By WILLIAM KASHTAN William Mahoney, Canadian director of the UnitedSteel Workers who won the acclaim of monoply interests last year by his statement that ‘strikes were obsolete’’, seems now to have shifted his position some what. Addres- sing a community forum debate in Kitchener recently he was reported as saying that strikes will become more frequent and more disrup- tive unless radically new techniques are de- veloped and accepted for solving labor-manage- ment problems in Canada. It took a few years for Mr. Mahoney to face up to the facts of life. During the period in which he declared ‘‘strikes were obsolete’’ the strike movement gathered strength, grew in scope and intensity and increasingly took on more and more of a policical character. Not only that. It is interesting to note that sections of working people who were considered conservative in their approach and out- look have likewise been compelled to take up the strike weapon as a means of redressing the situation. The strike of teachers outside of Edmonton, the strike of nurses in one of the children’s hospitals in Montreal, the present strike of hospital employees in Trenton, all morror the fact that not only production workers but the ‘‘white collar’’ workers, pressed by somewhat the same conditions as blue collar workers, are compelled to react in the same way. * * * Thus, notwithstanding Mr, Mahoney’s fondest hopes, the class struggle continues and extends in scope reaching out to ever new - sections of the working people. This is also made evident in the growth of ‘‘wild-cat’’ strikes which this column drew attention to before and which is now spread- ing in the automotive industry. Plagued by increased work loads and speed-up and an accumulation of grievances which the auto companies have completely ignored, the workers have been compel- led to take matters into their hands, These ‘‘wild-cat’’ strikes have not only brought to public at- tention the extent of increased exploitation of the working class; they have also brought to the forefront the unsatisfactory nature of labor acts which give the: monopoly interests full leeway to speed up the workers and undertake other actions against them without the unions being in a position to legally strike during the period of the contract. : x = It is time this situation was corrected. Not only is there need for unions to seek out ways and means of improving contracts to protect the workers against such onerous conditions; what is equally necessary is that the labor acts be amended so that either workers have the right to strike during the period of the contract or they have the right to strike on all questions not covered by the contract. The entire trade union movement needs to give increasing at- tention to this, equally as it needs to give attention to the growing pressures beiae developed by monope?y interests to curb labor’s right to strike, It is not accidental that the capitalist press has recently given considerable publicity to proposals for compulsory arbitration. Nor is it accidental, as was the case during the Longshoremen’s strike in Montreal and other Quebec cities, that voices were raised de- manding government intervention to end the strike. manding government intervention to end the strike. Government intervention and regulation of the trade union movement (of which compulsory arbitration is a part) are dangerous phenomena which the workers need to resist in the strongest possible fashion. * * * This demand for government intervention and for compulsory arbritation does not only come from anti-labor elements; it comes from voices within the trade union movement itself. A case in point is the statement made by A. G. Hearn, Canadian vice-president of the Building Service Employees union which is presently conducting a strike of hospital employees in Trenton, who, if the press reports him correctly, said that ‘‘union members regarded the government’s action in failing to introduce compulsory arbitration as a breach of faith,”’ The same press story points out that a three-man committee was established by the labor minister to study the question of apply- ing compulsory arbitration in labor-management disputes affecting public hospitals, one of the members being the Ontario regional director of organization for the Canadian Labor Congress. * * * What we have here is a fresh upsurge of class collaborationist tendencies on the part of the right wing which may wwll fall in line tendencies on the part of the right wing which may well fall in line with Mr. Mahoney’s views that ‘‘new techniques’’ are needed for solving labor-management problems in Canada. : Whatever these new techniques may be, workers should be on the alert and firmly resist any ‘‘new techniques’’ which infringe on their right to strike and the use of the strike weapon when neces- AUUC & WBA FALL BAZAAR At 805 East Pender St. Thurs., Fri. & Sat., Nov. 14, 15, 16 From 7:30 p.m. Each Evening @ Display of International Folk Handicrafts e@ Sale of Home-Baking, Ukrainian Embroidery, Xmas Gifts @ Games — White Elephant Stall — Ukrainian Meal served from 5:30 p.m.—Tea Room Sat. Night Dance at 9 p.m. — All Welcome -miles MECHANIZATION HELPS WORKERS Automation has no terror for Russian dock workers By ESTHER SHIELDS ILICHEVSK ~— Yuri Stankov showed us how youth and auto- mation go together happily in the Soviet Union’s newest Black Sea port, [ichevsk., The new harbor has 4,000dock workers, They handle the over- flow shipping from Odessa, 15 away. They are young fellows of 18 to 26. Their chief engineer - Yuri - is only 27. And his youthful enthusiasm came out as he guided us around his highly mechanized port. We craned our necks upward to see the long line of huge, _ four-legged dock-side cranes. **Only five years ago this was just a dry salt lake blocked off from the Black Sea,’’ Stankov explained. ‘‘We opened a gate to the sea, dredged deeper chan- nels, constructed ship berths and a dock-side railway, and installed the cranes. In August, 1958, our first ship arrived. Now we have seven berths for freighters coming from many countries.’’ Stankov looked across the bay with his penetrating grey eyes. ‘*¢We can build 30 berths on this side and another 30onthat side,’’ the enthusiastic young engineer explained. ‘‘Our trade is expand- ing. We have a big future. * * * **How do you schedule the dock work?’’ we asked, wondering if Ilichevsk dock workers have to alternate between rush periods and no work, likemany American longshoremen. **Usually we have all the ships we can handle,”’ Stankov replied. **But when there is no work on the docks, the workers get their standby guarantee of three rubles a day. That’s about a third of their regular daily wage rate. Butthey are assigned to other work at whatever wage is paid there, in addition to the three rubles. **Our workers can always help out in construction,’’ Stankov added. ‘*We have so much to build, especially new apart- ments.”’ Union jurisdiction problems do not hold up these Soviet dockers. Their own trade union unites all the workers of ships and docks, seamen as well as longshoremen. The union en- courages time to learn several skills. Almost half of the Black Sea dock workers already are trained to operate fork-lift and other trucks, short cranes on truck bodies, or other mechanical equipment, * * * ‘*What about overtime work, when ships come in too fast?’’ *“‘Sometimes it is necessary to work more than theregular seven hour shift,’’ Stankov agreed. ‘‘ But like human beings!” “You must realize, Mr. Gummidge, you can’t work them Unions in USSR win short week, more pay MOSCOW -—Important gains by the Soviet Union’s 68 million trade unionists were listed by Secretary Leonid Solovyev of the All-Union Trade Council re- cently. The standard work week has already dropped to 39 hours and 24 minutes, he told press cor- respondents, The work week will be cut again in the coming year. And the unions expect to win a six-hour day by the end of the country’s seven-year plan in 1965. Miners and some other heavy industry workers already enjoy the 36-hour week and expect further reductions. With the shorter work week, wages have been inscreased 26% for the miners, 14% for steel and other metal workers, 12% for chemical workers, for example, The Soviet leader dealt with other material gains, as he an- nounced the Thirteenth Congress of the Soviet trade unions will begin Oct. 24, But he gave major attention to the increasing role of the organized workers in man- aging industry. ‘*Trade union production con- ferences especially give the wor- kers an opportunity to direct and govern all the activities of their plants,’’ Solovyev explained to us. ‘‘These conferences con- sider what new machinery, new techniques and processes should be introduced. The trade union- ists can criticize management and they elect permanent execu- tive committees to follow through on recommendations,”’ ‘Profits are examined, too,”’ the trade union secretary con- tinued. The trade unionists have their say on distribution of profits for wage increases or reduction of prices. Or they may propose increasing welfare funds for workers’ education, vacations, pensions and other substantial ‘*fringe’’ benefits, “Soviet workers are very much interested in boosting production of their own plants andthe country = a whole,’’ Solovyev stated, They know from their own ex- perience that greater labor pro- ductivity brings them a higher standard -of living,’ he said, a __ November 15, 1963~—PACIFIC TRIBUNE—P® the trade union must give its consent in every case for such overtime work: An individual worker may not work overtime more than two seven-hour shifts in one month. And overtime work must be paid double the regular. wage.” Another young man, chairman A.F. Lugovtsov of the Maritime Trade Union Committee of the whole Black Sea area, supple- mented Stankov’s remarks, ‘*Arrivals and departures of Soviet ships are carefully timed,’? Lugovtsov explained, Thus the docks work with little interruption. ‘‘But foreign ships don’t follow our schedule, so sometimes we have rush days with overtime.”’ **Under our planned economy, we want the highest mechaniz- ation of work,’’ the trade union chairman continued. ‘‘Our aimis to take the heavy work off the workers’ backs,”’ A seaman with us joked about the dock workers: ‘‘Those sun- tanned Apollos like to show off to the girls. But nowthey develop their muscles in sports, not on the job.’’ The trade union encourages workers to develop new methods of lightening the work, Lugovtsov went on. Black Sea dock and maritime workers have proposed 23,000 new devices and improve- ments in the last six months, They receive bonuses out of the money saved.”’ Moe * * **Of course, mechanization re- duces the number of workers needed for a particular job,’’ the trade union chairman admitted. **But Soviet shipping is growing fast. We always need nore wor- kers on ships and docks,”’ Then engineer Stankov took us to see a brigade of dock workers unloading the new So- viet ship ‘*Frederick Joliot-Cu- rie.’’ We watched a giant crane lift a load of raw rubber from Malaya from the hold. The crane operator swung the load out and dropped it gently in front-of us— 15 bales of 250 pounds each. Four dock workers quickly unfastened the double clamps on each bale and the crane swung back toward the ship, Stankov told us that four other workers ‘in the hold put the clamps on the bales. A woman-checker— not part of the brigade—stood in the bow keeping score onthe work. On the dock a powerful lift- truck, with a huge scoop easily caught up the rubber bales and hurried off to the warehouse. There we found three more men of the brigade helping stack bales. “Who controls the sling- loads?’’ we asked Stankov. “The trade union committee decides on the basis of safety,’ the engineer replied, ‘‘Every dock worker gets at least tw weeks’ training, mostly on saf- ety. Everyone must pass an eX" amination on safety rules. The trade union is very insistent abou this and other safety measures generally, If the union committee finds someone in m amagement negligent or violating safety, he can be sent to prison.”’ Ilichevsk has entertained loné- shoremen’s union representa tives and port officials from $4 Francisco and elsewhere. ae lichevsk’s Port Authority ch Khantadze commented that president of the U.S. Foreiél Trade Council visited the re port this year, Khantadze and his” young engineer Stankov tol they hope to see American SH* soon in their proud young P©