housing with irregular staffing procedures, point- ing out that private consultants were being hired to replace laid off or fired govern- ment workers. : MTOC seeks showdown, The Metro Transit Operating Com | pany is “trying to provoke an all-out confrontation” with its employees, tie Office and Technical Employees Union Local 378, has charged. _ Anne Harvey, who chairs the unions | The bulletin noted that some depart- ments were making “frantic efforts” to meet the staff reduction targets set by the government. The object, it said, “is to make it appear to the general (and voting) public that government ‘downsizing’ is a success and, at the same time, to provide inspiration to the private sector.” __ However, it emphasized: “Preliminary investigations by the union have indicated barrel politics. workers,” he charged. average and for a lot less money,” he said. According to the union, it is just one example of “what is taking place behind the closed doors of some ministries”. And Cliff Andstein, director of collective bargaining for the BCGEU called the min- istry’s action ‘“‘a blatant return to pork “The ministry, in this case has hired three consultants, one of whom is a former gold commissioner for B.C., to do clerical work normally performed by government Andstein said that a consultant was being paid $290 per day to go over two to four complex files or six to eight simple files per day. “This is work normally per- formed by a Clerk 5 whose production standard is at least 15 files per day on the CLIFF ANDSTEIN. ..Socreds hiring private consultants at exorbitant rates to do government employees work. it will be conducting further investigations and then releasing the information to the public. Last week, the BCGEU sent bulletins out to its various components asking union members to report details of government reorganization moves in their departments. that in the area of contracting out of work to the private sector it may cost the tax- payer more, not less, for the same services.” BCGEU president Norman Richards _charged that the government was using its privatization program “to reward its polit- ical supporters.” Earlier this month, the BCGEU blasted the government for its plans to close the Coquitlam regional laundry in April and contract out hospital laundry services as well as its plans to turn prison food servi- ces over to private caterers. The corrections component of the BCGEU voted Feb. 12 to “refuse to work Participate, co-operate or interface with the untrained staff of private contractors providing food services to corrections centres.” VGH accused of anti- Building Trades workers demonstrated outside Vancouver General Hospital Feb. 16 to protest what the Building Trades Council termed union-busting tactics of the VGH board of trustees. The noon-hour rally was addressed by Building Trades Council president Roy Gautier and“B.C. Federation of Labor secretary Mike Kramer who pledged the full support of the federation. “Your fight is our fight,” he declared. The Trades released an information bul- letin showing that the VGH board, while it had insisted it was unable to pay wage increases to hospital workers, had hidden $7.79 million in wages that had been bud- geted but never spent. “This is just one further illustration of the active support the trustees are giving to the Socred govern- ment’s attack on unionized workers,” the bulletin charged, adding that construction workers were also victims of that policy. Last year, the VGH board, at the urging of the provincial government, broke with past practice and awarded a $4.5 million building contract to a non-union company, Kirkwall Construction, The firm has been the target of Building Trades protests ever since. But it was a comment by George Plant, a Socred-appointed trustee and the member of the VGH building committee, which most dramatically underscored the attitude of the VGH board and drew the ire of unionists. “Tf they’re hungry enough,” he said Nov. union stance 9, referring to unemployed construction workers, “they'll work for $6.50 an hour.” The Building Trades charged that the provincial government is not enforcing its own fair wage legislation “and is deter- mined to turn public construction over to non-union contractors.” In a related development, anti-union contractor J.C. Kerkhoff and Sons launched a libel suit last week against the Provincial Council of Carpenters, the union’s local 452 and the president of a housing co-op which had been built by Kerkhoff. The Carpenters have been waging a campaign to stop Penny- farthing Development and the B.C. Central Credit Union from turning a condominium project contract over to Kerkhoff. ‘Solidarity response should echo ’83’ CONTINUED from-page 1 That will more than pay for the loss of user fee revenue as well as the increase in the ’ Health Ministry budget. The budget estimates also revealed that the deficit from last year’s budget was $300 million less than had been projected, giving credence to charges that the government had deliberately “cooked” its books in order to carry out its cutback program. The government will also increase its revenues in this budget from new measures which amount to direct taxes on senior citi- zens and those who require prescription drugs. The minimum property taxes paya- ble rise from $150 to $175 and the deducti- ble for Pharmacare rises from