Plan. &Zon.Comn.
re RM-1 & RM-~-2:

reg.changes

sPlan.& Zon.Comn.

ire proposed BC
Tel. addition-
Leigh Square

and | that the Committees

Moved by Aldex man Ranger: . -

tones.

Marcin 2th, 1973,

of F Council may “submit requests as ‘part of their budget |

for financial assistance’ zo ) organizations that are = performing a | funetion that

conplenents the work of shat Committee (for example, the R.C. M. Pp. Au extliary,

Volunteer Firemen, Coquitlan Fine Arts Councii, etc. )

Moved by Alderman Ranger:
Seconded by Alderman Lalcing:
That the. recommendation with “espect to the policy for ‘payment of grants
to organizations in 1973 ¢ as set forth in a report from the. ‘Finance Comittee,
March Ist, 1973, be adopted. | Carried.
Prios. co passage of the foregoing re solution, a brief discussion ensued

and | Alderman Nabbett, in ‘referring to the: last Line of the Feconnendation,

| inquired: how the Coquit lan Fine Arts Council’ fits into the same category as

the R.C.M.P. Auxiliary, The city Ainise rator - advised that the- Government

subsidizes a portion of ‘the. Fine Arts! operating costs, and that that grant

can only be obtained if the organization receives untedpal support. Alder-

man Meyer inquired whether or: not: ‘the recommendation eudorses only those

listed, and the. City ‘Administrator advised to the ‘contrary, ‘stating ‘that |

they were “used as examples only and were not necessarily those that the:

Connittee would have chosen.

From, the ‘Planning & Joning Comittee, submitta ting a further report to.

‘that submitted on February Lath, 1973 when the motion to approve the follow

ing recommendation contained in the latter was “‘tabied until receipt of a.
more Lo-depth report:
“That the proposed Yoning Bylaw regulation changes as outlined in

tem 1(b) of the ‘Planning & Zoning ¢ Committee report, February | Lath, 1973,

be approved in principle,”

The Planning Officer, Mr. KJ. ‘Stinson, by reference to “the city’

Phasing Policy Naps, explained the incent of the Committee! Ss recommendation.

i

Seconded by Alderman Laking:

‘That as recommended dn a ‘Teport from the Planning & Zoning Committee,
the provisions perm being new single family dwelling in the RMA. (ow-Den-
sity Apartment Residential) and RM-2 (iediun-Density Apartment Residential)
zones be. revised to- prohibit | new RSL (One-Fandly Residential) uses ‘in these
, SO | - | Carried.

From the Fanning & Zoning Committee, advising that architect s “Geting

on ‘bohabe of the B. C. Telephone Company presented sa eral schematic drawings

which represent their: long-range proposals ¢ to construct a. three-storey