ago the society took over the collection of deposit bev- erage bottles and cans from the area’s wholesale beer and , alcoholic . beverage distributor, Big River. It seemed like a promising idea at the time in terms of bringing money into the society, but that promise hasn’t been realized; The society pays the public $1.00 a dozen for beer cans and bottles instead of the $1.20 Big River used to pay. The cans and bottles are then sold to Big River for.$1.20, with the $,20 going to support the society’s activities. But the public feels like it’s. being stung for the $.20..Big River was required by law to take the returned containers and pay back the full deposit, so the bottle and can return trade was never a money-making proposition, just a cost of doing business for the distributor. The soft drink can and bottle business is worse. The society has to make a separate arrangement with each distributor; Pepsi went along with the ar- rangement, Coke did not. Western Family beverage cans have to be taken back to Overwaitea, the retailer, for the society to claim the deposits; Crag-. mont cans and bottles go to Safeway. Donahue stops short of saying it’s a nightmare, but the inconsist- encies and complications of working the beverage . container deposit system appear to be overwhelming. Finlay’s offer to buy newsprint looks promising. An effective collection system could probably net 15-20 tons a month in the region, with Finlay or its agent taking care of the transportation. Selling paper to NewsTech requires sorting into several grades, baling and-then a shipping arrangement, currently through Rivtow, who have agreed to barge material _ to Vancouver from Kitimat. At the receiving end, the price is not assured until NewsTech has inspected the product. : 7 , The society’s mandate involves a net cost, break even proposition: it shouldn’t cost more to recycle that it does to landfill. The government takes a narrow view of the cost, not considering the long- term environmental impact of landfilling and other esoteric factors, but at $300 a ton running a blue box program is probably permanently beyond reach, Donahue says there is confusion about who is responsible for the generation of waste material. A policy vacuum exists that in effect makes no one res- ponsible, neither the consumer nor the manufacturer, although Donahue said he has noticed a significant trend among retailers to take more responsibility for the waste material they generate in the market. But as it stands now, it’s everyone for himself, with the recycling society attempting to function in whatever capacity each differing expectation places on it. In his trials and investigations as a member of the society’s board, Donahue has come to at least one unshakeable conclusion. "No blue. boxes here," he» says. "No way" 0 — Michael Kelly we . wee py | ees y ee gee Me . 4 . * ’ ‘Nove how everybody's building . remakes of the classics? “Yawn. ~ Yamaha ‘went another ; . ‘route. They. . ~builtaclassic , re from scratch... 4m Theallnew @ _ 600ccSecall - has a radical, : ‘Genesis-inpired % engine layout Monocross rear suspension, front and &. rear disc brakes. . And handling that’ S lighter than a history KEN GIBSON : "KEN'S MARINE Terrace Review — March 27, 1992 —