the present $125 to $175. As ominous as the government’s planned cutbacks are its plans for resource revenue. Tabled with the budget were several financial bills including the Resource Stabil- ization Fund Act. Under its provisions, the revenue from resources — royalties, stum- page fees and so on — will be set aside ina fund. In the first year, 70 per cent of that amount will go for debt retirement but in all future years, the entire amount will go for that purpose. Thus money from resource revenues will. not be available to provide government services. Wilson warned that the legislation “will 12 e PACIFIC TRIBUNE, FEBRUARY 22, 1984 mean the complete alienation of resources from the people. “No matter how rich we are in resources or how successful we are in selling them,” he emphasized, “the revenue from them will never be available for health, education or other services.” That process is already underway, he added, noting that resource revenues are expected to rise from $637 million in 1983- 84 to $679 in the new budget “‘yet there will be massive cutbacks in nearly every ministry.” In addition, the government has taken $470 million from general revenue and used it to make a major reduction in the B.C. Rail debt — a move which can only be linked to the Northeast coal deal since BCR is expected to sustain further losses as a result of the coal sellout. _Monday’s budget was universally con- demned throughout the labor movement. B.C. Teachers’ Federation president Larry Kuehn warned that the cuts in the Ministry of Education would translate into the layoff of some 2,000 teachers. B.C. Government Employees Union president Norman Richards said that it would create “fear and apprehension” throughout the government service which faces the loss of more than 4,000 positions. B.C. Fed president Art Kube blasted the government for its “completely cynical” claims of economic recovery. “The cuts in expenditures in every ministry, and the increased revenues from taxes cannot trans- late into anything else but diminished eco- nomic activity in this province,” he said. “How does that increase jobs?” . Kube said that Operation Solidarity and the Solidarity Coalition would be examin- ing the budget in detail in meetings next week before mapping out any action to oppose it. But Wilson emphasized that Solidarity “has as much or more to fight in this budget as the last one. “This budget sets out to accomplish in life what the government was unable to achieve in its last budget and legislation. “It deserves the same response it got last July 7,” he said. negotiating committee, Monday hit © | company for a series of radio and news" : paper ads which “implied that we didnt want to bargain — so we’ve decided t0 call their bluff.” a Harvey told the Tribune the umlom decided to call a new negotiating sessio® for 9 a.m. Tuesday at the Airport Inn a Richmond. At press time the company had yet to respond to the invitation resume talks, broken off last month. —— The OTEU also decided Monday !0 lift its series of flying pickets, which ha@ been stopping buses from entering yat@ around the Lower Mainland during the past two weeks, and instead set informa | tion pickets at major bridges throughoul | the area. e | Bus drivers, members of the Inde pendent Canadian Transit Union, Locé® 2, had respected the pickets, leaving the task of driving retiring rush hour bus into terminals to supervisory staff. | “Our tactics were meant to put pres sure on them (Metro Transit), not cause inconvenience to the public,” Hat vey explained. : To avoid disrupting buses in servie the company could have ordered ! supervisors to reroute buses, “but th told them not to, and then they locke®) out our people in the bus informatio?) service,” said Harvey. MTOC has locked out 95 OTEU} members who answer calls from 'the pu lic seeking route information as well a5 employees in the traffic checking, sch duling. and parts and maintenance) departments. The union has withdraw? the service of six employees. The union, which is in a legal strik "4 position following a 94 per cent vote last} October, has the support of the B.C: Federation of Labor in eforts to achieve an exemption from Bill 3, the Public Sec tor Restraint Act. a Metro Transit has refused to allow the} exemption unless the unions — both the} OTEU and ICTU — allow major take- aways in seniority, jobs transfers an@ other areas. Both unions have beet without a contract since last March, and ICTU members are currently taking 4 strike vote. 4 The company, which operates buses if} Greater Vancouver and Victoria for B.C: | Transit, also wants the unions to accept 4 two-year agreement with no wage} increase in the first year, and 1.5 per cent in the second, “and they’re threatening to withdraw even that offer,” said} Harvey. 4 Meanwhile, B.C. Transit, which has 4 | surplus of $ 4 million for the 1983-84] _ operating year, plans April fare hikes | ranging from 12 to 66 per cent, the} OTEU noted. PACIFIC RIBUNE io ote 8 SbF 0 eek Cp iets oe 6 ece%s Bee ee, Ee, SS es Postal: Cod6"*..;.. ee lamenclosing 1 yr.$140) 2yrs. $250) 6mo.$80) Foreign 1 yr. $200 Bill me later 0 ~Donation$........ READ THE PAPER THAT FIGHTS FOR LABOR Published weekly at 2681 East Hastings Street Vancouver, B.C. V5K 1Z5. Phone 251-1186 je 2 0c8- 6.0 0000 0 On0 06 0 0 e 6 6g ee 0-0 60S Se he yee Yee es ae hoo te ot ek Ek Oe ee Me ke ee