EDITORIAL Whose Constitution? Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms must be for someone out there. The question is: for whom? As case after case comes before the Supreme Court for interpretation, more and more segments of the Canadian public find themselves not included under its provisions. Quebec, seeing the rights of the French Canadian nation ignored, has refused to sign the Charter. Canada’s Aboriginal people last month found themselves effectively ignored by the Charter provisions, except as interpreted by federal and provincial governments whose hostility to Native self-government and land claims is legendary. _ According to the Supreme Court, a women’s right to equal access to medical care, including abortion, is not considered valid under the Charter. And last week, the class nature and fundamenally anti-democratic thrust of the Charter (and the system of justice that interprets it) was again exposed when the Supreme Court ruled the Charter’s guarantee of freedom of association does not protect a worker's right to bargain collectively or right to strike. So, in five short years, we find that for workers, for women, for French Canada and for Native peoples, the highly-trumpeted Charter of Rights and Freedoms does not apply. Simple mathematics tells us Canada’s constitution excludes a substantial majority of Canadians. It does, say the courts, make union-busting legal. It does, they rule, make it “constitutional” for the U.S. to test cruise missiles over Canada. Simple logic tells